IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v109y2002i1p193-21110.1023-a1016304319551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local Nash Equilibrium in Multiparty Politics

Author

Listed:
  • Norman Schofield
  • Itai Sened

Abstract

We present a model of multi-party, “spatial” competition under proportional rule with both electoral and coalitional risk. Each party consists of a set of delegates with heterogeneous policy preferences. These delegates choose one delegate as leader or agent. This agent announces the policy declaration (or manifesto) to the electorate prior to the election. The choice of the agent by each party elite is assumed to be a local Nash equilibrium to a game form $$\tilde g$$ . This game form encapsulates beliefs of the party elite about the nature of both electoral risk and the post-election coalition bargaining game. It is demonstrated, under the assumption that $$\tilde g$$ is smooth, that, for almost all parameter values, a locally isolated, local Nash equilibrium exists. In the final section of the paper some empirical work is reviewed in order to obtain some insights into why parties do not simply converge to an electoral center in order to maximize expected vote shares. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Suggested Citation

  • Norman Schofield & Itai Sened, 2002. "Local Nash Equilibrium in Multiparty Politics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 193-211, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:109:y:2002:i:1:p:193-211:10.1023/a:1016304319551
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1016304319551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1016304319551
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1016304319551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Faruk Gul & Wolfgang Pesendorfer, 2016. "Policy Competition in Real-Time," Working Papers 2016-7, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    2. Norman Schofield & Gary Miller & Andrew Martin, 2003. "Critical Elections and Political Realignments in the USA: 1860–2000," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 51(2), pages 217-240, June.
    3. Patty, John Wiggs, 2005. "Local equilibrium equivalence in probabilistic voting models," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 523-536, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:109:y:2002:i:1:p:193-211:10.1023/a:1016304319551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.