IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v36y2021i2d10.1007_s00180-020-01037-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian bridge-randomized penalized quantile regression for ordinal longitudinal data, with application to firm’s bond ratings

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Zhu Tian

    (Northwest Normal University)

  • Man-Lai Tang

    (The Hang Seng University of Hong Kong)

  • Wai-Sum Chan

    (The Chinese University of Hong Kong)

  • Mao-Zai Tian

    (Renmin University of China)

Abstract

Empirical studies in various fields, such as clinical trials, environmental sciences, psychology, as well as finance and economics, often encounter the task of conducting statistical inference for longitudinal data with ordinal responses. In such situation, it may not be valid of using the orthodox modeling methods of continuous responses. In addition, most traditional methods of modeling longitudinal data tend to depict the average variation of the outcome variable conditionally on covariates, which may lead to non-robust estimation results. Quantile regression is a natural alternative for describing the impact of covariates on the conditional distributions of an outcome variable instead of the mean. Furthermore, in regression modeling, excessive number of covariates may be brought into the models which plausibly result in reduction of model prediction accuracy. It is desirable to obtain a parsimonious model that only retains significant and meaningful covariates. Regularized penalty methods have been shown to be efficient for conducting simultaneous variable selection and coefficient estimation. In this paper, Bayesian bridge-randomized penalty is incorporated into the quantile mixed effects models of ordinal longitudinal data to conduct parameter estimation and variable selection simultaneously. The Bayesian joint hierarchical model is established and an efficient Gibbs sampler algorithm is employed to perform posterior statistical inference. Finally, the proposed approach is illustrated using simulation studies and applied to an ordinal longitudinal real dataset of firm bond ratings.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Zhu Tian & Man-Lai Tang & Wai-Sum Chan & Mao-Zai Tian, 2021. "Bayesian bridge-randomized penalized quantile regression for ordinal longitudinal data, with application to firm’s bond ratings," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1289-1319, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:36:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s00180-020-01037-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-020-01037-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-020-01037-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-020-01037-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georges Bresson & Guy Lacroix & Mohammad Arshad Rahman, 2021. "Bayesian panel quantile regression for binary outcomes with correlated random effects: an application on crime recidivism in Canada," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 227-259, January.
    2. R. Alhamzawi & K. Yu & D. F. Benoit, 2011. "Bayesian adaptive Lasso quantile regression," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 11/728, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    3. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    4. Nicholas G. Polson & James G. Scott & Jesse Windle, 2014. "The Bayesian bridge," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 76(4), pages 713-733, September.
    5. Park, Trevor & Casella, George, 2008. "The Bayesian Lasso," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 681-686, June.
    6. Celine Marielle Laffont & Marc Vandemeulebroecke & Didier Concordet, 2014. "Multivariate Analysis of Longitudinal Ordinal Data With Mixed Effects Models, With Application to Clinical Outcomes in Osteoarthritis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(507), pages 955-966, September.
    7. A. Aghamohammadi & S. Mohammadi, 2017. "Bayesian analysis of penalized quantile regression for longitudinal data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1035-1053, December.
    8. Mohammad Arshad Rahman & Shubham Karnawat, 2019. "Flexible Bayesian Quantile Regression in Ordinal Models," Advances in Econometrics, in: Topics in Identification, Limited Dependent Variables, Partial Observability, Experimentation, and Flexible Modeling: Part B, volume 40, pages 211-251, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    9. Yu, Keming & Moyeed, Rana A., 2001. "Bayesian quantile regression," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 437-447, October.
    10. Stohs, Mark Hoven & Mauer, David C, 1996. "The Determinants of Corporate Debt Maturity Structure," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(3), pages 279-312, July.
    11. Zou, Hui, 2006. "The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1418-1429, December.
    12. Mohammad Arshad Rahman & Angela Vossmeyer, 2019. "Estimation and Applications of Quantile Regression for Binary Longitudinal Data," Advances in Econometrics, in: Topics in Identification, Limited Dependent Variables, Partial Observability, Experimentation, and Flexible Modeling: Part B, volume 40, pages 157-191, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    13. F. Razie & E. Bahrami Samani & M. Ganjali, 2017. "Latent variable model for mixed correlated power series and ordinal longitudinal responses with non ignorable missing values," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(12), pages 5738-5753, June.
