IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v296y2021i1d10.1007_s10479-020-03567-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robustness-based approach for fuzzy multi-objective problems

Author

Listed:
  • Oumayma Bahri

    (Centre de Recherche Inria Lille - Nord Europe)

  • El-Ghazali Talbi

    (Centre de Recherche Inria Lille - Nord Europe)

Abstract

In recent years, reasoning under uncertainty in multi-objective problems has become an active research area. However, solving this kind of problems reveals many performance and robustness issues that have been so far been neglected. Most of existing studies in this area are focused on dealing with robustness in the field of mono-objective optimization. The aim of the present paper is to address robustness of multi-objective optimization problems over uncertain inputs data. In particular, we focus on the specific case of fuzziness propagation to the multiple objectives in such problems. Then in order to avoid the loss of efficiency of fuzzy-valued objective values, we introduce new robustness techniques combining fuzziness and multi-objective context.

Suggested Citation

  • Oumayma Bahri & El-Ghazali Talbi, 2021. "Robustness-based approach for fuzzy multi-objective problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 707-733, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:296:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-020-03567-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-020-03567-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-020-03567-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-020-03567-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    2. R.H. Tütüncü & M. Koenig, 2004. "Robust Asset Allocation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 157-187, November.
    3. S. Rivaz & M. Yaghoobi, 2013. "Minimax regret solution to multiobjective linear programming problems with interval objective functions coefficients," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 21(3), pages 625-649, September.
    4. Seong-Cheol Kang & Theodora Brisimi & Ioannis Paschalidis, 2015. "Distribution-dependent robust linear optimization with applications to inventory control," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 231(1), pages 229-263, August.
    5. A. L. Soyster, 1973. "Technical Note—Convex Programming with Set-Inclusive Constraints and Applications to Inexact Linear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 1154-1157, October.
    6. Ehrgott, Matthias & Ide, Jonas & Schöbel, Anita, 2014. "Minmax robustness for multi-objective optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 17-31.
    7. Jitka Dupačová & Miloš Kopa, 2012. "Robustness in stochastic programs with risk constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 200(1), pages 55-74, November.
    8. Dimitris Bertsimas & Omid Nohadani, 2010. "Robust optimization with simulated annealing," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 323-334, October.
    9. Chuen-Teck See & Melvyn Sim, 2010. "Robust Approximation to Multiperiod Inventory Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 583-594, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oğuz Solyalı & Jean-François Cordeau & Gilbert Laporte, 2016. "The Impact of Modeling on Robust Inventory Management Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 1188-1201, April.
    2. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Peng Xiong, 2020. "Robust Stochastic Optimization Made Easy with RSOME," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(8), pages 3329-3339, August.
    3. Jonas Ide & Anita Schöbel, 2016. "Robustness for uncertain multi-objective optimization: a survey and analysis of different concepts," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 235-271, January.
    4. Jiankun Sun & Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2019. "Robust Dual Sourcing Inventory Management: Optimality of Capped Dual Index Policies and Smoothing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 912-931, October.
    5. Gianfranco Guastaroba & Gautam Mitra & M Grazia Speranza, 2011. "Investigating the effectiveness of robust portfolio optimization techniques," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(4), pages 260-280, September.
    6. Klamroth, Kathrin & Köbis, Elisabeth & Schöbel, Anita & Tammer, Christiane, 2017. "A unified approach to uncertain optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 403-420.
    7. Seong-Cheol Kang & Theodora Brisimi & Ioannis Paschalidis, 2015. "Distribution-dependent robust linear optimization with applications to inventory control," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 231(1), pages 229-263, August.
    8. Erin K. Doolittle & Hervé L. M. Kerivin & Margaret M. Wiecek, 2018. "Robust multiobjective optimization with application to Internet routing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 487-525, December.
    9. Jang Ho Kim & Woo Chang Kim & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2014. "Recent Developments in Robust Portfolios with a Worst-Case Approach," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 103-121, April.
    10. Oğuz Solyalı & Jean-François Cordeau & Gilbert Laporte, 2012. "Robust Inventory Routing Under Demand Uncertainty," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 327-340, August.
    11. Curcio, Eduardo & Amorim, Pedro & Zhang, Qi & Almada-Lobo, Bernardo, 2018. "Adaptation and approximate strategies for solving the lot-sizing and scheduling problem under multistage demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 81-96.
    12. Raith, Andrea & Schmidt, Marie & Schöbel, Anita & Thom, Lisa, 2018. "Multi-objective minmax robust combinatorial optimization with cardinality-constrained uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 628-642.
    13. Hombach, Laura Elisabeth & Büsing, Christina & Walther, Grit, 2018. "Robust and sustainable supply chains under market uncertainties and different risk attitudes – A case study of the German biodiesel market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 302-312.
    14. Ban Kawas & Aurelie Thiele, 2017. "Log-robust portfolio management with parameter ambiguity," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 229-256, April.
    15. Alireza Ghahtarani & Ahmed Saif & Alireza Ghasemi, 2021. "Robust Portfolio Selection Problems: A Comprehensive Review," Papers 2103.13806, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    16. Khodamoradi, T. & Salahi, M. & Najafi, A.R., 2020. "Robust CCMV model with short selling and risk-neutral interest rate," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 547(C).
    17. Carrizosa, Emilio & Goerigk, Marc & Schöbel, Anita, 2017. "A biobjective approach to recoverable robustness based on location planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 421-435.
    18. Yue Zhou-Kangas & Kaisa Miettinen, 2019. "Decision making in multiobjective optimization problems under uncertainty: balancing between robustness and quality," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(2), pages 391-413, June.
    19. Mehdi Karimi & Somayeh Moazeni & Levent Tunçel, 2018. "A Utility Theory Based Interactive Approach to Robustness in Linear Optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 811-842, April.
    20. Wenqing Chen & Melvyn Sim & Jie Sun & Chung-Piaw Teo, 2010. "From CVaR to Uncertainty Set: Implications in Joint Chance-Constrained Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 470-485, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:296:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-020-03567-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.