IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v51y2014i16p3365-3382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexible relations, frail contacts and failing demands: How community groups and local institutions interact in local governance in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Mandy de Wilde

    (Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, the Netherlands)

  • Menno Hurenkamp

    (Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, the Netherlands)

  • Evelien Tonkens

    (Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands)

Abstract

This paper explores the way community groups, central to new systems of local governance, are related to local institutions and how those relations influence them. We draw from two theoretical approaches – behavioural and institutional – that offer different answers to the question: what makes community groups thrive? Based on an analysis of 386 community groups in the Netherlands, we distinguish four types of groups: feather light, cooperative, networked and nested groups. Then, in a neighbourhood case study we focus on the relations between groups and local institutions to gain a deeper insight into the institutional dynamics of urban governance. Moreover, we combine the findings of both studies claiming that different groups need different things from local institutions, and that in the current NPM-driven world only the higher educated community groups have productive relationships with local institutions, while others are somewhere in between frail contacts and failing demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Mandy de Wilde & Menno Hurenkamp & Evelien Tonkens, 2014. "Flexible relations, frail contacts and failing demands: How community groups and local institutions interact in local governance in the Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(16), pages 3365-3382, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:51:y:2014:i:16:p:3365-3382
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098013519832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098013519832
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098013519832?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margit Mayer, 2003. "The onward sweep of social capital: causes and consequences for understanding cities, communities and urban movements," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 110-132, March.
    2. Karen Hibbitt & Peris Jones & Richard Meegan, 2001. "Tackling Social Exclusion: The Role of Social Capital in Urban Regeneration on Merseyside — From Mistrust to Trust?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 141-161, March.
    3. Justus Uitermark & Jan Willem Duyvendak, 2008. "Citizen Participation in a Mediated Age: Neighbourhood Governance in The Netherlands," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 114-134, March.
    4. Vivien Lowndes & David Wilson, 2001. "Social Capital and Local Governance: Exploring the Institutional Design Variable," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 49(4), pages 629-647, September.
    5. William Maloney & Graham Smith & Gerry Stoker, 2000. "Social Capital and Urban Governance: Adding a More Contextualized ‘Top‐down’ Perspective," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 48(4), pages 802-820, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas J.M. Mattijssen & Arjen A.E. Buijs & Birgit H.M. Elands & Bas J.M. Arts & Rosalie I. van Dam & Josine L.M. Donders, 2019. "The Transformative Potential of Active Citizenship: Understanding Changes in Local Governance Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gillian Bristow & Tom Entwistle & Frances Hines & Steve Martin, 2008. "New Spaces for Inclusion? Lessons from the ‘Three‐Thirds’ Partnerships in Wales," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 903-921, December.
    2. Joseph Leibovitz, 2003. "Institutional Barriers to Associative City-region Governance: The Politics of Institution-building and Economic Governance in 'Canada's Technology Triangle'," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(13), pages 2613-2642, December.
    3. Richard Lang & Andreas Novy, 2011. "Housing Cooperatives and Social Capital: The Case of Vienna," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2011_02, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    4. Nyamori, Robert Ochoki & Lawrence, Stewart R. & Perera, Hector B., 2012. "Revitalising local democracy: A social capital analysis in the context of a New Zealand local authority," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(7), pages 572-594.
    5. Tjitske Akkerman & Maarten Hajer & John Grin, 2004. "The Interactive State: Democratisation from Above?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52(1), pages 82-95, March.
    6. Anna Cento Bull & Bryn Jones, 2006. "Governance and Social Capital in Urban Regeneration: A Comparison between Bristol and Naples," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(4), pages 767-786, April.
    7. Borg, Riikka & Toikka, Arho & Primmer, Eeva, 2015. "Social capital and governance: a social network analysis of forest biodiversity collaboration in Central Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 90-97.
    8. Rhys Andrews, 2007. "Civic Culture and Public Service Failure: An Empirical Exploration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(4), pages 845-863, April.
    9. Leena K. Koivusilta, 2018. "Country-Level Investment in Cultural Opportunity Structures. A Potential Source of Health Differences Between 21 European Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 1091-1118, June.
    10. Gareth D. Leeves, 2014. "Increasing returns to education and the impact on social capital," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 449-470, October.
    11. Nick Bailey & Madeleine Pill, 2015. "Can the State Empower Communities through Localism? An Evaluation of Recent Approaches to Neighbourhood Governance in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(2), pages 289-304, April.
    12. Esin Özdemir & Ayda Eraydin, 2017. "Fragmentation in Urban Movements: The Role of Urban Planning Processes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 727-748, September.
    13. Gila Menahem & Gideon Doron & David Itzhak Haim, 2011. "Bonding and Bridging Associational Social Capital and the Financial Performance of Local Authorities in Israel," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(5), pages 659-681, June.
    14. Andrew McCulloch & John Mohan & Peter Smith, 2012. "Patterns of Social Capital, Voluntary Activity, and Area Deprivation in England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(5), pages 1130-1147, May.
    15. Sam Wong, 2008. "Building Social Capital in Hong Kong by Institutionalising Participation: Potential and Limitations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(7), pages 1413-1437, June.
    16. Alberto Batinti & Luca Andriani & Andrea Filippetti, 2019. "Local Government Fiscal Policy, Social Capital and Electoral Payoff: Evidence across Italian Municipalities," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 503-526, November.
    17. Chris Hastie, 2021. "The Perpetuation of Inequality: The Role of Community Engagement," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(3), pages 759-767, September.
    18. Tom Entwistle & Gillian Bristow & Frances Hines & Sophie Donaldson & Steve Martin, 2007. "The Dysfunctions of Markets, Hierarchies and Networks in the Meta-governance of Partnership," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(1), pages 63-79, January.
    19. David Ley, 2008. "The Immigrant Church as an Urban Service Hub," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(10), pages 2057-2074, September.
    20. Monika Egerer & Elsa Anderson, 2020. "Social-Ecological Connectivity to Understand Ecosystem Service Provision across Networks in Urban Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:51:y:2014:i:16:p:3365-3382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.