IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v82y1998i0p203-21810.1023-a1018906618608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency and the logit model

Author

Listed:
  • Sven Erlander

Abstract

This paper discusses model building for discrete choice problems in the simplest case - the logit model. General model building principles are formulated and used in evaluatingways of deriving logit choice probabilities. The principles include that models should representhuman behavior, and that the basic assumptions should be testable and refutable againstobservations. Three ways of deriving the logit model are considered; the Luce model, theadditive random utility maximizing approach, and the efficiency approach. The equivalenceof the logit formula and the independence of irrelevant alternatives assumption (the Lucemodel) is well known. It is also well known that the assumption of additive random utilitymaximization with extreme value distribution for the unobservable stochastic componentsimplies the logit formula. The opposite implication does not hold. The principal merit ofadditive random utility maximizing is its coherence with standard economic theory. Itsprincipal weakness is that the basic assumptions can not be tested, since the stochasticcomponents cannot be observed. The efficiency assumption - samples with higher totalobservable utility are more probable - is equivalent to the logit formula. The advantage ofthe efficiency approach lies in its simple, testable basic behavioral assumptions. The independenceof irrelevant alternatives assumption is equivalent to the efficiency assumption.The additive random utility maximization approach and the efficiency approach are notequivalent. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Suggested Citation

  • Sven Erlander, 1998. "Efficiency and the logit model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 82(0), pages 203-218, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:82:y:1998:i:0:p:203-218:10.1023/a:1018906618608
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1018906618608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1018906618608
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1018906618608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ge, Ge & Godager, Geir, 2021. "Predicting strategic medical choices: An application of a quantal response equilibrium choice model," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    2. Kalouptsidis, N. & Koutroumbas, K. & Psaraki, V., 2007. "Classification methods for random utility models with i.i.d. disturbances under the most probable alternative rule," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1778-1794, February.
    3. Jiayang Li & Zhaoran Wang & Yu Marco Nie, 2023. "Wardrop Equilibrium Can Be Boundedly Rational: A New Behavioral Theory of Route Choice," Papers 2304.02500, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:82:y:1998:i:0:p:203-218:10.1023/a:1018906618608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.