IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v35y2015i1p46-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy of a Web-Based Intelligent Tutoring System for Communicating Genetic Risk of Breast Cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher R. Wolfe
  • Valerie F. Reyna
  • Colin L. Widmer
  • Elizabeth M. Cedillos
  • Christopher R. Fisher
  • Priscila G. Brust-Renck
  • Audrey M. Weil

Abstract

Background . Many healthy women consider genetic testing for breast cancer risk, yet BRCA testing issues are complex. Objective . To determine whether an intelligent tutor, BRCA Gist, grounded in fuzzy-trace theory (FTT), increases gist comprehension and knowledge about genetic testing for breast cancer risk, improving decision making. Design . In 2 experiments, 410 healthy undergraduate women were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: an online module using a Web-based tutoring system (BRCA Gist) that uses artificial intelligence technology, a second group read highly similar content from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Web site, and a third that completed an unrelated tutorial. Intervention . BRCA Gist applied FTT and was designed to help participants develop gist comprehension of topics relevant to decisions about BRCA genetic testing, including how breast cancer spreads, inherited genetic mutations, and base rates. Measures . We measured content knowledge, gist comprehension of decision-relevant information, interest in testing, and genetic risk and testing judgments. Results . Control knowledge scores ranged from 54% to 56%, NCI improved significantly to 65% and 70%, and BRCA Gist improved significantly more to 75% and 77%, P

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher R. Wolfe & Valerie F. Reyna & Colin L. Widmer & Elizabeth M. Cedillos & Christopher R. Fisher & Priscila G. Brust-Renck & Audrey M. Weil, 2015. "Efficacy of a Web-Based Intelligent Tutoring System for Communicating Genetic Risk of Breast Cancer," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(1), pages 46-59, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:35:y:2015:i:1:p:46-59
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X14535983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X14535983
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X14535983?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gram, I.T. & Slenker, S.E., 1992. "Cancer anxiety and attitudes toward mammography among screening attenders, nonattenders, and women never invited," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 82(2), pages 249-251.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reeson, Andrew & Mason, Claire & Sanderson, Todd & Bratanova, Alexandra & Hajkowicz, Stefan, 2016. "The VET era: equipping Australia’s workforce for the future digital economy," MPRA Paper 114022, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Martin Michalowski & Szymon Wilk & Wojtek Michalowski & Dympna O’Sullivan & Silvia Bonaccio & Enea Parimbelli & Marc Carrier & Grégoire Le Gal & Stephen Kingwell & Mor Peleg, 2021. "A Health eLearning Ontology and Procedural Reasoning Approach for Developing Personalized Courses to Teach Patients about Their Medical Condition and Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-28, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Craig W. Trumbo & Katherine A. McComas & John C. Besley, 2008. "Individual‐ and Community‐Level Effects on Risk Perception in Cancer Cluster Investigations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 161-178, February.
    2. Mark Pletscher, 2017. "The effects of organized screening programs on the demand for mammography in Switzerland," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(5), pages 649-665, June.
    3. Craig W. Trumbo & Katherine A. McComas & Prathana Kannaovakun, 2007. "Cancer Anxiety and the Perception of Risk in Alarmed Communities," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 337-350, April.
    4. Barbara E. Kahn & Mary Frances Luce, 2003. "Understanding High-Stakes Consumer Decisions: Mammography Adherence Following False-Alarm Test Results," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 393-410, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:35:y:2015:i:1:p:46-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.