IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v308y2022i1d10.1007_s10479-020-03872-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial intelligence in healthcare operations to enhance treatment outcomes: a framework to predict lung cancer prognosis

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Johnson

    (Montclair State University)

  • Abdullah Albizri

    (Montclair State University)

  • Serhat Simsek

    (Montclair State University)

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is critical for data-driven decision making to increase resource utilization, operational performance, and service quality in various industry domains, particularly in healthcare. Using AI in healthcare operations can significantly improve treatment outcomes and enhance patient satisfaction while reducing costs. In this paper, we propose a multi-stage framework to build an AI-based decision support tool that can predict the 5-year survivability of lung cancer patients. We evaluate the proposed framework using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset pertaining to the 1973–2015 period obtained from the National Institutes of Health. The first stage entails data preprocessing and target creation. The second stage applies six AI algorithms with feature selection through Particle Swarm Optimization and hyperparameter tuning with Cross-Validation. These Algorithms include Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, Random Forests (RF), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Artificial Neural Network, and Naïve Bayes. The results show that RF and AdaBoost models yield an AUC rate of 0.94 and outperform the other models. Stage 3 utilizes permutation importance to interpret the RF and AdaBoost models and applies Tree-based Augmented Naïve Bayes to gain insights regarding the interrelations among important features. The results of Stage 3 delineate that the number of lymph nodes containing metastases), the number of tumors that patients have had in their lifetime, the patient’s age, and the microscopic composition of cells rank among the topmost important features and can significantly impact patient survivability. We think this study has significant practical implications in helping physicians predict prognosis and develop treatment plans for lung cancer patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Johnson & Abdullah Albizri & Serhat Simsek, 2022. "Artificial intelligence in healthcare operations to enhance treatment outcomes: a framework to predict lung cancer prognosis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 275-305, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:308:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-020-03872-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-020-03872-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-020-03872-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-020-03872-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ernst Wit & Edwin van den Heuvel & Jan-Willem Romeijn, 2012. "‘All models are wrong...’: an introduction to model uncertainty," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 66(3), pages 217-236, August.
    2. M. M. Malik & S. Abdallah & M. Ala’raj, 2018. "Data mining and predictive analytics applications for the delivery of healthcare services: a systematic literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 287-312, November.
    3. David L. Olson & Dursun Delen, 2008. "Advanced Data Mining Techniques," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-76917-0, December.
    4. Hoda Parvin & Piyush Goel & Natarajan Gautam, 2012. "An analytic framework to develop policies for testing, prevention, and treatment of two-stage contagious diseases," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 707-735, July.
    5. Anton Kocheturov & Panos M. Pardalos & Athanasia Karakitsiou, 2019. "Massive datasets and machine learning for computational biomedicine: trends and challenges," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 276(1), pages 5-34, May.
    6. Wallace J. Hopp & Jun Li & Guihua Wang, 2018. "Big Data and the Precision Medicine Revolution," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(9), pages 1647-1664, September.
    7. Camila Ramos & Alejandro Cataldo & Juan–Carlos Ferrer, 2020. "Appointment and patient scheduling in chemotherapy: a case study in Chilean hospitals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 411-439, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yikai Liu & Ruozheng Wu & Aimin Yang, 2023. "Research on Medical Problems Based on Mathematical Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Praveen Puram & Soumya Roy & Deepak Srivastav & Anand Gurumurthy, 2023. "Understanding the effect of contextual factors and decision making on team performance in Twenty20 cricket: an interpretable machine learning approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(1), pages 261-288, June.
