IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v37y2017i8p922-929.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taking Costs and Diagnostic Test Accuracy into Account When Designing Prevalence Studies: An Application to Childhood Tuberculosis Prevalence

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuoyu Wang
  • Nandini Dendukuri
  • Madhukar Pai
  • Lawrence Joseph

Abstract

Background. When planning a study to estimate disease prevalence to a pre-specified precision, it is of interest to minimize total testing cost. This is particularly challenging in the absence of a perfect reference test for the disease because different combinations of imperfect tests need to be considered. We illustrate the problem and a solution by designing a study to estimate the prevalence of childhood tuberculosis in a hospital setting. Methods. All possible combinations of 3 commonly used tuberculosis tests, including chest X-ray, tuberculin skin test, and a sputum-based test, either culture or Xpert, are considered. For each of the 11 possible test combinations, 3 Bayesian sample size criteria, including average coverage criterion, average length criterion and modified worst outcome criterion, are used to determine the required sample size and total testing cost, taking into consideration prior knowledge about the accuracy of the tests. Results. In some cases, the required sample sizes and total testing costs were both reduced when more tests were used, whereas, in other examples, lower costs are achieved with fewer tests. Conclusion. Total testing cost should be formally considered when designing a prevalence study.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuoyu Wang & Nandini Dendukuri & Madhukar Pai & Lawrence Joseph, 2017. "Taking Costs and Diagnostic Test Accuracy into Account When Designing Prevalence Studies: An Application to Childhood Tuberculosis Prevalence," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 37(8), pages 922-929, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:37:y:2017:i:8:p:922-929
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17713456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X17713456
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X17713456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nandini Dendukuri & Elham Rahme & Patrick Bélisle & Lawrence Joseph, 2004. "Bayesian Sample Size Determination for Prevalence and Diagnostic Test Studies in the Absence of a Gold Standard Test," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 388-397, June.
    2. Lucy Cunnama & Edina Sinanovic & Lebogang Ramma & Nicola Foster & Leigh Berrie & Wendy Stevens & Sebaka Molapo & Puleng Marokane & Kerrigan McCarthy & Gavin Churchyard & Anna Vassall, 2016. "Using Top‐down and Bottom‐up Costing Approaches in LMICs: The Case for Using Both to Assess the Incremental Costs of New Technologies at Scale," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(S1), pages 53-66, February.
    3. Lucy Cunnama & Edina Sinanovic & Lebogang Ramma & Nicola Foster & Leigh Berrie & Wendy Stevens & Sebaka Molapo & Puleng Marokane & Kerrigan McCarthy & Gavin Churchyard & Anna Vassall, 2016. "Using Top‐down and Bottom‐up Costing Approaches in LMICs: The Case for Using Both to Assess the Incremental Costs of New Technologies at Scale," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25, pages 53-66, February.
    4. E. Rahme & L. Joseph & T. W. Gyorkos, 2000. "Bayesian sample size determination for estimating binomial parameters from data subject to misclassification," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 49(1), pages 119-128.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sander Greenland, 2005. "Multiple‐bias modelling for analysis of observational data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 168(2), pages 267-306, March.
    2. Sayem Ahmed & Md Zahid Hasan & Nausad Ali & Mohammad Wahid Ahmed & Emranul Haq & Sadia Shabnam & Morseda Chowdhury & Breda Gahan & Christine Bousquet & Jahangir A M Khan & Ziaul Islam, 2021. "Effectiveness of health voucher scheme and micro-health insurance scheme to support the poor and extreme poor in selected urban areas of Bangladesh: An assessment using a mixed-method approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-31, November.
    3. Nicola Foster & Lucy Cunnama & Kerrigan McCarthy & Lebogang Ramma & Mariana Siapka & Edina Sinanovic & Gavin Churchyard & Katherine Fielding & Alison D Grant & Susan Cleary, 2021. "Strengthening health systems to improve the value of tuberculosis diagnostics in South Africa: A cost and cost-effectiveness analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Catherine Pitt & Catherine Goodman & Kara Hanson, 2016. "Economic Evaluation in Global Perspective: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Recent Literature," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(S1), pages 9-28, February.
    5. Joanna Jędrzejczak & Beata Majkowska-Zwolińska & Anna Chudzicka-Bator & Iwona Żerda & Magdalena Władysiuk & Brian Godman, 2021. "Economic and social cost of epilepsy in Poland: 5-year analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(3), pages 485-497, April.
    6. Paul Gustafson, 2006. "Sample size implications when biases are modelled rather than ignored," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(4), pages 865-881, October.
    7. Lelisa Fekadu Assebe & Wondesen Nigatu Belete & Senait Alemayehu & Elias Asfaw & Kora Tushune Godana & Yibeltal Kiflie Alemayehu & Alula M Teklu & Amanuel Yigezu, 2021. "Economic evaluation of Health Extension Program packages in Ethiopia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Stamey, James & Gerlach, Richard, 2007. "Bayesian sample size determination for case-control studies with misclassification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 2982-2992, March.
    9. Catherine Pitt & Anna Vassall & Yot Teerawattananon & Ulla K. Griffiths & Lorna Guinness & Damian Walker & Nicola Foster & Kara Hanson, 2016. "Foreword: Health Economic Evaluations in Low‐ and Middle‐income Countries: Methodological Issues and Challenges for Priority Setting," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(S1), pages 1-5, February.
    10. Martijn van Hasselt & Christopher R. Bollinger & Jeremy W. Bray, 2022. "A Bayesian approach to account for misclassification in prevalence and trend estimation," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 351-367, March.
    11. Boris G. Zaslavsky, 2013. "Bayesian Hypothesis Testing in Two-Arm Trials with Dichotomous Outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 157-163, March.
    12. Paul Gustafson & Nhu D. Le & Refik Saskin, 2001. "Case–Control Analysis with Partial Knowledge of Exposure Misclassification Probabilities," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 598-609, June.
    13. Bart Jacobs & Kelvin Hui & Veasnakiry Lo & Michael Thiede & Bernd Appelt & Steffen Flessa, 2019. "Costing for universal health coverage: insight into essential economic data from three provinces in Cambodia," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Geoffrey Jones & Wesley O. Johnson & Timothy E. Hanson & Ronald Christensen, 2010. "Identifiability of Models for Multiple Diagnostic Testing in the Absence of a Gold Standard," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 855-863, September.
    15. Chinyereugo M Umemneku Chikere & Kevin Wilson & Sara Graziadio & Luke Vale & A Joy Allen, 2019. "Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, October.
    16. M. Rosário Oliveira & Ana Subtil & Luzia Gonçalves, 2020. "Common Medical and Statistical Problems: The Dilemma of the Sample Size Calculation for Sensitivity and Specificity Estimation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-17, August.
    17. Beavers, Daniel P. & Stamey, James D., 2012. "Bayesian sample size determination for binary regression with a misclassified covariate and no gold standard," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(8), pages 2574-2582.
    18. Wesley O. Johnson & Chun-Lung Su & Ian A. Gardner & Ronald Christensen, 2004. "Sample Size Calculations for Surveys to Substantiate Freedom of Populations from Infectious Agents," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 165-171, March.
    19. Stamey, James D. & Boese, Doyle H. & Young, Dean M., 2008. "Confidence intervals for parameters of two diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1335-1346, January.
    20. Paul Gustafson & Sander Greenland, 2006. "The Performance of Random Coefficient Regression in Accounting for Residual Confounding," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 760-768, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:37:y:2017:i:8:p:922-929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.