IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v19y1995i3p274-293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Specifying Inclusion Criteria for a Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony J. Petrosino

    (National Institute of Justice Graduate Research Fellow)

Abstract

One of the most important stages of a meta-analysis is specifying the inclusion criteria. In other words, what studies will be included in or excluded from the quantitative review? How are these decisions made? The author presents problems and illustrations from this first phase in an ongoing meta-analysis of crime reduction programs. The eight criteria for including studies in the crime reduction meta-analysis are specified, problematic studies confronted using the criteria are listed, and rules for handling those studies to retain consistency throughout the meta-analysis are discussed. The article concludes with three recommendations for future meta-analyses of this type.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony J. Petrosino, 1995. "Specifying Inclusion Criteria for a Meta-Analysis," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(3), pages 274-293, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:19:y:1995:i:3:p:274-293
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9501900303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9501900303
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9501900303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dunford, Franklyn W., 1990. "Random assignment: Practical considerations from field experiments," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 125-132, January.
    2. H. Laurence Ross & Murray Blumenthal, 1974. "Sanctions for the Drinking Driver: An Experimental Study," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(1), pages 53-62, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ye Zhang, 2020. "Discrimination in the Venture Capital Industry: Evidence from Field Experiments," Papers 2010.16084, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    2. David Weisburd, 2003. "Ethical Practice and Evaluation of Interventions in Crime and Justice," Evaluation Review, , vol. 27(3), pages 336-354, June.
    3. List, John A. & Rasul, Imran, 2011. "Field Experiments in Labor Economics," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 2, pages 103-228, Elsevier.
    4. Joan Petersilia, 1989. "Implementing Randomized Experiments," Evaluation Review, , vol. 13(5), pages 435-458, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:19:y:1995:i:3:p:274-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.