IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v41y2021i3d10.1007_s10669-021-09819-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating risk for top-line growth and bottom-line protection: enterprise risk management optimization (ERMO)

Author

Listed:
  • Howard Miller

    (LBW Insurances and Financial Services, Inc.)

  • Charla Griffy-Brown

    (Pepperdine University)

Abstract

As a component of enterprise risk, risk management, in the past has primarily dealt with down-side risk or protecting the bottom-line. However, in the newly transformed, distributed digital workforce, business success requires a measured appetite for risk in order to achieve top-line growth. In other words, the real gap is the tools needed to evaluate both upside and downside risk when it comes to emerging technologies because the digital world in which all businesses must now operate for growth engenders inherent risk. This means that taking on risk is important for top-line growth as well as minimizing risk for protecting the bottom-line. Therefore, the real challenge is not in minimizing but optimizing risk and reward. In order to answer the question of how we can enhance topline growth and provide bottom line protection through optimizing risk a complementary risk/reward evaluation structure was created. The core components, key definitions and the connection with the previous foundation material will be explained. The risk optimization system was evaluated by business leaders that tested the framework by focusing on corporations across different industry verticals that utilized emerging technology impacted by both risk and reward.

Suggested Citation

  • Howard Miller & Charla Griffy-Brown, 2021. "Evaluating risk for top-line growth and bottom-line protection: enterprise risk management optimization (ERMO)," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 468-484, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:41:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-021-09819-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-021-09819-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-021-09819-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-021-09819-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel DiMase & Zachary A. Collier & Kenneth Heffner & Igor Linkov, 2015. "Systems engineering framework for cyber physical security and resilience," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 291-300, June.
    2. Alexander A. Ganin & Phuoc Quach & Mahesh Panwar & Zachary A. Collier & Jeffrey M. Keisler & Dayton Marchese & Igor Linkov, 2020. "Multicriteria Decision Framework for Cybersecurity Risk Assessment and Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 183-199, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zachary A. Collier & James H. Lambert & Igor Linkov, 2021. "Integrating data from physical and social science to address emerging societal challenges," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 331-333, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Annarelli & Giulia Palombi, 2021. "Digitalization Capabilities for Sustainable Cyber Resilience: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-9, November.
    2. Schmidt, Adam & Albert, Laura A. & Zheng, Kaiyue, 2021. "Risk management for cyber-infrastructure protection: A bi-objective integer programming approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. Alexander A. Ganin & Phuoc Quach & Mahesh Panwar & Zachary A. Collier & Jeffrey M. Keisler & Dayton Marchese & Igor Linkov, 2020. "Multicriteria Decision Framework for Cybersecurity Risk Assessment and Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 183-199, January.
    4. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2023. "A compensatory value function for modeling risk tolerance and criteria interactions in preference disaggregation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Martin Eling & Michael McShane & Trung Nguyen, 2021. "Cyber risk management: History and future research directions," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 24(1), pages 93-125, March.
    6. Vicki Bier, 2020. "The Role of Decision Analysis in Risk Analysis: A Retrospective," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2207-2217, November.
    7. Radanliev, Petar & De Roure, Dave & Cannady, Stacy & Mantilla Montalvo, Rafael & Nicolescu, Razvan & Huth, Michael, 2018. "Analysing IoT cyber risk for estimating IoT cyber insurance," EconStor Conference Papers 193692, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Gabriel Kuper & Fabio Massacci & Woohyun Shim & Julian Williams, 2020. "Who Should Pay for Interdependent Risk? Policy Implications for Security Interdependence Among Airports," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 1001-1019, May.
    9. Wood, Matthew D. & Wells, Emily M. & Rice, Glenn & Linkov, Igor, 2019. "Quantifying and mapping resilience within large organizations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 117-126.
    10. Kong, Jingjing & Zhang, Chao & Simonovic, Slobodan P., 2021. "Optimizing the resilience of interdependent infrastructures to regional natural hazards with combined improvement measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    11. Niloofar Jahani & Arash Sepehri & Hadi Rezaei Vandchali & Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, 2021. "Application of Industry 4.0 in the Procurement Processes of Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    12. Igor Linkov & Sabrina Larkin & James H. Lambert, 2015. "Concepts and approaches to resilience in a variety of governance and regulatory domains," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 183-184, June.
    13. Petar Radanliev & David De Roure, 2021. "Epistemological and Bibliometric Analysis of Ethics and Shared Responsibility—Health Policy and IoT Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:41:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-021-09819-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.