IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v34y2016i5p900-926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building consensus for network power? Some reflections on strategic spatial planning in the North West region of England

Author

Listed:
  • Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat
  • Mark Baker

Abstract

This case study of collaborative regional spatial planning in the North West region of England seeks to understand if ‘network power’ provides a sufficient incentive for the politically stronger and institutionally established players (particularly local government) to adopt a more flexible approach to consensus building. An observed failure in this respect, due to the overwhelming strength of the parochial interests of local government under network governance, leads to a suggestion to incentivise greater collaboration and consensus building at the strategic level through what has been termed ‘meta-governed citizen power’.

Suggested Citation

  • Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat & Mark Baker, 2016. "Building consensus for network power? Some reflections on strategic spatial planning in the North West region of England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(5), pages 900-926, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:34:y:2016:i:5:p:900-926
    DOI: 10.1177/0263774X15614690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263774X15614690
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0263774X15614690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carol Hager, 2012. "Revisiting the Ungovernability Debate: Regional Governance and Sprawl in the USA and UK," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 817-830, July.
    2. Mark Baker & Cecilia Wong, 2013. "The Delusion of Strategic Spatial Planning: What's Left After the Labour Government's English Regional Experiment?," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 83-103, February.
    3. Patsy Healey, 2012. "Strategic Planning for Contemporary Urban Regions: City of Cities: A project for Milan," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 497-498.
    4. Peter W. Roberts Shaw & M. Greg Lloyd, 2000. "Regional Development Agencies in England: New Strategic Regional Planning Issues?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 75-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. C. Fuller & R. J. Bennett & M. Ramsden, 2002. "The Economic Development Role of English RDAs: The Need for Greater Discretionary Power," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 421-428.
    2. Peter Roberts & Paul Benneworth, 2001. "Pathways to the Future? An Initial Assessment of RDA Strategies and their Contribution to Integrated Regional Development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 16(2), pages 142-159, May.
    3. Darren Webb & Clive Collis, 2000. "Regional Development Agencies and the 'New Regionalism' in England," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9), pages 857-864.
    4. Mohammed Adil Sait & Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Iqbal Hamiduddin & Walter Timo De Vries, 2018. "Renewable Energy as an Underutilised Resource in Cities: Germany’s ‘Energiewende’ and Lessons for Post-Brexit Cities in the United Kingdom," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Ian Gordon & Tony Champion, 2021. "Towards a sustainable, negotiated mode of strategic regional planning: a political economy perspective," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 115-126, January.
    6. Steven Musson & Adam Tickell & Peter John, 2005. "A Decade of Decentralisation? Assessing the Role of the Government Offices for the English Regions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(8), pages 1395-1412, August.
    7. Anna Growe & Mark Baker & Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat, 2020. "The Legitimation of Planning Processes as a Challenge to Metropolitan Governance," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, June.
    8. Victoria Habermehl & Beth Perry, 2021. "The Risk Of Austerity Co‐Production In City‐Regional Governance In England," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 555-571, May.
    9. Mee Kam Ng & Caglar Koksal & Cecilia Wong & Yuanzhou Tang, 2022. "Smart and Sustainable Development from a Spatial Planning Perspective: The Case of Shenzhen and Greater Manchester," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-28, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:34:y:2016:i:5:p:900-926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.