IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v40y2003i13p2687-2704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of 'Vision' in Neighbourhood Racial Segregation: A Variant of the Schelling Segregation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander J. Laurie

    (Department of Physics, Illinois Wesleyan University, Bloomington, IL 61702-2900, USA. alaurie@iwu.edu)

  • Narendra K. Jaggi

    (Department of Physics, Illinois Wesleyan University, Bloomington, IL 61702-2900, USA. njaggi@iwu.edu)

Abstract

The Schelling model of neighbourhood racial segregation is extended to include agents who can authentically 'see' their neighbours up to a distance R, called 'vision'. By exploring the consequences of systematically varying R, an understanding has been developed of how vision interacts with racial preferences and minority concentrations and leads to novel, complex segregation behaviour. Three regimes have been discovered: an unstable regime, where societies invariably segregate; a stable regime, where integrated societies remain stable; and an intermediate regime where a complex behaviour is observed. Detailed results are presented for the symmetrical case (which maximises conflict), where equal numbers of agents of two races occupy the same cityscape. The policy implications of these simulations are briefly indicated.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander J. Laurie & Narendra K. Jaggi, 2003. "Role of 'Vision' in Neighbourhood Racial Segregation: A Variant of the Schelling Segregation Model," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(13), pages 2687-2704, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:40:y:2003:i:13:p:2687-2704
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000146849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098032000146849
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098032000146849?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Clark, 1991. "Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: A test of the schelling segregation model," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 28(1), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Schelling, Thomas C, 1969. "Models of Segregation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 488-493, May.
    3. Henry Wasserman & Gary Yohe, 2001. "Segregation and the Provision of Spatially Defined Local Public Goods," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 45(2), pages 13-24, October.
    4. John Yinger, 1995. "Opening Doors: How to Cut Discrimination by Supporting Neighborhood Integration," Center for Policy Research Policy Briefs 3, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University.
    5. Vandell, Kerry D. & Harrison, Bennett, 1978. "Racial transition among neighborhoods: A simulation model incorporating institutional parameters," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 441-470, October.
    6. Joshua M. Epstein & Robert L. Axtell, 1996. "Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262550253, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Demetry, Marcos, 2017. "Segregation in Urban Areas: A Literature Review," Ratio Working Papers 304, The Ratio Institute.
    2. Flaminio Squazzoni, 2010. "The impact of agent-based models in the social sciences after 15 years of incursions," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 18(2), pages 197-234.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David O'Sullivan, 2009. "Changing Neighborhoods—Neighborhoods Changing," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(4), pages 498-530, May.
    2. Mark Fossett & Warren Waren, 2005. "Overlooked Implications of Ethnic Preferences for Residential Segregation in Agent-based Models," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 1893-1917, October.
    3. Florence Goffette-Nagot & Pablo Jensen & Sebastian Grauwin, 2009. "Dynamic models of residential segregation: Brief review, analytical resolution and study of the introduction of coordination," Post-Print halshs-00404400, HAL.
    4. Henry Wasserman & Gary Yohe, 2001. "Segregation and the Provision of Spatially Defined Local Public Goods," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 45(2), pages 13-24, October.
    5. Radi, Davide & Gardini, Laura & Avrutin, Viktor, 2014. "The role of constraints in a segregation model: The symmetric case," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 103-119.
    6. Antoni Rubi-Barcelo, 2013. "Categorical Segregation from a Game Theoretical Approach," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 14(1), pages 85-120, May.
    7. Laura Gardini & Davide Radi, 2018. "A piecewise smooth model of evolutionary game for residential mobility and segregation," Working Papers 1802, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2018.
    8. Gandica, Yerali & Gargiulo, Floriana & Carletti, Timoteo, 2016. "Can topology reshape segregation patterns?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 46-54.
    9. Joshua M. Epstein, 2007. "Agent-Based Computational Models and Generative Social Science," Introductory Chapters, in: Generative Social Science Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling, Princeton University Press.
    10. Giorgio Fagiolo & Mattia Guerini & Francesco Lamperti & Alessio Moneta & Andrea Roventini, 2017. "Validation of Agent-Based Models in Economics and Finance," LEM Papers Series 2017/23, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    11. John Lynham & Philip R Neary, 2021. "Tiebout Meets Schelling Online: Sorting in Cybercommunities," Papers 2110.05608, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    12. Abhinav Singh & Dmitri Vainchtein & Howard Weiss, 2009. "Schelling's Segregation Model: Parameters, scaling, and aggregation," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 21(12), pages 341-366.
    13. Furtado, Bernardo Alves & Eberhardt, Isaque Daniel Rocha, 2015. "Modelo espacial simples da economia: uma proposta teórico-metodológica [A simple spatial economic model: a proposal]," MPRA Paper 67005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Roy Cerqueti & Luca De Benedictis & Valerio Leone Sciabolazza, 2022. "Segregation with social linkages: Evaluating Schelling’s model with networked individuals," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 384-440, May.
    15. Itzhak Omer, 2005. "How Ethnicity Influences Residential Distributions: An Agent-Based Simulation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 32(5), pages 657-672, October.
    16. N. Emrah Aydinonat, 2005. "An interview with Thomas C. Schelling: Interpretation of game theory and the checkerboard model," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 2(2), pages 1-7.
    17. Bithell, M. & Macmillan, W.D., 2007. "Escape from the cell: Spatially explicit modelling with and without grids," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 59-78.
    18. Logan, Trevon D. & Parman, John M., 2017. "The National Rise in Residential Segregation," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 77(1), pages 127-170, March.
    19. Zakaria Babutsidze, 2012. "Consumer Learning through Interaction: Effects on Aggregate Outcomes," Chapters, in: Guido Buenstorf (ed.), Evolution, Organization and Economic Behavior, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Pancs, Romans & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2007. "Schelling's spatial proximity model of segregation revisited," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-2), pages 1-24, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:40:y:2003:i:13:p:2687-2704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.