IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eurjdp/v5y2017i1d10.1007_s40070-017-0065-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning and conducting crisis management exercises for decision-making: the do’s and don’ts

Author

Listed:
  • Tonje Grunnan

    (Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI))

  • Håvard Fridheim

    (Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI))

Abstract

Organizations exercise to strengthen their crisis management capability, to identify possible improvements to plans, and to develop necessary skills. Taking part in exercises is one way leaders can test their decision-making abilities under emergencies and crises. Crisis management exercises provide arenas for learning and knowledge sharing. This paper discusses how exercises can be performed better and more efficiently. We draw upon practical experiences from 12 table top and functional exercises, involving a variety of military and civilian actors, and we argue that it is possible to improve the planning and conduct of many exercises, leading to more relevant results and greater benefits for the participants. We want to demonstrate that exercises are important tools for decision-making and strategic planning processes within units or organizations. The target audience for the paper is anyone involved in crisis management exercises, from strategic planners and decision-makers to practitioners. The paper identifies practical recommendations for successful crisis management exercises, both discussion-based and operations-based. Learning points are extracted and analyzed with the use of problem structuring methods, resulting in a list of success criteria for crisis management exercises with examples of what works well and what does not.

Suggested Citation

  • Tonje Grunnan & Håvard Fridheim, 2017. "Planning and conducting crisis management exercises for decision-making: the do’s and don’ts," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 79-95, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eurjdp:v:5:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s40070-017-0065-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40070-017-0065-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40070-017-0065-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40070-017-0065-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ari Ginsberg, 1988. "Measuring and modelling changes in strategy: Theoretical foundations and empirical directions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(6), pages 559-575, November.
    2. Charles Baubion, 2013. "OECD Risk Management: Strategic Crisis Management," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 23, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm, 2022. "Problem Structuring Methods: A Review of Advances Over the Last Decade," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 55-88, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    2. Pettus, Michael L. & Kor, Yasemin Y. & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2007. "A Theory of Change in Turbulent Environments: The Sequencing of Dynamic Capabilities Following Industry Deregulation," Working Papers 07-0100, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    3. Pnina Soffer & Nesi Outmazgin & Irit Hadar & Shay Tzafrir, 2023. "Why Work Around the Process? Analyzing Workarounds Through the Lens of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(4), pages 369-389, August.
    4. Bövers, Jana & Hoon, Christina, 2021. "Surviving disruptive change: The role of history in aligning strategy and identity in family businesses," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(4).
    5. repec:thr:techub:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:39-64 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i::p:18-26 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Jose G. Vargas-Hernandez, M.B.A., 2014. "Research Methodology Strategies In Strategic Management," Interdisciplinary Management Research, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 10, pages 106-147.
    8. Musa, Muhafiza & Isha, Ahmad Shahrul Nizam, 2020. "Substantial effect of voluntary policy interventions on aircraft ground handling safety," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Dennis P. Slevin & Jeffrey G. Covin, 1998. "Time, Growth, Complexity, and Transitions: Entrepreneurial Challenges for the Future," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 22(2), pages 53-68, January.
    10. Jose C. Alves & Tan Cheng Lok & Yubo Luo & Wei Hao, 2020. "Crisis challenges of small firms in Macao during the COVID-19 pandemic," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Edoardo Mollona, 2017. "How visible is the visible hand of top management in strategic renewals? guided evolution and the intraorganizational ecology model of adaptation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 26(4), pages 689-708.
    12. Tomoaki Sakano & Arie Y. Lewin, 1999. "Impact of CEO Succession in Japanese Companies: A Coevolutionary Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(5), pages 654-671, October.
    13. Markus Hang & Jerome Geyer‐Klingeberg & Andreas Rathgeber & Stefan Stöckl, 2018. "Economic Development Matters: A Meta‐Regression Analysis on the Relation between Environmental Management and Financial Performance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(4), pages 720-744, August.
    14. Jianwen Liao & Harold Welsch & Michael Stoica, 2003. "Organizational Absorptive Capacity and Responsiveness: An Empirical Investigation of Growth–Oriented SMEs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 28(1), pages 63-86, January.
    15. Catherine McTeigue & Claudia Sanchez & Edson Santos & Cicero Eduardo Walter & Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira, 2021. "A Strategy for Tourism Growth, Rebound, and Revival: Promoting Portugal as a Destination Post-COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Stoelwinder, Johannes U., 1995. "The role of professional control in the management of complex organizations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Miles M Yang & Feifei Yang & Tingru Cui & Ying-Chu Cheng, 2019. "Analysing the dynamics of mental models using causal loop diagrams," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(3), pages 495-512, August.
    18. Judge, William Q. & Stahl, Michael J., 1995. "Middle-manager effort in strategy implementation: A multinational perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 91-111, March.
    19. Yunshi Liu & Linda Wang & Li Zhao & David Ahlstrom, 2013. "Board turnover in Taiwan’s public firms: An empirical study," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1059-1086, December.
    20. Matthew S. Kraatz & Edward J. Zajac, 2001. "How Organizational Resources Affect Strategic Change and Performance in Turbulent Environments: Theory and Evidence," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(5), pages 632-657, October.
    21. Song Lin & Yasuhiro Yamakawa & Jing Li, 2019. "Emergent learning and change in strategy: empirical study of Chinese serial entrepreneurs with failure experience," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 773-792, September.
    22. Gürdal Ertek & Gül Tokdemir & Mete Sevinç & Murat Mustafa Tunç, 2017. "New knowledge in strategic management through visually mining semantic networks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 165-185, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eurjdp:v:5:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s40070-017-0065-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.