IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/seb/journl/v10y2012i2p131-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in Bulgaria

Author

Listed:
  • Motasam Tatahi

    (European Business School, London)

Abstract

In both economically developed and developing countries, privatisation, budget austerity measures and market liberalisations have become key aspects of structural reform programs in the last three decades. These three recommended policies were parts of a strong revival of classical and neo-classical schools of thought since the middle of the 1970s. Such programs aim to achieve higher microeconomic ­efficiency and foster economic growth, whilst also aspiring to reduce public sector borrowing requirements through the elimination of unnecessary subsidies. For firms to achieve superior performance a change in ownership from public (state ownership) to private has been recommended as a vital condition. To assess the ownership role, the economic performances of private, public and mixed enterprises in Bulgaria is compared through the use of factor analysis method. The extracted factors, using data of two years, 1998 and 2000, do not identify ownership as a key performance factor.

Suggested Citation

  • Motasam Tatahi, 2012. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in Bulgaria," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 10(2), pages 131-153.
  • Handle: RePEc:seb:journl:v:10:y:2012:i:2:p:131-153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.asecu.gr/Seeje/issue19/issue19-tatahi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. David Brown & John S. Earle & Almos Telegdy, 2006. "The Productivity Effects of Privatization: Longitudinal Estimates from Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 114(1), pages 61-99, February.
    2. Smith, Stephen C. & Cin, Beom-Cheol & Vodopivec, Milan, 1997. "Privatization Incidence, Ownership Forms, and Firm Performance: Evidence from Slovenia," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 158-179, October.
    3. Megginson, William L & Nash, Robert C & van Randenborgh, Matthias, 1994. "The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: An International Empirical Analysis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(2), pages 403-452, June.
    4. Kikeri, Sunita & Nellis, John & Shirley, Mary, 1994. "Privatization: Lessons from Market Economies," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 9(2), pages 241-272, July.
    5. Gupta, Nandini & Ham, Jhon C. & Svejnar, Jan, 2008. "Priorities and sequencing in privatization: Evidence from Czech firm panel data," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 183-208, February.
    6. Frydman, R. & Hessel, M. & Rapaczynski, A., 1998. "Why Ownership Matters?: Politicization and Entrepreneurship in the Restructuring of Enterprises in Central Europe," Working Papers 98-14, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
    7. Eckel, Catherine & Eckel, Doug & Singal, Vijay, 1997. "Privatization and efficiency: Industry effects of the sale of British Airways," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 275-298, February.
    8. Claessens,Constantijn A.*Djankov, Simeon, 1998. "Politicians and firms in seven central and eastern European countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1954, The World Bank.
    9. Vernon-Wortzel, Heidi & Wortzel, Lawrence H., 1989. "Privatization: Not the only answer," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 633-641, May.
    10. Shapiro, C. & Willing, D.R., 1990. "Economic Rationales For The Scope Of Privatization," Papers 41, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Discussion Paper.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Durdyev, Serdar & Ismail, Syuhaida, 2017. "The build-operate-transfer model as an infrastructure privatisation strategy for Turkmenistan," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 195-200.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Motasam Tatahi, 2013. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in Finland," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 5(3), pages 122-135.
    2. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in Italy," MPRA Paper 27059, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in France," MPRA Paper 27056, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in Norway," MPRA Paper 27060, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in the UK," MPRA Paper 27065, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise performance, privatization and the role of ownership in Finland," MPRA Paper 27055, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in the Netherlands," MPRA Paper 27067, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise performance, privatization and the role of ownership in Belgium," MPRA Paper 27051, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in Sweden," MPRA Paper 27066, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise performance, privatization and the role of ownership in Bulgaria," MPRA Paper 27054, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in Portugal," MPRA Paper 27063, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in Denmark," MPRA Paper 27064, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise performance, privatization and the role of ownership in Austria," MPRA Paper 27053, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise Performance, Privatization and the Role of Ownership in Poland," MPRA Paper 27062, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Tatahi, Motasam, 2010. "Enterprise performance, privatization and the role of ownership in Germany," MPRA Paper 27057, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Svejnar, Jan & Hagemejer, Jan & Tyrowicz, Joanna, 2018. "Are Rushed Privatizations Substandard? Analyzing Firm-level Privatization under Fiscal Pressure," CEPR Discussion Papers 12991, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Ádám Szentpéteri & Álmos Telegdy, 2010. "Political Selection Of Firms Into Privatization Programs. Evidence From Romanian Comprehensive Data," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 298-328, November.
    18. Laura Cabeza García & Silvia Gómez Ansón, 2012. "What Drives the Operating Performance of Privatised Firms?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 59(1), pages 1-27, February.
    19. Mauricio Garrón B. & Carlos Gustavo Machicado & Katherina Capra, 2003. "Privatization in Bolivia: The Impact on Firm Performance," Research Department Publications 3154, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    20. Jan Hagemejer & Joanna Tyrowicz, 2020. "A New Instrument for Measuring the Local Causal Effect of Privatisation on Firm Performance," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 35-52.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Informal Economy; Varieties of Capitalism; Employment Relations; South-East Europe;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm
    • L33 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprise and Nonprofit Institutions; Privatization; Contracting Out

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:seb:journl:v:10:y:2012:i:2:p:131-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ms. Melina Petromelidou (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asecuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.