IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v59y2022i5p974-994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Zinshaus market and gentrification dynamics: The transformation of the historic housing stock in Vienna, 2007–2019

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Musil

    (Institute for Urban and Regional Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences)

  • Florian Brand

    (Huemer&Brand architects, Vienna)

  • Hannes Huemer

    (Huemer&Brand architects, Vienna)

  • Maximilian Wonaschütz

    (Institute for Urban and Regional Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

This article intends to contribute to the debate on the quantification of gentrification, which is constrained by two main obstacles: firstly, the operationalisation of displacement of socially weak households, which appears as an elusive phenomenon. Secondly, the consideration of the specific urban context, in particular the regulation of the housing market. Based on a case study for Vienna, this paper introduces a new empirical approach, which does not focus on households, but on the tenement conversion of the historic housing stock. Here, the transformation as legal conversion and demolition of historic tenement houses (German: Zinshäuser ) serve as an alternative indicator for the operationalisation and quantification of displacement processes. The empirical analysis of Zinshaus transformations observed for 2007-2019 for the first time provides an estimation of gentrification dynamics in Vienna. Results point to a pronounced cyclicality in transformation dynamics. Hence, spatial cluster and hotspot analyses reveal a strong concentration of Zinshaus transformations and a clear shift from central bourgeois to peripheral working-class neighbourhoods. Further, a multilinear regression model confirms the impact of Zinshaus transformations on the social dynamics in these neighbourhoods. However, data do not indicate a social shift triggered by upper-class households, but by new migrant groups and well-educated middle-class households. Beyond the case of Vienna, this analysis underlines the relevance of quantitative gentrification approaches based on housing-market segments and their conversion. It proposes applying the Zinshaus as an indicator to make the variety of the urban context visible.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Musil & Florian Brand & Hannes Huemer & Maximilian Wonaschütz, 2022. "The Zinshaus market and gentrification dynamics: The transformation of the historic housing stock in Vienna, 2007–2019," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(5), pages 974-994, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:5:p:974-994
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980211051906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980211051906
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980211051906?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willem R. Boterman & Wouter P.C. Gent, 2014. "Housing Liberalisation and Gentrification: The Social Effects of Tenure Conversions in Amsterdam," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(2), pages 140-160, April.
    2. Jan Kubeš & Zoltán Kovács, 2020. "The kaleidoscope of gentrification in post-socialist cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(13), pages 2591-2611, October.
    3. D. Asher Ghertner, 2015. "Why gentrification theory fails in 'much of the world'," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 552-563, August.
    4. Kasey Zapatka & Brenden Beck, 2021. "Does demand lead supply? Gentrifiers and developers in the sequence of gentrification, New York City 2009–2016," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(11), pages 2348-2368, August.
    5. Sue Easton & Loretta Lees & Phil Hubbard & Nicholas Tate, 2020. "Measuring and mapping displacement: The problem of quantification in the battle against gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 286-306, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tamara Premrov & Matthias Schnetzer, 2023. "Social mix and the city: Council housing and neighbourhood income inequality in Vienna," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(4), pages 752-769, March.
    2. Yvonne Franz & Elisabeth Gruber, 2022. "The Changing Role of Student Housing as Social Infrastructure," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 457-469.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Rigolon & Timothy Collins, 2023. "The green gentrification cycle," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(4), pages 770-785, March.
    2. devin michelle bunten & Benjamin Preis & Shifrah Aron-Dine, 2024. "Re-measuring gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(1), pages 20-39, January.
    3. Sai Balakrishnan, 2019. "Recombinant Urbanization: Agrarian–urban Landed Property and Uneven Development in India," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 617-632, July.
    4. Ingmar Pastak & Anneli KÄHRIK, 2021. "SYMBOLIC DISPLACEMENT REVISITED: Place‐making Narratives in Gentrifying Neighbourhoods of Tallinn," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 814-834, September.
    5. Hyun Bang Shin & Loretta Lees & Ernesto López-Morales, 2016. "Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 455-470, February.
    6. Zheng Wang & Jie Shen & Xiang Luo, 2023. "Can residents regain their community relations after resettlement? Insights from Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 962-980, April.
    7. Nilsson, Isabelle & Delmelle, Elizabeth C., 2023. "Smart growth as a luxury amenity? Exploring the relationship between the marketing of smart growth characteristics and neighborhood racial and income change," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    8. Chunhui Liu & Weixuan Song, 2019. "Perspectives of Socio-Spatial Differentiation from Soaring Housing Prices: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Seth Schindler & Jonathan Silver, 2019. "Florida in the Global South: How Eurocentrism Obscures Global Urban Challenges—and What We Can Do about It," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 794-805, July.
    10. Jeff Garmany & John Burdick, 2021. "‘An open secret’: Public housing and downward raiding in Rio de Janeiro," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(13), pages 2798-2813, October.
    11. Na’Taki Osborne Jelks & Viniece Jennings & Alessandro Rigolon, 2021. "Green Gentrification and Health: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-23, January.
    12. Yasser Jezzini & Ghiwa Assaf & Rayan H. Assaad, 2023. "Models and Methods for Quantifying the Environmental, Economic, and Social Benefits and Challenges of Green Infrastructure: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-40, May.
    13. Olga Tzanni & Paraskevas Nikolaou & Stella Giannakopoulou & Apostolos Arvanitis & Socrates Basbas, 2022. "Social Dimensions of Spatial Justice in the Use of the Public Transport System in Thessaloniki, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, November.
    14. Charles R. Collins & Forrest Stuart & Patrick Janulis, 2022. "Policing gentrification or policing displacement? Testing the relationship between order maintenance policing and neighbourhood change in Los Angeles," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 414-433, February.
    15. Merle Zwiers & Maarten van Ham & Reinout Kleinhans, 2019. "The effects of physical restructuring on the socioeconomic status of neighbourhoods: Selective migration and upgrading," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(8), pages 1647-1663, June.
    16. Magdalena Górczyńska, 2018. "Mechanisms of property ownership change and social change in inner-city Warsaw (Poland)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(13), pages 2803-2820, October.
    17. Ismail, Muhammad & Warsame, Abukar & Wilhelmsson, Mats, 2020. "Measuring Gentrification with Getis-Ord Statistics and Its Effect on Housing Prices in Neighboring Areas: The Case of Stockholm," Working Paper Series 20/19, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.
    18. Cody Hochstenbach & Willem R Boterman, 2017. "Intergenerational support shaping residential trajectories: Young people leaving home in a gentrifying city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(2), pages 399-420, February.
    19. Alex Ramiller, 2022. "Displacement through development? Property turnover and eviction risk in Seattle," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1148-1166, May.
    20. Mary Lawhon & Yaffa Truelove, 2020. "Disambiguating the southern urban critique: Propositions, pathways and possibilities for a more global urban studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(1), pages 3-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:5:p:974-994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.