IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i4p21582440211048889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Properties and Structural Validity of the Serbian Version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBIser)

Author

Listed:
  • Marko Živanović
  • Emina Borjanić Bolić
  • MaÅ¡a VukÄ ević Marković

Abstract

Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) is a tool assessing fatigue and exhaustion as the core features of burnout. Despite its wide use and evidence of good psychometric properties, little is known about its structural validity. Therefore, this study aimed to examine internal psychometric properties and the latent composition of the Serbian version of CBI. A sample of 382 child welfare workers engaged in the work with the domestic population and professionals working with refugees and migrants completed a 19-item version of CBIser. Results showed that full-scale CBI despite having good psychometric properties lacks structural validity. A short-form of the instrument was empirically derived and several concurrent confirmatory models found in previous studies were tested. A three-factor model of personal , work- , and client-related burnout showed to be the best fitting one, and the 13-item form of CBI proved to be a structurally valid and psychometrically sound measure of burnout.

Suggested Citation

  • Marko Živanović & Emina Borjanić Bolić & MaÅ¡a VukÄ ević Marković, 2021. "Psychometric Properties and Structural Validity of the Serbian Version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBIser)," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211048889
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211048889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211048889
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211048889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taciano Milfont & Simon Denny & Shanthi Ameratunga & Elizabeth Robinson & Sally Merry, 2008. "Burnout and Wellbeing: Testing the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory in New Zealand Teachers," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 169-177, October.
    2. Yeh, Wan-Yu & Cheng, Yawen & Chen, Chiou-Jung, 2009. "Social patterns of pay systems and their associations with psychosocial job characteristics and burnout among paid employees in Taiwan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(8), pages 1407-1415, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ilija Coric & Katija Vojvodic, 2015. "Variable Pay: A Case Study In Warehouse Logistics," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 15, pages 189-200.
    2. Gyeong-Suk Jeon & Sun-Ju You & Myo-Gyeong Kim & Yoo-Mi Kim & Sung-Il Cho, 2019. "Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory in Korean homecare workers for older adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Gintarė Kalinienė & Dalia Lukšienė & Rūta Ustinavičienė & Lina Škėmienė & Vidmantas Januškevičius, 2021. "The Burnout Syndrome among Women Working in the Retail Network in Associations with Psychosocial Work Environment Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-11, May.
    4. Hsi-Sheng Wei & Ji-Kang Chen, 2010. "School Attachment Among Taiwanese Adolescents: The Roles of Individual Characteristics, Peer Relationships, and Teacher Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 421-436, February.
    5. Nora Suleiman-Martos & Luis Albendín-García & José L. Gómez-Urquiza & Keyla Vargas-Román & Lucia Ramirez-Baena & Elena Ortega-Campos & Emilia I. De La Fuente-Solana, 2020. "Prevalence and Predictors of Burnout in Midwives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Ilija Coric & Katija Vojvodic, 2018. "Variable Pay 2.0: Transforming The Post-Transitional Context In Warehouse Logistics," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 18, pages 109-123.
    7. Pavle Piperac & Jovana Todorovic & Zorica Terzic-Supic & Aleksandra Maksimovic & Svetlana Karic & Filip Pilipovic & Ivan Soldatovic, 2021. "The Validity and Reliability of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory for Examination of Burnout among Preschool Teachers in Serbia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-10, June.
    8. Anna Maria Mouza & Dimitra Souchamvali, 2016. "Effect of Greece’s New Reforms and Unplanned Organizational Changes on the Stress Levels of Primary School Teachers," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(3), pages 981-994, September.
    9. Aurora Adina COLOMEISCHI, 2017. "Teachers’ Life Satisfaction and Wellbeing: Engagement Influences," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Otilia Clipa (ed.), Studies and Current Trends in Science of Education, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 16, pages 139-150, Editura Lumen.
    10. Weiyi Zhang & Hiromasa Takahashi & Junyi Shen, 2016. "Does Physical Exercise Affect Tradeoffs between Fixed Pay and Performance-related Pay for Individuals?," Discussion Paper Series DP2016-13, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211048889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.