IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v83y2022i3d10.1007_s10589-022-00411-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Bregman proximal type algorithms for solving DC optimization problems

Author

Listed:
  • Shota Takahashi

    (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies)

  • Mituhiro Fukuda

    (University of São Paulo
    Tokyo Institute of Technology
    São Paulo State Technological College of Praia Grande
    Federal University of ABC)

  • Mirai Tanaka

    (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies
    The Institute of Statistical Mathematics
    Continuous Optimization Team, RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project)

Abstract

Difference of Convex (DC) optimization problems have objective functions that are differences between two convex functions. Representative ways of solving these problems are the proximal DC algorithms, which require that the convex part of the objective function have L-smoothness. In this article, we propose the Bregman Proximal DC Algorithm (BPDCA) for solving large-scale DC optimization problems that do not possess L-smoothness. Instead, it requires that the convex part of the objective function has the L-smooth adaptable property that is exploited in Bregman proximal gradient algorithms. In addition, we propose an accelerated version, the Bregman Proximal DC Algorithm with extrapolation (BPDCAe), with a new restart scheme. We show the global convergence of the iterates generated by BPDCA(e) to a limiting critical point under the assumption of the Kurdyka-Łojasiewicz property or subanalyticity of the objective function and other weaker conditions than those of the existing methods. We applied our algorithms to phase retrieval, which can be described both as a nonconvex optimization problem and as a DC optimization problem. Numerical experiments showed that BPDCAe outperformed existing Bregman proximal-type algorithms because the DC formulation allows for larger admissible step sizes.

Suggested Citation

  • Shota Takahashi & Mituhiro Fukuda & Mirai Tanaka, 2022. "New Bregman proximal type algorithms for solving DC optimization problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 893-931, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:83:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-022-00411-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-022-00411-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-022-00411-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-022-00411-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Horst & N. V. Thoai, 1999. "DC Programming: Overview," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 103(1), pages 1-43, October.
    2. Yurii Nesterov, 2018. "Lectures on Convex Optimization," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-319-91578-4, September.
    3. Heinz H. Bauschke & Jérôme Bolte & Marc Teboulle, 2017. "A Descent Lemma Beyond Lipschitz Gradient Continuity: First-Order Methods Revisited and Applications," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 330-348, May.
    4. Kai Tu & Haibin Zhang & Huan Gao & Junkai Feng, 2020. "A hybrid Bregman alternating direction method of multipliers for the linearly constrained difference-of-convex problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 665-693, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Jiang & Lieven Vandenberghe, 2023. "Bregman Three-Operator Splitting Methods," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 196(3), pages 936-972, March.
    2. Xiangyu Cui & Xun Li & Duan Li & Yun Shi, 2014. "Time Consistent Behavior Portfolio Policy for Dynamic Mean-Variance Formulation," Papers 1408.6070, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2015.
    3. Regina S. Burachik & Yaohua Hu & Xiaoqi Yang, 2022. "Interior quasi-subgradient method with non-Euclidean distances for constrained quasi-convex optimization problems in hilbert spaces," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 83(2), pages 249-271, June.
    4. A. Scagliotti & P. Colli Franzone, 2022. "A piecewise conservative method for unconstrained convex optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 251-288, January.
    5. Nadja Harms & Tim Hoheisel & Christian Kanzow, 2015. "On a Smooth Dual Gap Function for a Class of Player Convex Generalized Nash Equilibrium Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 659-685, August.
    6. Zamani, Moslem & Abbaszadehpeivasti, Hadi & de Klerk, Etienne, 2023. "The exact worst-case convergence rate of the alternating direction method of multipliers," Other publications TiSEM f30ae9e6-ed19-423f-bd1e-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. João Carlos O. Souza & Paulo Roberto Oliveira & Antoine Soubeyran, 2016. "Global convergence of a proximal linearized algorithm for difference of convex functions," Post-Print hal-01440298, HAL.
    8. Boglárka G.-Tóth & Kristóf Kovács, 2016. "Solving a Huff-like Stackelberg location problem on networks," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 233-247, February.
    9. Xin Jiang & Lieven Vandenberghe, 2022. "Bregman primal–dual first-order method and application to sparse semidefinite programming," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 127-159, January.
    10. Aras Selvi & Aharon Ben-Tal & Ruud Brekelmans & Dick den Hertog, 2022. "Convex Maximization via Adjustable Robust Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 2091-2105, July.
    11. Rafael Blanquero & Emilio Carrizosa & Amaya Nogales-Gómez & Frank Plastria, 2014. "Single-facility huff location problems on networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 175-195, November.
    12. J. X. Cruz Neto & P. R. Oliveira & A. Soubeyran & J. C. O. Souza, 2020. "A generalized proximal linearized algorithm for DC functions with application to the optimal size of the firm problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 313-339, June.
    13. M. Bierlaire & M. Thémans & N. Zufferey, 2010. "A Heuristic for Nonlinear Global Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 59-70, February.
    14. Andreas Löhne & Andrea Wagner, 2017. "Solving DC programs with a polyhedral component utilizing a multiple objective linear programming solver," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 369-385, October.
    15. N. V. Thoai, 2000. "Duality Bound Method for the General Quadratic Programming Problem with Quadratic Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 107(2), pages 331-354, November.
    16. Zhili Ge & Zhongming Wu & Xin Zhang & Qin Ni, 2023. "An extrapolated proximal iteratively reweighted method for nonconvex composite optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(4), pages 821-844, August.
    17. HyungSeon Oh, 2021. "Distributed optimal power flow," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-27, June.
    18. Zehui Jia & Jieru Huang & Xingju Cai, 2021. "Proximal-like incremental aggregated gradient method with Bregman distance in weakly convex optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 80(4), pages 841-864, August.
    19. Huiyi Cao & Kamil A. Khan, 2023. "General convex relaxations of implicit functions and inverse functions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 545-572, July.
    20. Masoud Ahookhosh, 2019. "Accelerated first-order methods for large-scale convex optimization: nearly optimal complexity under strong convexity," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 89(3), pages 319-353, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:83:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10589-022-00411-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.