IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v35y2010i4p379-406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Late Pretest Problem in Randomized Control Trials of Education Interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Z. Schochet

Abstract

Pretest–posttest experimental designs often are used in randomized control trials (RCTs) in the education field to improve the precision of the estimated treatment effects. For logistic reasons, however, pretest data often are collected after random assignment, so that including them in the analysis could bias the posttest impact estimates. Thus, the issue of whether to collect and use late pretest data in RCTs involves a variance-bias trade-off. This article addresses this issue both theoretically and empirically for several commonly used impact estimators using a loss function approach that is grounded in the causal inference literature. The key finding is that for RCTs of interventions that aim to improve student test scores, estimators that include late pretests will typically be preferred to estimators that exclude them or that instead include uncontaminated baseline test score data from other sources. This result holds as long as the growth in test score impacts do not grow very quickly early in the school year.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Z. Schochet, 2010. "The Late Pretest Problem in Randomized Control Trials of Education Interventions," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(4), pages 379-406, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:35:y:2010:i:4:p:379-406
    DOI: 10.3102/1076998609353112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/1076998609353112
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/1076998609353112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang L. & Tsiatis A. A., 2001. "Efficiency Study of Estimators for a Treatment Effect in a Pretest-Posttest Trial," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 55, pages 314-321, November.
    2. Paul T. Decker & Daniel P. Mayer & Steven Glazerman, "undated". "The Effects of Teach For America on Students: Findings from a National Evaluation," Mathematica Policy Research Reports c8b5eb6d499c465c86a96bee4, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. repec:mpr:mprres:3181 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Daniel P. Mayer & Paul E. Peterson & David E. Myers & Christina Clark Tuttle & William G. Howell, 2002. "School Choice in New York City After Three Years: An Evaluation of the School Choice Scholarships Program," Mathematica Policy Research Reports bd29adb569094778a5981be0e, Mathematica Policy Research.
    5. Peter Z. Schochet, "undated". "Statistical Power for Random Assignment Evaluations of Education Programs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 6749d31ad72d4acf988f7dce5, Mathematica Policy Research.
    6. repec:mpr:mprres:3628 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:mpr:mprres:3180 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:mpr:mprres:5863 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:mpr:mprres:5468 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Peter Z. Schochet, "undated". "Is Regression Adjustment Supported by the Neyman Model for Causal Inference? (Presentation)," Mathematica Policy Research Reports abfc39d59c714499b2fe42f68, Mathematica Policy Research.
    11. Peter Z. Schochet, "undated". "Is Regression Adjustment Supported By the Neyman Model for Causal Inference?," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 782da2242fba458eb61752f96, Mathematica Policy Research.
    12. repec:mpr:mprres:4150 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. repec:mpr:mprres:4012 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Roberto Agodini & Mark Dynarski & Margaret Honey & Douglas Levin, 2003. "The Effectiveness of Educational Technology: Issues and Recommendations for the National Study," Mathematica Policy Research Reports bfacb38f8ef74f6db7bba181e, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Z. Schochet, 2020. "Analyzing Grouped Administrative Data for RCTs Using Design-Based Methods," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(1), pages 32-57, February.
    2. Peter Z. Schochet, "undated". "The Late Pretest Problem in Randomized Control Trials of Education Interventions," Mathematica Policy Research Reports fb514df5dbb84a5dbea79865c, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. Peter Z. Schochet, "undated". "Statistical Theory for the RCT-YES Software: Design-Based Causal Inference for RCTs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports a0c005c003c242308a92c02dc, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. repec:mpr:mprres:6286 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:mpr:mprres:6094 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Peter Z. Schochet & Hanley Chiang, "undated". "Technical Methods Report: Estimation and Identification of the Complier Average Causal Effect Parameter in Education RCTs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 947d1823e3ff42208532a763d, Mathematica Policy Research.
    7. Peter Z. Schochet, "undated". "Technical Methods Report: Statistical Power for Regression Discontinuity Designs in Education Evaluations," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 61fb6c057561451a8a6074508, Mathematica Policy Research.
