IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v38y2001i8p1273-1304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voucher Recipient Achievement of Improved Housing Conditions in the US: Do Moving Distance and Relocation Services Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • David P. Varady

    (School of Planning, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA, david.varady@uc.edu)

  • Carole C. Walker

    (Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 33 Livingston Avenue, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-1982, USA, cawalker@rci.rutgers.edu)

  • Xinhao Wang

    (School of Planning, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA, xinhao.wang@uc.edu.)

Abstract

When householders are vouchered-out from distressed, federally subsidised private developments in the US and receive moderate relocation counselling, does that counselling lead to a more intensive housing search, longer-distance moves and higher levels of housing satisfaction ? Multiple regression analysis was applied to a data-set containing survey and geographical information (for example, distance moved, median neighbourhood income level) for 201 voucher recipients in 4 cities. The analysis was used to determine if the use of relocation counselling services (as well as the type of services utilised) and distance moved helped to explain variations in housing satisfaction. Those who used counselling services were in fact more likely to be satisfied with their new home than were those who were unaware of these services. However, those who were aware of the services but did not use them fared as well as householders who used them. Counselling to help in dealings with landlords was the most influential type of relocation assistance vas à vis housing satisfaction. The distance householders moved played an insignificant role in the analysis. This finding undoubtedly reflects the fact that voucher recipients sought to remain in or close to their original neighbourhood to be near friends and relatives and familiar bus lines, and the fact that better housing units offering a greater sense of safety were available in the same neighbourhood or in neighbourhoods adjacent to the vouchered-out development. Implications for HUD's vouchering-out policy are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • David P. Varady & Carole C. Walker & Xinhao Wang, 2001. "Voucher Recipient Achievement of Improved Housing Conditions in the US: Do Moving Distance and Relocation Services Matter?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(8), pages 1273-1304, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:38:y:2001:i:8:p:1273-1304
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980124918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980124918
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980124918?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael R. Greenberg, 1999. "Improving neighborhood quality: A hierarchy of needs," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 601-624, January.
    2. George Galster, 1985. "Evaluating indicators for housing policy: Residential satisfaction vs marginal improvement priorities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 415-448, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tuyen Quang Tran & Huong Vu, 2018. "A microeconometric analysis of housing and life satisfaction among the Vietnamese elderly," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 849-867, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvia Jansen, 2013. "Why is Housing Always Satisfactory? A Study into the Impact of Preference and Experience on Housing Appreciation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 785-805, September.
    2. Squires, Graham & Hutchison, Norman, 2021. "Barriers to affordable housing on brownfield sites," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Eziyi O. Ibem & Pearl A. Opoko & Egidario B. Aduwo, 2017. "Satisfaction with Neighbourhood Environments in Public Housing: Evidence from Ogun State, Nigeria," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 733-757, January.
    4. Eziyi Ibem & Dolapo Amole, 2013. "Residential Satisfaction in Public Core Housing in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 563-581, August.
    5. Belinda Yuen & Anthony Yeh & Stephen John Appold & George Earl & John Ting & Lanny Kurnianingrum Kwee, 2006. "High-rise Living in Singapore Public Housing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(3), pages 583-600, March.
    6. Shilpi Mittal & Jayprakash Chadchan & Sudipta K. Mishra, 2020. "Review of Concepts, Tools and Indices for the Assessment of Urban Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 187-214, May.
    7. Rasheed Osuolale Oladosu & Mohammed Abdulkadir & Mohammed Abdulkadir, 2023. "Contextual Reports on Residential Satisfaction Studies from Developing Countries: Review Highlights," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(5), pages 1765-1777, May.
    8. Michael R. Greenberg, 2021. "Measuring Historical Urban Neighborhood Sustainability: America’s Grand Avenues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    9. John Hipp, 2010. "What is the ‘Neighbourhood’ in Neighbourhood Satisfaction? Comparing the Effects of Structural Characteristics Measured at the Micro-neighbourhood and Tract Levels," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(12), pages 2517-2536, November.
    10. Benoît Gauthier, 1987. "Client satisfaction in program evaluation," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 229-254, May.
    11. Greenberg, Michael & Crossney, Kristen, 2007. "Perceived neighborhood quality in the United States: Measuring outdoor, housing and jurisdictional influences," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 181-194, September.
    12. Michael Greenberg & M. Jane Lewis, 2000. "Brownfields Redevelopment, Preferences and Public Involvement: A Case Study of an Ethnically Mixed Neighbourhood," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(13), pages 2501-2514, December.
    13. Tina Davoodi & Balkiz Yapicoglu & Uğur Ulaş Dağlı, 2023. "Measuring Residential Satisfaction in Historic Areas Using Actual–Aspiration Gap Theory: The Case of Famagusta, Northern Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, February.
    14. Tina Davoodi & Uğur Ulaş Dağlı, 2019. "Exploring the Determinants of Residential Satisfaction in Historic Urban Quarters: Towards Sustainability of the Walled City Famagusta, North Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    15. Alima Tovesi Dennis & Kiplagat Andrew, 2020. "Residential Satisfaction in Low, Medium and High-Density Neighbourhoods: The Case of Eldoret Municipality, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(9), pages 261-271, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:38:y:2001:i:8:p:1273-1304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.