    3. Kamyab Karimi & Ali Ghodratnama & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2023. "Two new feature selection methods based on learn-heuristic techniques for breast cancer prediction: a comprehensive analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 665-700, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matteo Cinelli & Valerio Ficcadenti & Jessica Riccioni, 2020. "The interconnectedness of the economic content in the speeches of the US Presidents," Papers 2002.07880, arXiv.org.
    2. Matteo Cinelli & Valerio Ficcadenti & Jessica Riccioni, 2021. "The interconnectedness of the economic content in the speeches of the US Presidents," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 593-615, April.
    3. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2022. "Designing AI‐augmented healthcare delivery systems for physician buy‐in and patient acceptance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4443-4451, December.
    4. Vangelis Marinakis & Themistoklis Koutsellis & Alexandros Nikas & Haris Doukas, 2021. "AI and Data Democratisation for Intelligent Energy Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Najmeddine Dhieb & Ismail Abdulrashid & Hakim Ghazzai & Yehia Massoud, 2023. "Optimized drug regimen and chemotherapy scheduling for cancer treatment using swarm intelligence," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 757-770, January.
    6. Mark Gilchrist & Deana Lehmann Mooers & Glenn Skrubbeltrang & Francine Vachon, 2012. "Knowledge Discovery in Databases for Competitive Advantage," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(2), pages 2-15, April.
    7. Bram Janssens & Matthias Bogaert & Mathijs Maton, 2023. "Predicting the next Pogačar: a data analytical approach to detect young professional cycling talents," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(1), pages 557-588, June.
    8. Francisco Richter & Bart Haegeman & Rampal S. Etienne & Ernst C. Wit, 2020. "Introducing a general class of species diversification models for phylogenetic trees," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 261-274, August.
    9. Mehri, Ali & Darooneh, Amir H. & Shariati, Ashrafalsadat, 2012. "The complex networks approach for authorship attribution of books," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(7), pages 2429-2437.
    10. Michał Jasiński & Tomasz Sikorski & Zbigniew Leonowicz & Klaudiusz Borkowski & Elżbieta Jasińska, 2020. "The Application of Hierarchical Clustering to Power Quality Measurements in an Electrical Power Network with Distributed Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Muhammad Ali Musarat & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Babar Ali Rabbani & Mujahid Ali & Muhammad Altaf & Roman Fediuk & Nikolai Vatin & Sergey Klyuev & Hamna Bukhari & Alishba Sadiq & Waqas Rafiq & Wa, 2021. "Kabul River Flow Prediction Using Automated ARIMA Forecasting: A Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    12. Ge Song & Jiahui Yuan & Charlie Cheng-Jie Ji, 2021. "Application of Gibbs Sampling in Modelling the Utilization Rate of Raw Materials for Drug Coating," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, March.
    13. Rubbio, Iacopo & Bruccoleri, Manfredi, 2023. "Unfolding the relationship between digital health and patient safety: The roles of absorptive capacity and healthcare resilience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    14. Minmin Zhang & Guihua Wang & Jun Li & Wallace J. Hopp & David D. Lee, 2023. "Pausing transplants in the face of a global pandemic: Patient survival implications," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(5), pages 1380-1396, May.
    15. Beni Rohrbach & Sharolyn Anderson & Patrick Laube, 2016. "The effects of sample size on data quality in participatory mapping of past land use," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(4), pages 681-697, July.
    16. Välilä, Timo, 2020. "Infrastructure and growth: A survey of macro-econometric research," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 39-49.
    17. Katherine Bobroske & Michael Freeman & Lawrence Huan & Anita Cattrell & Stefan Scholtes, 2022. "Curbing the Opioid Epidemic at Its Root: The Effect of Provider Discordance After Opioid Initiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 2003-2015, March.
    18. Jan Dvorsky & Martin Cepel & Gabriela Sopkova & Anna Kotaskova, 2017. "The Quality Of Macro-Environment And Business Environment And University Student Entrepreneurship - Comparison Of The Czech And The Slovak Republic," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 5(2), pages 89-100, December.
    19. Simsek, Serhat & Dag, Ali & Tiahrt, Thomas & Oztekin, Asil, 2021. "A Bayesian Belief Network-based probabilistic mechanism to determine patient no-show risk categories," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    20. Sebastian Büsch & Volker Nissen & Arndt Wünscher, 0. "Automatic classification of data-warehouse-data for information lifecycle management using machine learning techniques," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-15.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:308:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-020-03872-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.