Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Information Cost, Broker Compensation, and Collusion in Insurance Markets

Contents:

Author Info

  • Annette Hofmann/Martin Nell
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    We examine the impact of intermediation on insurance market transparency and performance. In a differentiated insurance market under imperfect information, consumers can gain information about product suitability by consulting an intermediary. We analyze current broker compensation methods: commissions and fees. Although insurers’ equilibrium profits are equivalent under both systems, social welfare is always higher under a fee-for-advice system than under a commission system. Both systems offer the opportunity to increase profits via collusion. Under a commission system, collusion enables insurers to separate consumers into groups purchasing different contracts. Insurers may then extract additional rents from some consumers. This advantage can explain why brokers tend to be compensated by insurers.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.vhb.de/sbr/pdfarchive.html
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by LMU Munich School of Management in its journal Schmalenbach Business Review.

    Volume (Year): 63 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 3 (July)
    Pages: 287-307

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:63:y:2011:i:3:p:287-307

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Muenchen
    Phone: 0049 89 2180 2166
    Fax: 0049 89 2180 6327
    Web page: http://www.sbr-online.com
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Collusion; Insurance Market; Intermediation.;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:63:y:2011:i:3:p:287-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (sbr).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.