IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v284y2020i1d10.1007_s10479-019-03180-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polyhedral results for position-based scheduling of chains on a single machine

Author

Listed:
  • Markó Horváth

    (Hungarian Academy of Sciences)

  • Tamás Kis

    (Hungarian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

We consider a scheduling problem, where a set of unit-time jobs has to be sequenced on a single machine without any idle times between the jobs. Preemption of processing is not allowed. The processing cost of a job is determined by the position in the sequence, i.e., for each job and each position, there is an associated weight, and one has to determine a sequence of jobs which minimizes the total weight incurred by the positions of the jobs. In addition, the ordering of the jobs must satisfy the given chain-precedence constraints. In this paper we show that this problem is NP-hard even in a special case, where each chain consists of two jobs (2-chains). Further on, we study the polyhedron associated with the problem, and present a class of valid inequalities along with a polynomial-time separation procedure, and show that some of these inequalities are facet-defining in the special case of 2-chains. Finally, we present our computational results that confirm that separating these inequalities can significantly speed up a linear programming based branch-and-bound procedure to solve the problem with chains of two jobs.

Suggested Citation

  • Markó Horváth & Tamás Kis, 2020. "Polyhedral results for position-based scheduling of chains on a single machine," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 284(1), pages 283-322, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:284:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03180-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03180-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-019-03180-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-019-03180-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lenstra, J. K. & Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G., 1980. "Complexity results for scheduling chains on a single machine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 270-275, April.
    2. Joseph Y.-T. Leung & Gilbert H. Young, 1990. "Minimizing Total Tardiness on a Single Machine with Precedence Constraints," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 346-352, November.
    3. Han Hoogeveen & Petra Schuurman & Gerhard J. Woeginger, 2001. "Non-Approximability Results for Scheduling Problems with Minsum Criteria," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 157-168, May.
    4. H. W. Kuhn, 1955. "The Hungarian method for the assignment problem," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1‐2), pages 83-97, March.
    5. T. C. Hu, 1961. "Parallel Sequencing and Assembly Line Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(6), pages 841-848, December.
    6. Yingchao Zhao & Xiangtong Qi & Minming Li, 2016. "On scheduling with non-increasing time slot cost to minimize total weighted completion time," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 759-767, December.
    7. Guohua Wan & Xiangtong Qi, 2010. "Scheduling with variable time slot costs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(2), pages 159-171, March.
    8. Timkovsky, Vadim G., 2003. "Identical parallel machines vs. unit-time shops and preemptions vs. chains in scheduling complexity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(2), pages 355-376, September.
    9. J. K. Lenstra & A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, 1978. "Complexity of Scheduling under Precedence Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 22-35, February.
    10. A Bachman & A Janiak, 2004. "Scheduling jobs with position-dependent processing times," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(3), pages 257-264, March.
    11. Radosław Rudek, 2012. "Scheduling problems with position dependent job processing times: computational complexity results," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 491-516, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D. Prot & O. Bellenguez-Morineau, 2018. "A survey on how the structure of precedence constraints may change the complexity class of scheduling problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 3-16, February.
    2. Timkovsky, Vadim G., 2003. "Identical parallel machines vs. unit-time shops and preemptions vs. chains in scheduling complexity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(2), pages 355-376, September.
    3. Nodari Vakhania, 2001. "Tight Performance Bounds of CP-Scheduling on Out-Trees," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 445-464, December.
    4. C N Potts & V A Strusevich, 2009. "Fifty years of scheduling: a survey of milestones," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 41-68, May.
    5. Jiang, Xiaojuan & Lee, Kangbok & Pinedo, Michael L., 2021. "Ideal schedules in parallel machine settings," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 422-434.
    6. Peng Liu & Xiaoli Wang, 2017. "Maximum Lateness Scheduling on Two-Person Cooperative Games with Variable Processing Times and Common Due Date," Journal of Optimization, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-7, April.
    7. Klaus Heeger & Danny Hermelin & George B. Mertzios & Hendrik Molter & Rolf Niedermeier & Dvir Shabtay, 2023. "Equitable scheduling on a single machine," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 209-225, April.
    8. Michal Penn & Tal Raviv, 2021. "Complexity and algorithms for min cost and max profit scheduling under time-of-use electricity tariffs," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 83-102, February.
    9. Lenstra, J. K. & Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G., 1980. "An Introduction To Multiprocessor Scheduling," Econometric Institute Archives 272258, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    10. Rui Zhang, 2017. "Environment-Aware Production Scheduling for Paint Shops in Automobile Manufacturing: A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, December.
    11. José R. Correa & Martin Skutella & José Verschae, 2012. "The Power of Preemption on Unrelated Machines and Applications to Scheduling Orders," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 379-398, May.
    12. Gara-Ali, Ahmed & Finke, Gerd & Espinouse, Marie-Laure, 2016. "Parallel-machine scheduling with maintenance: Praising the assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 90-97.
    13. Felix Happach, 2021. "Makespan minimization with OR-precedence constraints," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 319-328, June.
    14. Tzafestas, Spyros & Triantafyllakis, Alekos, 1993. "Deterministic scheduling in computing and manufacturing systems: a survey of models and algorithms," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 397-434.
    15. Jia, Beizhen & Tierney, Kevin & Reinhardt, Line Blander & Pahl, Julia, 2022. "Optimal dual cycling operations in roll-on roll-off terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    16. Philippe Chrétienne, 2016. "On scheduling with the non-idling constraint," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 301-319, May.
    17. Weiqiang Shen & Chuanlin Zhang & Xiaona Zhang & Jinglun Shi, 2019. "A fully distributed deployment algorithm for underwater strong k-barrier coverage using mobile sensors," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(4), pages 15501477198, April.
    18. András Frank, 2005. "On Kuhn's Hungarian Method—A tribute from Hungary," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(1), pages 2-5, February.
    19. Kan Fang & Nelson Uhan & Fu Zhao & John Sutherland, 2016. "Scheduling on a single machine under time-of-use electricity tariffs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 199-227, March.
    20. Amit Kumar & Anila Gupta, 2013. "Mehar’s methods for fuzzy assignment problems with restrictions," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 27-44, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:284:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03180-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.