IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i2p21582440211016387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is There a Digital Divide Between Urban Students and Migrant Students in China?

Author

Listed:
  • Baichang Zhong
  • Fenghui Zhu
  • Liying Xia

Abstract

The digital divide is an important issue that has been addressed in the world for several decades. However, little attention has been paid to the special population that emerged in cities of developing countries: rural migrant workers. Previous studies have shown that family background is a potential determinant of digital inequality among schoolchildren. The study aims to explore whether the disadvantaged conditions of rural migrant workers have an impact on their children (i.e., migrant students). A questionnaire survey and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were conducted to examine the digital divide in information and communication technology (ICT) access, ICT usage, and ICT skill between urban and migrant students. We draw upon 1,230 fifth and eighth grade students from six urban public schools in China. Results indicate that all the indicators of the digital divide are statistically non-significant between the two groups, and the predictor of parental education level is invalid to an extent. Additional analyses suggest that providing equal opportunities like Chinese government for disadvantaged migrant students to enroll in urban public schools would reduce the digital divide between migrant students and urban students.

Suggested Citation

  • Baichang Zhong & Fenghui Zhu & Liying Xia, 2021. "Is There a Digital Divide Between Urban Students and Migrant Students in China?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:21582440211016387
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211016387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211016387
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211016387?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pérez-Amaral, Teodosio & Valarezo, Angel & López, Rafael & Garín-Muñoz, Teresa, 2021. "Digital divides across consumers of internet services in Spain using panel data 2007–2019. Narrowing or not?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2).
    2. Yihua Yang & Xiao Hu & Qinghe Qu & Fang Lai & Yaojiang Shi & Matthew Boswell & Scott Rozelle, 2013. "Roots of Tomorrow's Digital Divide: Documenting Computer Use and Internet Access in China's Elementary Schools Today," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 21(3), pages 61-79, May.
    3. Hilbert, Martin, 2016. "The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–2014," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 567-581.
    4. Paul DiMaggio & Eszter Hargittai, 2001. "From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases," Working Papers 47, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. López, Rafael & Valarezo, Ángel & Pérez-Amaral, Teodosio, 2023. "Unleashing the potential of online learning in Spain: An econometric analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6).
    2. Liu, Chun & Wang, Lian, 2021. "Who is left behind? Exploring the characteristics of China's broadband non-adopting families," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9).
    3. Haile Teklemariam, Mekuria & Kwon, Youngsun, 2018. "Reducing internet demand-side gap improves digital inclusion in low-income countries: - analysis that is more comprehensive," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190411, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. Fisher, Matthew & Freeman, Toby & Schram, Ashley & Baum, Fran & Friel, Sharon, 2020. "Implementing policy on next-generation broadband networks and implications for equity of access to high speed broadband: A case study of Australia's NBN," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7).
    5. Zhouying Song & Tao Song & Yu Yang & Zhenbo Wang, 2019. "Spatial–Temporal Characteristics and Determinants of Digital Divide in China: A Multivariate Spatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Uduak Okon, 2015. "ICT for Rural Community Development: Implementing the Communicative Ecology Framework in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 297-321, April.
    7. Javier Barbero & Ernesto Rodríguez-Crespo, 2022. "Technological, institutional, and geographical peripheries: regional development and risk of poverty in the European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(2), pages 311-332, October.
    8. Bulman, George & Fairlie, Robert W, 2015. "Technology and Education: Computers, Software, and the Internet," Santa Cruz Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt5265z87t, Department of Economics, UC Santa Cruz.
    9. Grishchenko, Natalia, 2020. "The gap not only closes: Resistance and reverse shifts in the digital divide in Russia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8).
    10. Lüdering, Jochen, 2014. "The measurement of internet availability and quality in the context of the discussion on digital divide," Discussion Papers 65, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Center for international Development and Environmental Research (ZEU).
    11. Zhouying Song, 2022. "The geography of online shopping in China and its key drivers," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(1), pages 259-274, January.
    12. Robert W. Fairlie & Rebecca A. London, 2012. "The Effects of Home Computers on Educational Outcomes: Evidence from a Field Experiment with Community College Students," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 122(561), pages 727-753, June.
    13. Robert Fairlie & Jonathan Robinson, 2011. "The Effects of Home Computers on Educational Outcomes. Evidence from a Field Experiment with Schoolchildren," Working Papers 11-14, NET Institute, revised Sep 2011.
    14. Vitor Miguel Ribeiro & Lei Bao, 2021. "Impact of next‐generation access networks on the innovation efficiency of Portuguese municipalities: A spatial econometrics approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 1615-1637, October.
    15. Michele POSTIGLIOLA, 2016. "Donatella Strangio & Giuseppe Sancetta (Eds.), Italy in a European Context: Research in Business, Economics, and the Environment," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 201-204, March.
    16. Holden , Stein T. & Tilahun , Mesfin, 2018. "Gender Digital Divide and Youth Business Group Leadership," CLTS Working Papers 5/18, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies, revised 16 Oct 2019.
    17. Jiafeng Gu, 2021. "Family Conditions and the Accessibility of Online Education: The Digital Divide and Mediating Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Holden, Stein T. & Tilahun, Mesfin, 2021. "Mobile phones, leadership and gender in rural business groups," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    19. Sara Ayllón & Halla Holmarsdottir & Samuel Lado, 2023. "Digitally Deprived Children in Europe," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 16(3), pages 1315-1339, June.
    20. Marios A. Pappas & Eleftheria Demertzi & Yannis Papagerasimou & Lefteris Koukianakis & Nikitas Voukelatos & Athanasios Drigas, 2019. "Cognitive-Based E-Learning Design for Older Adults," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:2:p:21582440211016387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.