IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sja/journl/v12y2023i3p439-446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European Court of Human Rights - Developer of Legal Doctrines. Theoretical Bases

Author

Listed:
  • Aurel Octavian PASAT

    (Transfrontier Faculty, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Romania.)

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to analyze the contribution of the European Court of Human Rights to its transformation into a viable solution for the protection of human rights, fulfilling its role as "developer of legal doctrines regarding human rights", a role conferred by the object and purpose of the European Convention on Human Rights, for the maintenance and development of the democratic society model. Moreover, the evolution of the European Court of Human Rights in the last two decades has undoubtedly had a major effect in order to mediate the applicants to access justice, but also on the national courts that must correctly interpret the Convention, in the cases that are subject to judgment, on the basis of the principle of subsidiarity.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurel Octavian PASAT, 2023. "European Court of Human Rights - Developer of Legal Doctrines. Theoretical Bases," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 12(3), pages 439-446, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:439-446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.adjuris.ro/revista/articole/An12v3/15.%20Aurel%20Pasat%20RO%20%20en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European Court of Human Rights; fundamental freedoms; jurisprudence; the principle of subsidiarity; the domestic legal system.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law
    • K38 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Human Rights Law; Gender Law; Animal Rights Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:439-446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssjarea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.