IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v64y2018i8p745-755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Providing mental health peer support 2: Relationships with empowerment, hope, recovery, quality of life and internalised stigma

Author

Listed:
  • Eilish M Burke
  • Melissa Pyle
  • Karen Machin
  • Anthony P Morrison

Abstract

Objective: Qualitative research has identified personal costs and benefits for peer supporters associated with their role; however, quantitative evidence is sparse. This study used quantitative methods to explore relationships in experiences of providing peer support with constructs of empowerment, hope, recovery, quality of life and internalised stigma. Differences were examined for those in statutory versus non-statutory services; who had themselves received peer support versus those who had not and who identified having had negative experiences in clinical teams versus those without such experiences. Methods: A cross-sectional online and postal survey was undertaken in tandem with a linked consensus study. In all, 147 peer supporters were recruited from a variety of organisations across the United Kingdom. Validated questionnaires were used to examine constructs. Instruments created for the study measured peer support experiences, and personal costs and benefits involved. Correlations were calculated and results informed further regression analysis. Chi-square tests and independent samples t -tests tested group differences. Results: Peer supporters indicated they experienced almost twice as many role-related personal benefits than personal costs. Benefits included improvements to mental health and well-being, reduced use of services, increased social functioning and development of skills. Total number of personal costs experienced was significantly negatively related to peer supporters’ empowerment and quality of life. There were no significant differences between the groups examined. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: An accumulation of personal costs may result in reduced quality of life; however, costs can be minimised by organisations. Limitations of the research are discussed and recommendations for future research are made including the need for longitudinal research.

Suggested Citation

  • Eilish M Burke & Melissa Pyle & Karen Machin & Anthony P Morrison, 2018. "Providing mental health peer support 2: Relationships with empowerment, hope, recovery, quality of life and internalised stigma," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(8), pages 745-755, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:64:y:2018:i:8:p:745-755
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764018810307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764018810307
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764018810307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Priebe & P. Huxley & S. Knight & S. Evans, 1999. "Application and Results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (Mansa)," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 45(1), pages 7-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helen Killaspy & Sarah White & Nabeela Lalvani & Rachel Berg & Ajoy Thachil & Sen Kallumpuram & Omar Nasiruddin & Christine Wright & Gill Mezey, 2014. "The impact of psychosis on social inclusion and associated factors," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(2), pages 148-154, March.
    2. Mariana Pinto da Costa & Agnes Chevalier & Aida Farreny & Megan Cassidy & Monica Leverton & Sarah Toner & Stefan Priebe, 2019. "How would patients with psychosis like to be in contact with a volunteer: Face-to-face or digitally?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Gillian Mezey & Sarah White & Isobel Harrison & Jennifer Bousfield & Helen Killaspy & Brynmor Lloyd-Evans & Sarah Payne, 2022. "‘Modelling social exclusion in a diagnostically-mixed sample of people with severe mental illness’," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(2), pages 420-428, March.
    4. Domenico Giacco & Aleksandra Matanov & Stefan Priebe, 2013. "Symptoms and Subjective Quality of Life in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Longitudinal Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-7, April.
    5. Stefania Scuri & Marina Tesauro & Fabio Petrelli & Ninfa Argento & Genny Damasco & Giovanni Cangelosi & Cuc Thi Thu Nguyen & Demetris Savva & Iolanda Grappasonni, 2022. "Use of an Online Platform to Evaluate the Impact of Social Distancing Measures on Psycho-Physical Well-Being in the COVID-19 Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-10, June.
    6. Parvin Pooremamali & Mona Eklund, 2017. "Well-being and perceptions of everyday activities among those who attend community-based day centres for people with mental illness in Sweden – Does an immigrant background make a difference?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(6), pages 539-549, September.
    7. Mona Eklund & Lars Hansson, 2007. "Social Network Among People With Persistent Mental Illness: Associations With Sociodemographic, Clinical and Health-Related Factors," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 53(4), pages 293-305, July.
    8. Jitske F Koenders & Liselotte D de Mooij & Jack M Dekker & Martijn Kikkert, 2017. "Social inclusion and relationship satisfaction of patients with a severe mental illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(8), pages 773-781, December.
    9. Gelkopf, Marc & Pagorek-Eshel, Shira & Trauer, Tom & Roe, David, 2015. "Routine outcome measurement in mental health service consumers: Who should provide support for the self-assessments?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 43-46.
    10. A. Awad & Lakshmi Voruganti, 2012. "Measuring Quality of Life in Patients with Schizophrenia," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 183-195, March.
    11. S Evans & PJ Huxley & N Maxwell & KLS Huxley, 2014. "System-level change in mental health services in North Wales: An observational study using systems thinking," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(4), pages 337-351, June.
    12. Bárbara Pedrosa & Graça Cardoso & Sofia Azeredo-Lopes & Deborah Aluh & Ugnė Grigaitė & Margarida Dias & Manuela Silva & José Caldas de Almeida, 2023. "Experiences of care perceived by users of supported accommodations for people with serious mental disorders: Can they impact quality of life?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(3), pages 626-638, May.
    13. Gillian Mezey & Sarah White & Ajoy Thachil & Rachel Berg & Sen Kallumparam & Omar Nasiruddin & Christine Wright & Helen Killaspy, 2013. "Development and preliminary validation of a measure of social inclusion for use in people with mental health problems: The SInQUE," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(5), pages 501-507, August.
    14. Mona Eklund & Margareta Östman, 2010. "Belonging and Doing: Important Factors for Satisfaction With Sexual Relations as Perceived By People With Persistent Mental Illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 56(4), pages 336-347, July.
    15. Changwook Kim & Kyriaki Kaplanidou, 2019. "The Effect of Sport Involvement on Support for Mega Sport Events: Why Does It Matter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Francesco Altamore & Iolanda Grappasonni & Neelam Laxhman & Stefania Scuri & Fabio Petrelli & Giuliana Grifantini & Pamela Accaramboni & Stefan Priebe, 2020. "Psychological symptoms and quality of life after repeated exposure to earthquake: A cohort study in Italy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-6, May.
    17. Diana PK Roeg & Ien AM van de Goor & Margot CM Voogt & Marcel ALM van Assen & Henk FL Garretsen, 2014. "Effects of interferential care: A community-based care program for persons with severe problems on several life areas," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(6), pages 584-594, September.
    18. Mateusz Babicki & Bogna Bogudzińska & Krzysztof Kowalski & Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas, 2022. "Depression, Anxiety and Quality of Life among Online Responders in Poland: A Cross-Sectional Study Covering Four Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Charlotte Wendelboe-Nelson & Sarah Kelly & Marion Kennedy & John W. Cherrie, 2019. "A Scoping Review Mapping Research on Green Space and Associated Mental Health Benefits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-49, June.
    20. Michael P Hengartner & Silvia Passalacqua & Andreas Andreae & Wulf Rössler & Agnes von Wyl, 2017. "The role of perceived social support after psychiatric hospitalisation: Post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a transitional intervention," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(4), pages 297-306, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:64:y:2018:i:8:p:745-755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.