IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v19y2021i5d10.1007_s40258-021-00671-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Much Money Should be Paid for a Patient to Isolate During the COVID-19 Outbreak? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Enayatollah Homaie Rad

    (Guilan University of Medical Sciences)

  • Mohammad Hajizadeh

    (Dalhousie University)

  • Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi

    (Kerman University of Medical Sciences
    Kerman University of Medical Sciences)

  • Sajad Delavari

    (Shiraz University of Medical Sciences)

  • Zahra Mohtasham-Amiri

    (Guilan University of Medical Sciences)

Abstract

Introduction Isolation of COVID-19 patients is a vital strategy for preventing the spread of the virus. Isolation without any incentive or compensation for the patients cannot be effective. We sought to find the monetary value of the willingness to accept (WTA) being isolated for COVID-19 in Iran. Methods In this discrete choice experiment, scenarios were designed by reviewing the literature and semi-structural interviews. Fourteen choice sets with two scenarios were included in an internet-based questionnaire that was sent to the Telegram Social Network. A total of 617 individuals completed the questionnaire. A random-effects logistic regression model was used for the main analysis. Results The average monetary value of a WTA 7 days of isolation was US$51.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 43.09–60.33). The WTA for one day of isolation was US$1.48 (95% CI 1.11–1.85) for unemployed groups, US$1.49 (95% CI 1.18–1.79) for office employees and US$1.36 (95% CI 0.73–2.01) for manual workers. The WTA was 0.44 (95% CI 0.35–0.53) US$ for low-income groups, US$0.68 (95% CI 0.52–0.84) for middle-income groups and US$0.77 (95% CI 0.35–1.18) for high-income groups. Conclusions Our findings suggested that financial preferences for being isolated vary widely across individuals within different socioeconomic groups. Policymakers should consider these differences when designing effective intervention to increase compliance with the isolation protocols during infectious disease outbreaks.

Suggested Citation

  • Enayatollah Homaie Rad & Mohammad Hajizadeh & Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi & Sajad Delavari & Zahra Mohtasham-Amiri, 2021. "How Much Money Should be Paid for a Patient to Isolate During the COVID-19 Outbreak? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Iran," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 709-719, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:19:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s40258-021-00671-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00671-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-021-00671-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40258-021-00671-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ken Deal, 2014. "Segmenting Patients and Physicians Using Preferences from Discrete Choice Experiments," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 7(1), pages 5-21, March.
    2. Rothstein, M.A. & Talbott, M.K., 2007. "Encouraging compliance with quarantine: a proposal to provide job security and income replacement," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(S1), pages 49-556.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & de Bekker-Grob, Esther W., 2022. "Applications of discrete choice experiments in COVID-19 research: Disparity in survey qualities between health and transport fields," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandra Galbin, 2021. "Sensemaking in Social Construction of Organization. A Powerful Resource in Pandemic Context," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 308-318, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:19:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s40258-021-00671-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.