    8. Peter Z. Schochet, 2013. "Estimators for Clustered Education RCTs Using the Neyman Model for Causal Inference," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 38(3), pages 219-238, June.
    9. repec:mpr:mprres:6372 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Kenneth Fortson & Natalya Verbitsky-Savitz & Emma Kopa & Philip Gleason, 2012. "Using an Experimental Evaluation of Charter Schools to Test Whether Nonexperimental Comparison Group Methods Can Replicate Experimental Impact Estimates," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 27f871b5b7b94f3a80278a593, Mathematica Policy Research.
    11. Peter Z. Schochet, 2018. "Design-Based Estimators for Average Treatment Effects for Multi-Armed RCTs," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(5), pages 568-593, October.
    12. John Deke, 2016. "Design and Analysis Considerations for Cluster Randomized Controlled Trials That Have a Small Number of Clusters," Evaluation Review, , vol. 40(5), pages 444-486, October.
    13. repec:mpr:mprres:7443 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. repec:mpr:mprres:8128 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Peter Z. Schochet, 2021. "Statistical Power for Estimating Treatment Effects Using Difference-in-Differences and Comparative Interrupted Time Series Designs with Variation in Treatment Timing," Papers 2102.06770, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    16. Tim Kautz & Peter Z. Schochet & Charles Tilley, "undated". "Comparing Impact Findings from Design-Based and Model-Based Methods: An Empirical Investigation," Mathematica Policy Research Reports b7656ddce20f4007b71836e99, Mathematica Policy Research.
    17. repec:mpr:mprres:7638 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. repec:mpr:mprres:6965 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. repec:mpr:mprres:7273 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Lu, Jiannan, 2016. "On randomization-based and regression-based inferences for 2K factorial designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 72-78.
    21. Peter Z. Schochet, "undated". "Statistical Power for Random Assignment Evaluations of Education Programs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 6749d31ad72d4acf988f7dce5, Mathematica Policy Research.
    22. Peter Z. Schochet, "undated". "Is Regression Adjustment Supported by the Neyman Model for Causal Inference? (Presentation)," Mathematica Policy Research Reports abfc39d59c714499b2fe42f68, Mathematica Policy Research.
    23. Joel A. Middleton, 2021. "Unifying Design-based Inference: On Bounding and Estimating the Variance of any Linear Estimator in any Experimental Design," Papers 2109.09220, arXiv.org.
    24. Melissa A. Clark & Philip Gleason & Christina Clark Tuttle & Marsha K. Silverberg, 2011. "Do Charter Schools Improve Student Achievement? Evidence from a National Randomized Study," Mathematica Policy Research Reports af41392138504f369930e6f2b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    25. repec:mpr:mprres:5699 is not listed on IDEAS
    26. Laura Blue & Gregory Peterson & Keith Kranker & Tessa Huffman & Alli Steiner & Amanda Markovitz & Malcolm Williams & Kate Stewart & Julia Rollison & Jia Pu & Thomas Concannon & Liisa Hiatt & Nabeel Qu, "undated". "Evaluation of the Million Hearts® Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction Model: Third Annual Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports d4649f0778804c4eb0adcf2db, Mathematica Policy Research.
    27. Susan Athey & Guido Imbens, 2016. "The Econometrics of Randomized Experiments," Papers 1607.00698, arXiv.org.
    28. Thomas Fraker & Peter Baird & Alison Black & Arif Mamun & Michelle Manno & John Martinez & Anu Rangarajan & Debbie Reed, "undated". "The Social Security Administration's Youth Transition Demonstration Projects: Interim Report on Colorado Youth WINS," Mathematica Policy Research Reports f57994086f8a436ca69e24800, Mathematica Policy Research.
    29. Alberto Abadie & Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2014. "Finite Population Causal Standard Errors," NBER Working Papers 20325, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:35:y:2010:i:4:p:379-406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.