IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i2d10.1007_s10668-021-01560-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reservoir operation under influence of the joint uncertainty of inflow and evaporation

Author

Listed:
  • Omid Bozorg-Haddad

    (University of Tehran)

  • Pouria Yari

    (University of Tehran)

  • Mohammad Delpasand

    (University of Tehran)

  • Xuefeng Chu

    (North Dakota State Univ., Dept 2470)

Abstract

Reservoirs play a major role as an essential source of surface water, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. To optimize the operation of a reservoir and determine its storage, which varies in time, the uncertainties of major influencing factors such as its inflow and evaporation should be considered. The objective of this study is to examine the effects of joint uncertainties of the inflow and evaporation of Durudzan reservoir on its performance for the first time. The Monte Carlo simulation is used for uncertainty assessment. Specifically, the monthly time series of inflow and evaporation were generated by using artificial neural networks and the standard operation policy was used for reservoir operation. Furthermore, the probabilistic distributions of four performance indices, including time-based reliability, volumetric reliability, vulnerability, and resiliency were calculated to assess the effects of the joint uncertainties of inflow and evaporation as well as the physical parameters on the reservoir variables (e.g., water release, storage, and spill). The results showed that the highest and lowest uncertainties of the reservoir water release occurred in July and May, respectively. In addition, the highest and lowest uncertainties were, respectively, observed in March and October for the reservoir storage, and in March and May for the water spill. The results also showed that the volumetric reliability had the highest uncertainty with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.158, while the resiliency had the lowest uncertainty with a CV of 0.020.

Suggested Citation

  • Omid Bozorg-Haddad & Pouria Yari & Mohammad Delpasand & Xuefeng Chu, 2022. "Reservoir operation under influence of the joint uncertainty of inflow and evaporation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2914-2940, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01560-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01560-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01560-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01560-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "Rejoinder on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 442-447, September.
    2. Mohammadjafar Soltanjalili & Omid Bozorg-Haddad & Migual Mariño, 2011. "Effect of Breakage Level One in Design of Water Distribution Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(1), pages 311-337, January.
    3. Omid Bozorg-Haddad & Mahboubeh Zarezadeh-Mehrizi & Mehri Abdi-Dehkordi & Hugo A. Loáiciga & Miguel A. Mariño, 2016. "A self-tuning ANN model for simulation and forecasting of surface flows," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(9), pages 2907-2929, July.
    4. B. Srdjevic & Y. Medeiros & A. Faria, 2004. "An Objective Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Water Management Scenarios," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 18(1), pages 35-54, February.
    5. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 361-411, September.
    6. Ashkan Shokri & Omid Bozorg Haddad & Miguel Mariño, 2013. "Algorithm for Increasing the Speed of Evolutionary Optimization and its Accuracy in Multi-objective Problems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(7), pages 2231-2249, May.
    7. C.-Y. Xu & V. Singh, 1998. "A Review on Monthly Water Balance Models for Water Resources Investigations," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 12(1), pages 20-50, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehdi Kazemi & Omid Bozorg-Haddad & Elahe Fallah-Mehdipour & Xuefeng Chu, 2022. "Optimal water resources allocation in transboundary river basins according to hydropolitical consideration," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1188-1206, January.
    2. Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna & Xiaojun Song & Qi Xu, 2022. "Covariate distribution balance via propensity scores," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(6), pages 1093-1120, September.
    3. Adam D. Bull, 2015. "Semimartingale detection and goodness-of-fit tests," Papers 1506.00088, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2016.
    4. Dong, Hao & Taylor, Luke, 2022. "Nonparametric Significance Testing In Measurement Error Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(3), pages 454-496, June.
    5. Xu Guo & Gao-Rong Li & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2018. "Specification Testing of Production in a Stochastic Frontier Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-10, August.
    6. Xu Guo & Wangli Xu & Lixing Zhu, 2015. "Model checking for parametric regressions with response missing at random," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(2), pages 229-259, April.
    7. Enno Mammen & Jens Perch Nielsen & Michael Scholz & Stefan Sperlich, 2019. "Conditional Variance Forecasts for Long-Term Stock Returns," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-22, November.
    8. José María Sarabia & Faustino Prieto & Vanesa Jordá & Stefan Sperlich, 2020. "A Note on Combining Machine Learning with Statistical Modeling for Financial Data Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Cuizhen Niu & Lixing Zhu, 2018. "A robust adaptive-to-model enhancement test for parametric single-index models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(5), pages 1013-1045, October.
    10. Eduardo García‐Portugués & Javier Álvarez‐Liébana & Gonzalo Álvarez‐Pérez & Wenceslao González‐Manteiga, 2021. "A goodness‐of‐fit test for the functional linear model with functional response," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(2), pages 502-528, June.
    11. Hira L. Koul & Fang Li, 2020. "Comparing two nonparametric regression curves in the presence of long memory in covariates and errors," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 83(4), pages 499-517, May.
    12. A. Meilán-Vila & R. Fernández-Casal & R. M. Crujeiras & M. Francisco-Fernández, 2021. "A computational validation for nonparametric assessment of spatial trends," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 2939-2965, December.
    13. Junmin Liu & Deli Zhu & Luoyao Yu & Xuehu Zhu, 2023. "Specification testing of partially linear single-index models: a groupwise dimension reduction-based adaptive-to-model approach," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(1), pages 232-262, March.
    14. Di Leo, Senatro & Caramuta, Pietro & Curci, Paola & Cosmi, Carmelina, 2020. "Regression analysis for energy demand projection: An application to TIMES-Basilicata and TIMES-Italy energy models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    15. J. S. Allison & M. Hušková & S. G. Meintanis, 2018. "Testing the adequacy of semiparametric transformation models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(1), pages 70-94, March.
    16. G. I. Rivas-Martínez & M. D. Jiménez-Gamero & J. L. Moreno-Rebollo, 2019. "A two-sample test for the error distribution in nonparametric regression based on the characteristic function," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1369-1395, August.
    17. Guo, Xu & Song, Lianlian & Fang, Yun & Zhu, Lixing, 2019. "Model checking for general linear regression with nonignorable missing response," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-12.
    18. Kohtaro Hitomi & Masamune Iwasawa & Yoshihiko Nishiyama, 2022. "Optimal minimax rates against nonsmooth alternatives [Optimal testing for additivity in multiple nonparametric regression]," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 25(2), pages 322-339.
    19. Ioannis Kyriakou & Parastoo Mousavi & Jens Perch Nielsen & Michael Scholz, 2020. "Longer-Term Forecasting of Excess Stock Returns—The Five-Year Case," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Sun, Zhihua & Chen, Feifei & Zhou, Xiaohua & Zhang, Qingzhao, 2017. "Improved model checking methods for parametric models with responses missing at random," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 147-161.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01560-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.