IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v18y2013i2p144-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Health and Social Legacy for East London: Narratives of ‘Problem’ and ‘Solution’ around London 2012

Author

Listed:
  • Claire Thompson
  • Daniel Lewis
  • Trisha Greenhalgh
  • Stephanie Taylor
  • Steven Cummins

Abstract

Policies and programmes that tackle neighbourhood deprivation have long been a feature of urban policy in the UK and elsewhere. Large-scale urban regeneration and neighbourhood renewal programmes have been deployed as the primary vehicle to improve the health and life chances of residents of deprived neighbourhoods. Often these areas have a long history of efforts at regeneration and redevelopment and, over time, have become labelled as ‘problem areas’ in need of constant intervention. The bid for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games was successful partly due to its promise to deliver a lasting health and social legacy by using the Games as a driver of regeneration in East London. Despite limited evidence for the effectiveness of such an approach, regeneration schemes tied to sporting events have emerged as popular strategies through which cities strive to enhance their urban fabric. Running through the core of the London 2012 bid was a discourse of East London as a ‘problem’ in need of a regeneration ‘solution’ that the Olympics uniquely could deliver. As a result, a wider narrative of East London was generated: as unhealthy; mired in poverty; desperate for jobs; with an inadequate and outdated built environment. The Olympic legacy was thus positioned as a unique once-in-a-lifetime solution ‘accelerating’ regeneration in East London, and delivering substantive change that either might not have happened, or would otherwise have taken decades. Through documentary analysis of published Government policy documents for the period 2002-2011, we demonstrate how the ‘problem’ of East London was used as political justification for London 2012. We argue that the Olympic legacy was deliberately positioned in neoliberal terms in order to justify substantial economic investment by the UK government and suit the needs of the International Olympic Committee. Finally, whilst acknowledging that regeneration may indeed result, we also speculate on the potential legacy and possible challenges for the people in East London left by this neoliberal and entrepreneurial strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire Thompson & Daniel Lewis & Trisha Greenhalgh & Stephanie Taylor & Steven Cummins, 2013. "A Health and Social Legacy for East London: Narratives of ‘Problem’ and ‘Solution’ around London 2012," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(2), pages 144-149, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:18:y:2013:i:2:p:144-149
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.2966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.2966
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.2966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I Turok, 1992. "Property-Led Urban Regeneration: Panacea or Placebo?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(3), pages 361-379, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N A Phelps, 1997. "A Hazard of New Fortunes: The Built Environment and Economic Development in Croydon," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 24(5), pages 643-645, October.
    2. Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, 2016. "City-as-a-Platform: The Rise of Participatory Innovation Platforms in Finnish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-31, September.
    3. Winifred Curran, 2004. "Gentrification and the Nature of Work: Exploring the Links in Williamsburg, Brooklyn," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(7), pages 1243-1258, July.
    4. Manuel Fernández-García & Clemente J. Navarro & Irene Gómez-Ramirez, 2021. "Evaluating Territorial Targets of European Integrated Urban Policy. The URBAN and URBANA Initiatives in Spain (1994–2013)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Levy, Deborah & Hills, Raewyn & Perkins, Harvey C. & Mackay, Michael & Campbell, Malcolm & Johnston, Karen, 2021. "Local benevolent property development entrepreneurs in small town regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. John Henneberry & Claire Roberts, 2008. "Calculated Inequality? Portfolio Benchmarking and Regional Office Property Investment in the UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1217-1241, May.
    7. Alastair Adair & Jim Berry & Stanley McGreal, 2003. "Financing Property's Contribution to Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(5-6), pages 1065-1080, May.
    8. John Edwards, 1995. "Social Policy and the City: A Review of Recent Policy Developments and Literature," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(4-5), pages 695-712, May.
    9. Laura Francis & Huw Thomas, 2006. "Evaluating Property-led Initiatives in Urban Regeneration: Tracing Vacancy Chains in Cardiff Bay," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 21(1), pages 49-64, February.
    10. S S Fainstein, 1994. "Government Programs for Commercial Redevelopment in Poor Neighborhoods: The Cases of Spitalfields in East London and Downtown Brooklyn, NY," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(2), pages 215-234, February.
    11. Edrissi, Ali & Poorzahedy, Hossain & Nassiri, Habibollah & Nourinejad, Mehdi, 2013. "A multi-agent optimization formulation of earthquake disaster prevention and management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 261-275.
    12. Peter Hall, 1997. "Regeneration Policies for Peripheral Housing Estates: Inward- and Outward-looking Approaches," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(5-6), pages 873-890, May.
    13. Jasper Beekmans & Huub Ploegmakers & Karel Martens & Erwin van der Krabben, 2016. "Countering decline of industrial sites: Do local economic development policies target the neediest places?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(14), pages 3027-3047, November.
    14. Patrick Loftman & Brendan Nevin, 1994. "Prestige project developments: Economic renaissance or economic myth? A case study of Birmingham," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 8(4), pages 307-325, February.
    15. Wu, Qiyan & Zhang, Xiaoling & Shang, Zhengyong & Li, Zaijun, 2015. "Political-economy based institutional industry complex and sustainable development: The case of the salt-chemical industry in Huai’an, China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 39-47.
    16. Moira Munro, 1993. "Evaluating the Links between Housing Change and Economic Change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 387-397, March.
    17. Kenneth Gibb & Martin Hoesli, 2003. "Developments in Urban Housing and Property Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(5-6), pages 887-896, May.
    18. Dimitris Ballas & Graham P Clarke, 2001. "Modelling the Local Impacts of National Social Policies: A Spatial Microsimulation Approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(4), pages 587-606, August.
    19. Nick Bailey & Douglas Robertson, 1997. "Housing Renewal, Urban Policy and Gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(4), pages 561-578, April.
    20. Ludovic Halbert & John Henneberry & Fotis Mouzakis, 2014. "Finance, Business Property and Urban and Regional Development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 421-424, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:18:y:2013:i:2:p:144-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.