    14. Li C. Liu & Donald Hedeker, 2006. "A Mixed-Effects Regression Model for Longitudinal Multivariate Ordinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 261-268, March.
    15. Reich, Brian J. & Fuentes, Montserrat & Dunson, David B., 2011. "Bayesian Spatial Quantile Regression," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 6-20.
    16. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    17. Yuzhu Tian & Er’qian Li & Maozai Tian, 2016. "Bayesian joint quantile regression for mixed effects models with censoring and errors in covariates," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 1031-1057, September.
    18. Himel Mallick & Nengjun Yi, 2018. "Bayesian bridge regression," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 988-1008, April.
    19. Rahim Alhamzawi & Haithem Taha Mohammad Ali, 2018. "Bayesian quantile regression for ordinal longitudinal data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 815-828, April.
    20. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 768-768, November.
    21. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 301-320, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian, Yuzhu & Song, Xinyuan, 2020. "Bayesian bridge-randomized penalized quantile regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. van Erp, Sara & Oberski, Daniel L. & Mulder, Joris, 2018. "Shrinkage priors for Bayesian penalized regression," OSF Preprints cg8fq, Center for Open Science.
    3. Dries Benoit & Rahim Alhamzawi & Keming Yu, 2013. "Bayesian lasso binary quantile regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 2861-2873, December.
    4. Yu-Zhu Tian & Man-Lai Tang & Mao-Zai Tian, 2021. "Bayesian joint inference for multivariate quantile regression model with L $$_{1/2}$$ 1 / 2 penalty," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 2967-2994, December.
    5. Taha Alshaybawee & Habshah Midi & Rahim Alhamzawi, 2017. "Bayesian elastic net single index quantile regression," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 853-871, April.
    6. Dengluan Dai & Anmin Tang & Jinli Ye, 2023. "High-Dimensional Variable Selection for Quantile Regression Based on Variational Bayesian Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Mohit Batham & Soudeh Mirghasemi & Mohammad Arshad Rahman & Manini Ojha, 2021. "Modeling and Analysis of Discrete Response Data: Applications to Public Opinion on Marijuana Legalization in the United States," Papers 2109.10122, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    8. Zhang, Ting & Wang, Lei, 2020. "Smoothed empirical likelihood inference and variable selection for quantile regression with nonignorable missing response," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    9. Ricardo P. Masini & Marcelo C. Medeiros & Eduardo F. Mendes, 2023. "Machine learning advances for time series forecasting," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 76-111, February.
    10. Jiang, Liewen & Bondell, Howard D. & Wang, Huixia Judy, 2014. "Interquantile shrinkage and variable selection in quantile regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 208-219.
    11. Philip Kostov & Thankom Arun & Samuel Annim, 2014. "Financial Services to the Unbanked: the case of the Mzansi intervention in South Africa," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 8(2), June.
    12. Georges Bresson & Guy Lacroix & Mohammad Arshad Rahman, 2021. "Bayesian panel quantile regression for binary outcomes with correlated random effects: an application on crime recidivism in Canada," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 227-259, January.
    13. Ruggieri, Eric & Lawrence, Charles E., 2012. "On efficient calculations for Bayesian variable selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1319-1332.
    14. Mogliani, Matteo & Simoni, Anna, 2021. "Bayesian MIDAS penalized regressions: Estimation, selection, and prediction," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 833-860.
    15. Young Joo Yoon & Cheolwoo Park & Erik Hofmeister & Sangwook Kang, 2012. "Group variable selection in cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation data for veterinary patients," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 1605-1621, January.
    16. Posch, Konstantin & Arbeiter, Maximilian & Pilz, Juergen, 2020. "A novel Bayesian approach for variable selection in linear regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    17. Bernardi, Mauro & Bottone, Marco & Petrella, Lea, 2018. "Bayesian quantile regression using the skew exponential power distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 92-111.
    18. Tanin Sirimongkolkasem & Reza Drikvandi, 2019. "On Regularisation Methods for Analysis of High Dimensional Data," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 737-763, December.
    19. Yuzhu Tian & Manlai Tang & Yanchao Zang & Maozai Tian, 2018. "Quantile regression for linear models with autoregressive errors using EM algorithm," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1605-1625, December.
    20. Yazhao Lv & Riquan Zhang & Weihua Zhao & Jicai Liu, 2014. "Quantile regression and variable selection for the single-index model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 1565-1577, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:36:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s00180-020-01037-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.