IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v55y2018i5p1111-1120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crime, insecurity and corruption: Considering the growth of urban private security

Author

Listed:
  • Jeff Garmany

    (King’s College London, UK)

  • Ana Paula Galdeano

    (Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (Brazilian Center of Analysis and Planning), Brazil)

Abstract

We call into question the growing presence of private security companies (PSCs) in cities throughout the world. Though PSCs have grown enormously in recent decades, there exist few academic analyses to consider their broad-reaching effects. Researchers still have much to understand about the relationships between PSCs and changing patterns of urban development, governance and public security. PSCs are prevalent in both the Global North and South, yet their presence is perhaps most intense in emerging countries, where social inequality is high and public security is tenuous. As such, in this article we draw on specific examples from the city of São Paulo, Brazil, where demand is soaring for private security and PSCs operate in complicated networks between the state, private capital and organised crime. Our analysis draws attention to the paradoxes of urban private security, beginning with the fact that public insecurity is in fact good for PSC business. By reflecting on existing published resources – and making connections across several disciplines – our goals in this article are threefold: (1) to highlight the need for more research on PSCs in urban settings; (2) to draw attention to the ways private security is changing urban space, and; (3) to suggest that the growth of PSCs, rather than being representative of increased public security, may in some cases coincide with rising levels of urban crime and insecurity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeff Garmany & Ana Paula Galdeano, 2018. "Crime, insecurity and corruption: Considering the growth of urban private security," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 1111-1120, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:5:p:1111-1120
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098017732691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098017732691
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098017732691?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeff Garmany, 2014. "Space for the State? Police, Violence, and Urban Poverty in Brazil," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 104(6), pages 1239-1255, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piva da Silva, Mariana & Fraser, James A. & Parry, Luke, 2022. "From ‘prison’ to ‘paradise’? Seeking freedom at the rainforest frontier through urban–rural migration," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Jeff Garmany, 2017. "Strategies of conditional cash transfers and the tactics of resistance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(2), pages 372-388, February.
    3. Matthew Aaron Richmond & Jeff Garmany, 2016. "‘Post-Third-World City' or Neoliberal ‘City of Exception'? Rio de Janeiro in the Olympic Era," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 621-639, May.
    4. Peris Jones & Wangui Kimari, 2019. "Security beyond the men: Women and their everyday security apparatus in Mathare, Nairobi," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(9), pages 1835-1849, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:5:p:1111-1120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.