IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inrsre/v42y2019i5-6p374-399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolving Regional Analytics in a Rural World

Author

Listed:
  • Alan T. Murray
  • Tony H. Grubesic

Abstract

Regions are important and invariably constitute largely rural areas. This being the case, it is interesting to find that the condition of being rural fluctuates significantly, especially in the United States, and is largely contingent upon federal definitions that consider population and proximity to metropolitan areas for delineating the geographic boundaries of a rural place. Variations in definitions, both nuanced and more substantial, make classification mutable for many communities but underlies the challenge for evaluating, understanding, and improving rural conditions. This is particularly true when conducting exploratory and confirmatory analysis based on indicators and methods that identify/monitor troubled rural areas as well as support assessment of aid programs and/or public policy. The purpose of this article is to review alternative definitions of rural within the context of interpretation that relies on indicators. This highlights a number of issues, as conditions of rural polymorphism make scientific assessment challenging in many ways. Empirical evidence of indicator impacts is offered through a study of the medically uninsured in the state of Kentucky, highlighting how this can alter planning and policy interpretation.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan T. Murray & Tony H. Grubesic, 2019. "Evolving Regional Analytics in a Rural World," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 42(5-6), pages 374-399, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:42:y:2019:i:5-6:p:374-399
    DOI: 10.1177/0160017619827071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0160017619827071
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0160017619827071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Yuanyuan & Liu, Yansui & Li, Yurui & Li, Jintao, 2018. "Measure of urban-rural transformation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in the new millennium: Population-land-industry perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 595-608.
    2. Waldorf, Brigitte S., 2006. "A Continuous Multi-dimensional Measure of Rurality: Moving Beyond Threshold Measures," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21383, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Alan T. Murray & Tony H. Grubesic, 2012. "Spatial Optimization and Geographic Uncertainty: Implications for Sex Offender Management Strategies," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Michael P. Johnson (ed.), Community-Based Operations Research, chapter 0, pages 121-142, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luo, Tao & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Huang, Ruyi & Chen, Qiu & Mei, Zili & Pan, Junting & Liu, Hongbin, 2020. "Analysis of revolution in decentralized biogas facilities caused by transition in Chinese rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Wang, Bo & Li, Fan & Feng, Shuyi & Shen, Tong, 2020. "Transfer of development rights, farmland preservation, and economic growth: a case study of Chongqing’s land quotas trading program," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Qingqing Yang & Yanhui Gao & Xinjun Yang & Jian Zhang, 2022. "Rural Transformation Driven by Households’ Adaptation to Climate, Policy, Market, and Urbanization: Perspectives from Livelihoods–Land Use on Chinese Loess Plateau," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Alan T. Murray & Ran Wei & Richard L. Church & Matthew R. Niblett, 2019. "Addressing risks and uncertainty in forest land use modeling," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 319-338, September.
    5. Tong Wang & David A. Hennessy & Annette M. O'Connor, 2010. "Where Are the Veterinarian Shortage Areas Anyway?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 10-wp513, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    6. Viñas Carmen Delgado, 2019. "Depopulation Processes in European Rural Areas: A Case Study of Cantabria (Spain)," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(3), pages 341-369, September.
    7. Wang, Cheng & Wang, Gang & Guo, Ziru & Dai, Lingjun & Liu, Hongyu & Li, Yufeng & Chen, Hao & Zhao, Yongxiang & Zhang, Yanan & Cheng, Hai, 2020. "Effects of land-use change on the distribution of the wintering red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis) in the coastal area of northern Jiangsu Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. Kimhi, Ayal & Sarit Menahem-Carmi, 2017. "Does rural household income depend on neighboring urban centers?Evidence from Israel," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 13(1), pages 26-35, JUNE.
    9. Zhang Zhang & Huimin Zhou & Shuxian Li & Zhibin Zhao & Junbo Xu & Yuansuo Zhang, 2024. "Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Land Use Efficiency in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-27, April.
    10. Qianqian Huang & Benhong Peng & Xin Sheng & Anxia Wan, 2022. "Exploring new ideas for sustainable development of urban agglomerations-based on the coupling of people’s livelihood and environmental governance," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 9985-10004, August.
    11. Waldorf, Brigitte S., 2007. "The Effects Of Rurality And Industrial Specialization Income Growth: U.S. Counties 2000 To 2003," Working papers 7334, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    12. Yue, Wenze & Wang, Tianyu & Liu, Yong & Zhang, Qun & Ye, Xinyue, 2019. "Mismatch of morphological and functional polycentricity in Chinese cities: An evidence from land development and functional linkage," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Beghin, John C. & Meade, Birgit Gisela Saager & Rosen, Stacey, 2014. "A Consistent Food Demand Framework for International Food Security Assessment," 2014: Food, Resources and Conflict, December 7-9, 2014. San Diego, California 197167, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    14. Bo Tan & Hongwei Wang & Chen Ma & Xiaoqin Wang & Jing Zhou, 2021. "Spatial and Temporal Measurement of the Interaction between the County Economy and Rural Transformation in Xinjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Thomas F. P. Wiesen & Todd Gabe & Lakshya Bharadwaj, 2023. "Econometric connectedness as a measure of urban influence: evidence from Maine," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Huxiao Zhu & Xiangjun Ou & Zhen Yang & Yiwen Yang & Hongxin Ren & Le Tang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Forces of Land Urbanization in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Yuzhu Zang & Junjun Zhu & Xu Han & Ligang Lv, 2023. "Dynamics between Population Growth and Construction Land Expansion: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, June.
    18. Shu-Yi Chi & Tsorng-Chyi Hwang & Li-Hsien Chien, 2023. "Business Policy and Competitiveness of Farmers’ Organizations—Empirical Evidence from Taiwan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Ma, Wenqiu & Jiang, Guanghui & Chen, Yunhao & Qu, Yanbo & Zhou, Tao & Li, Wenqing, 2020. "How feasible is regional integration for reconciling land use conflicts across the urban–rural interface? Evidence from Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei metropolitan region in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Chen, Zhu & Zhang, Anlu & Zhou, Kehao & Huang, Lingxiang, 2021. "Can payment tools substitute for regulatory ones? Estimating the policy preference for agricultural land preservation, Tianjin, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:42:y:2019:i:5-6:p:374-399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.