IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v42y2005i11p1991-2006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Swyngedouw

    (School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3TB, UK, erik.swyngedouw@geog.ox.ac.uk)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the fifth dimension of social innovation-i.e. political governance. Although largely neglected in the mainstream 'innovation' literature, innovative governance arrangements are increasingly recognised as potentially significant terrains for fostering inclusive development processes. International organisations like the EU and the World Bank, as well as leading grass-roots movements, have pioneered new and more participatory governance arrangements as a pathway towards greater inclusiveness. Indeed, over the past two decades or so, a range of new and often innovative institutional arrangements has emerged, at a variety of geographical scales. These new institutional 'fixes' have begun to challenge traditional state-centred forms of policy-making and have generated new forms of governance-beyond-the-state. Drawing on Foucault's notion of governmentality, the paper argues that the emerging innovative horizontal and networked arrangements of governance-beyond-the-state are decidedly Janus-faced. While enabling new forms of participation and articulating the state-civil society relationships in potentially democratising ways, there is also a flip side to the process. To the extent that new governance arrangements rearticulate the state-civil society relationship, they also redefine and reposition the meaning of (political) citizenship and, consequently, the nature of democracy itself. The first part of the paper outlines the contours of governance-beyond-the-state. The second part addresses the thorny issues of the state-civil society relationship in the context of the emergence of the new governmentality associated with governance-beyond-the-state. The third part teases out the contradictory way in which new arrangements of governance have created new institutions and empowered new actors, while disempowering others. It is argued that this shift from 'government' to 'governance' is associated with the consolidation of new technologies of government, on the one hand, and with profound restructuring of the parameters of political democracy on the other, leading to a substantial democratic deficit. The paper concludes by suggesting that socially innovative arrangements of governance-beyond-the-state are fundamentally Janus-faced, particularly under conditions in which the democratic character of the political sphere is increasingly eroded by the encroaching imposition of market forces that set the 'rules of the game'.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Swyngedouw, 2005. "Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 1991-2006, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:11:p:1991-2006
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980500279869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980500279869
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980500279869?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Le Gales, Patrick, 2002. "European Cities: Social Conflicts and Governance," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199252787.
    2. Tjitske Akkerman & Maarten Hajer & John Grin, 2004. "The Interactive State: Democratisation from Above?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52(1), pages 82-95, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hellmut Wollmann, 2006. "The Fall and Rise of the Local Community: A Comparative and Historical Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(8), pages 1419-1438, July.
    2. Walter J. Nicholls, 2005. "Power and Governance: Metropolitan Governance in France," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(4), pages 783-800, April.
    3. Alistair Cole, 2004. "Devolution and decentralization in Wales and Brittany: a framework for evaluation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 354-368, June.
    4. Matjaž Uršič & Blaž Križnik, 2012. "Comparing urban renewal in Barcelona and Seoul—urban management in conditions of competition among global cities," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 21-39, May.
    5. Marcus Andre Melo & Gianpaolo Baiocchi, 2006. "Deliberative Democracy and Local Governance: Towards a New Agenda," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 587-600, September.
    6. Anne Jensen, 2013. "Mobility Regimes and Borderwork in the European Community," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 35-51, February.
    7. Olivier Borraz & Peter John, 2004. "The Transformation of Urban Political Leadership in Western Europe," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 107-120, March.
    8. Lackowska Marta & Norris Donald F., 2017. "Metropolitan governance (or not!) in Poland and the United States," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 21(3), pages 114-123, September.
    9. Thomas Maloutas & Maro Pantelidou Malouta, 2004. "The glass menagerie of urban governance and social cohesion: concepts and stakes/concepts as stakes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 449-465, June.
    10. Wiebren Kuindersma & Froukje G Boonstra, 2010. "The Changing Role of the State in Dutch Regional Partnerships," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(6), pages 1045-1062, December.
    11. Scott A. Bollens, 2008. "Urbanism, Political Uncertainty and Democratisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1255-1289, May.
    12. Sara González & Patsy Healey, 2005. "A Sociological Institutionalist Approach to the Study of Innovation in Governance Capacity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 2055-2069, October.
    13. Mandy Lau, 2014. "Flexibility with a Purpose: Constructing the Legitimacy of Spatial Governance Partnerships," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(9), pages 1943-1959, July.
    14. Nanke Verloo, 2023. "Ignoring people: The micro-politics of misrecognition in participatory governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(7), pages 1474-1491, November.
    15. Tihomir Viderman, 2015. "REFINA-An Integrated and Multilevel Approach to Dealing with Land Consumption?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 550-567, March.
    16. N.A. Phelps & N. Parsons & D. Ballas & A. Dowling, 2006. "Business at the margins? Business interests in edge urban politics," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 362-383, June.
    17. Dietrich Fürst, 2005. "The role of experimental regionalism in rescaling the German state," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(7), pages 923-938, November.
    18. Philippe Koch, 2013. "Bringing Power Back In: Collective and Distributive Forms of Power in Public Participation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(14), pages 2976-2992, November.
    19. Michael Harloe & Beth Perry, 2004. "Universities, Localities and Regional Development: The Emergence of the ‘Mode 2’ University?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 212-223, March.
    20. Maurice Blanc & Justin Beaumont, 2005. "Local Democracy Within European Urban Development Programmes," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 96(4), pages 409-420, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:11:p:1991-2006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.