IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/fortra/v50y2015i1p31-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Revised GATT/WTO Special and Differential Treatment Regime for Least Developed and Developing Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Omphemetse S. Sibanda Sr.

Abstract

The envisaged benefits of the special and differential treatment (S&DT) is that developed countries will provide a supportive environment to least-developed countries (LDCs) through amongst others: providing preferential access to their markets; providing technical and other assistance which would permit them to meet their WTO obligations; developed countries implementing WTO associated agreements subject to conscious and positive consideration of interests of LDCs; LDCs given the privilege of more time to meet their obligations under WTO agreements. However, the asymmetry that exists as regards developed countries and LDCs in terms of the levels of development reveals some inefficiencies of the application of S&DT regime. The current S&DT system needs be revised.

Suggested Citation

  • Omphemetse S. Sibanda Sr., 2015. "Towards a Revised GATT/WTO Special and Differential Treatment Regime for Least Developed and Developing Countries," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 50(1), pages 31-40, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:fortra:v:50:y:2015:i:1:p:31-40
    DOI: 10.1177/0015732514558140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0015732514558140
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0015732514558140?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christie, Andrew, 2009. "Special and Differential Treatment in the GATT: A Pyrrhic Victory for Developing Countries: Technical Annex," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 10(2), pages 1-4.
    2. Keck, Alexander & Low, Patrick, 2004. "Special and differential treatment in the WTO: Why, when and how?," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2004-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    3. John Whalley, 1999. "Special and Differential Treatment in the Millennium Round," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(8), pages 1065-1093, November.
    4. Christie, Andrew, 2009. "Special and Differential Treatment in the GATT: A Pyrrhic Victory for Developing Countries," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22.
    5. Mitchell, Andrew D., 2006. "A legal principle of special and differential treatment for WTO disputes," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 445-469, November.
    6. Michalopoulos, Constantine, 2000. "The role of special differential treatment for developing countries in GATT and the World Trade Organization," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2388, The World Bank.
    7. Kerr, William A., 2005. "Special and Differential Treatment: A Mechanism to Promote Development?," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11.
    8. Kerr, William A., 2012. "Strategic Devaluation, Trade and Political Convenience," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehdi Abbas, 2007. "Mondialisation, Organisation mondiale du commerce et rapports Nord-Sud : entre différenciation et espace politique pour le développement," Post-Print halshs-00263950, HAL.
    2. Ana Luiza Cortez & Mehmet Arda, 2014. "Global trade rules for supporting development in the post-2015 era," CDP Background Papers 019, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    3. Holmes, Peter & Lopez-Gonzalez, Javier, 2011. "Towards a New Age in Special and Differential Treatment," Papers 239, World Trade Institute.
    4. Keck, Alexander & Low, Patrick, 2004. "Special and differential treatment in the WTO: Why, when and how?," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2004-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    5. Mehdi Abbas, 2009. "Mondialisation et développement. Que nous enseigne l'enlisement des négociations commerciales de l'OMC ?," Post-Print halshs-00443793, HAL.
    6. Yanai, Akiko, 2013. "Rethinking special and differential treatment in the WTO," IDE Discussion Papers 435, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    7. Salvador Gil-Pareja & Rafael Llorca-Vivero & José Antonio Martínez-Serrano, 2018. "Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: which have been best to promote exports?," Working Papers 1802, Department of Applied Economics II, Universidad de Valencia.
    8. Joseph E. Stiglitz & Andrew Charlton, 2005. "Un cycle de négociations commerciales pour le développement ?," Revue d’économie du développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 13(4), pages 17-54.
    9. Holmes, Peter & Lopez-Gonzalez, Javier & MILE 02, Anirudh Shingal, 2011. "TRIPS and Special & Differential Treatment – Revisiting the Case for Derogations in Applying Patent Protection for Pharmaceuticals in Developing Count," Papers 238, World Trade Institute.
    10. Samuel K. Gayi, 2006. "Does the WTO Agreement on Agriculture Endanger Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa?," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-60, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Aradhna Aggrawal, 2003. "The WTO antidumping code: Issues for review in Post-Doha negotiations," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 99, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    12. Mehdi Abbas, 2007. "Les rapports Nord-Sud à l'OMC. Entre différenciation et espace politique pour le développement," Post-Print halshs-00200561, HAL.
    13. Salvador Gil-Pareja & Rafael Llorca-Vivero & José Antonio Martínez-Serrano, 2019. "Reciprocal vs nonreciprocal trade agreements: Which have been best to promote exports?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Mohammad Shah Alam, 2001. "Making The Special And Differential Provisions Of Wto Agreements Effective For The Least Developed Countries: Perspectives From Bangladesh," CPD Working Paper 13, Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).
    15. Syed Hasanat SHAH & Hafsa HASNAT* & Sarath DELPACHITRA***, 2019. "Did the WTO Promote Growth, Trade and Foreign Direct Investment in South Asia?," Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, Applied Economics Research Centre, vol. 29(2), pages 165-179.
    16. Draper, Peter & Freytag, Andreas & Doyaili, Sarah Al, 2013. "Why should Sub-Saharan Africa care about the Doha Development Round?," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 7, pages 1-26.
    17. Sun, Ning & Yao, Hongxin, 2011. "Manipulable behavior in international trade," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 60-66.
    18. Kokko, Ari & Gustavsson Tingvall, Patrik & Videnord, Josefin, 2017. "Which Antidumping Cases Reach the WTO?," Ratio Working Papers 286, The Ratio Institute.
    19. Hatice Jenkins & Glenn Jenkins, 2007. "Incidence Of The Wto Anti-discrimination Rules On Corporation Income Taxation," Working Paper 1123, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    20. Kerr, William A., 2012. "The EU-Canada Free Trade Agreement: What is on the Table for Agriculture?," 86th Annual Conference, April 16-18, 2012, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 135067, Agricultural Economics Society.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    F100; F110; F130; F150;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:fortra:v:50:y:2015:i:1:p:31-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.