IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v29y2014i6-7p635-656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban regeneration companies and their institutional setting: Prevailing instabilities within the West Midlands, England

Author

Listed:
  • Steven R Henderson

Abstract

Urban regeneration companies were adopted by the UK government during the 2000s as a property-orientated economic development initiative. Compared to earlier urban development corporations, urban regeneration companies lacked dedicated funding and depended upon the planning and regeneration capabilities of partner agencies. Evaluative perspectives on urban regeneration companies have often been favourable, though the depth and breadth of analysis has been limited, particularly beyond three core city pilots. Outstanding institutionalist questions remain about the diverse settings within which urban regeneration companies operated and their relationship with local authorities. Drawing on interviews this paper investigates the reasons for and operation of three West Midlands-based urban regeneration companies, all within the de-industrialising Black Country sub-region. Rather than early support for government steering towards partnership working, attention is drawn to evidence of pragmatism, resistance and compromise. The potential for local institutional dynamics to influence the stability of regeneration initiatives is then acknowledged as illustrated by officer level tensions associated with existing projects, experiential learning and ground level outcomes. Compared to prevailing urban regeneration company perspectives, the Black Country urban regeneration companies lost momentum prior to national austerity. Future questions remain about appropriate forms of regeneration within smaller settlements with problematic industrial legacies and the capacity of local authorities to advance collaborative forms of regeneration.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven R Henderson, 2014. "Urban regeneration companies and their institutional setting: Prevailing instabilities within the West Midlands, England," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(6-7), pages 635-656, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:29:y:2014:i:6-7:p:635-656
    DOI: 10.1177/0269094214550271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269094214550271
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0269094214550271?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diane Perrons & Sophia Skyers, 2003. "Empowerment Through Participation? Conceptual Explorations and A Case Study," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 265-285, June.
    2. Mike Raco & Ivan Turok & Keith Kintrea, 2003. "Local Development Companies and the Regeneration of Britain's Cities," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 21(2), pages 277-303, April.
    3. repec:taf:regstd:v:46:y:2010:i:9:p:1243-1259 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alex Fenton & Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2013. "Labour’s Record on Neighbourhood Renewal in England: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997-2010," CASE Papers case177, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    2. repec:cep:sticas:/177 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Gillian Bristow & Tom Entwistle & Frances Hines & Steve Martin, 2008. "New Spaces for Inclusion? Lessons from the ‘Three‐Thirds’ Partnerships in Wales," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 903-921, December.
    4. Alistair Rainnie, 2021. "Regional development and agency: Unfinished business," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(1), pages 42-55, February.
    5. Alex Fenton & Amanda Fitzgerald & Ruth Lupton, 2013. "Labour's Record on Neighbourhood Renewal in England: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997-2010," CASE - Social Policy in a Cold Climate Working Paper 06, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    6. Angela Hull, 2006. "Facilitating Structures for Neighbourhood Regeneration in the UK: The Contribution of the Housing Action Trusts," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(12), pages 2317-2350, November.
    7. Jonathan S. Davies, 2007. "The Limits of Partnership: An Exit‐Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(4), pages 779-800, December.
    8. Andreas Novy & Daniela Coimbra Swiatek & Frank Moulaert, 2012. "Social Cohesion: A Conceptual and Political Elucidation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1873-1889, July.
    9. Ruth Lupton & Crispian Fuller, 2009. "Mixed Communities: A New Approach to Spatially Concentrated Poverty in England," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1014-1028, December.
    10. Venda Louise Pollock & Joanne Sharp, 2012. "Real Participation or the Tyranny of Participatory Practice? Public Art and Community Involvement in the Regeneration of the Raploch, Scotland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(14), pages 3063-3079, November.
    11. Keiron Bailey & Benjamin Blandford & Ted Grossardt & John Ripy, 2011. "Planning, Technology, and Legitimacy: Structured Public Involvement in Integrated Transportation and Land-Use Planning in the United States," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 38(3), pages 447-467, June.
    12. Théodore METAXAS & Marie-Noëlle DUQUENNE, 2017. "Partnerships and development policies for small-medium enterprises in Greece: a CFA approach," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 45, pages 131-158.
    13. Lupton, Ruth & Fenton, Alex & Fitzgerald, Amanda, 2013. "Labour's record on neighbourhood renewal in England: policy, spending and outcomes 1997-2010," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 58086, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Lupton, Ruth & Fuller, Crispian, 2009. "Mixed communities: a new approach to spatially concentrated poverty in England," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27086, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Heike Doering, 2014. "Competing Visions of Community: Empowerment and Abandonment in the Governance of Coalfield Regeneration," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1003-1018, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:29:y:2014:i:6-7:p:635-656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.