IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v4y1986i3p265-277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

General Revenue Sharing

Author

Listed:
  • C F Adams Jr

    (School of Public Administration, Ohio State University, 1775 College Rd, Columbus, OH 43210, USA)

Abstract

Enacted in 1972, general revenue sharing added a new dimension to the intergovernmental grant system in the United States of America. Unlike traditional categorical grant programs predicated on an externality or some other efficiency-based rationale, revenue sharing addressed issues of vertical and horizontal fiscal imbalances as well as political concerns about the growing influence of the federal bureaucracy in the fiscal affairs of states and localities. Scheduled to terminate at the end of fiscal year 1986, revenue sharing nevertheless remains a viable concept in reckoning the makeup of a well-ordered intergovernmental grant system. It is with an eye toward future deliberations about such a program that this paper is written. The findings from six years of research at the Brookings Institution are drawn upon, and a review is given of the lessons learned about the role of such a program and how the design of any future revenue sharing program might be enhanced, with specific emphasis on greater equity and more effective integration of federal and state roles in addressing the causes and consequences of local-area fiscal disparities.

Suggested Citation

  • C F Adams Jr, 1986. "General Revenue Sharing," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 4(3), pages 265-277, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:4:y:1986:i:3:p:265-277
    DOI: 10.1068/c040265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c040265
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c040265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adams, Charles Jr. & Storbeck, James E., 1983. "Sorting urban development strategies in a federal system : An information theoretic approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 71-77.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:4:y:1986:i:3:p:265-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.