IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v26y1999i5p711-726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rank Order for a Rehabilitation Program Using Multiple Criteria

Author

Listed:
  • G Concilio
  • P Korhonen
  • M Soismaa

Abstract

In this study we investigate an urban planning problem where an area is to be rehabilitated. The area is divided into several subareas any of which could be the starting point for the rehabilitation process. The ultimate goal is to find a rank order for the alternative subareas which specifies the rehabilitation process. If all information were given on the ordinal scale, we could use, for example, the classical minimum violation principle to solve this problem. In this paper, we have generalized this approach to cover the cardinal scale and pairwise information.

Suggested Citation

  • G Concilio & P Korhonen & M Soismaa, 1999. "Rank Order for a Rehabilitation Program Using Multiple Criteria," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 26(5), pages 711-726, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:26:y:1999:i:5:p:711-726
    DOI: 10.1068/b260711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b260711
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b260711?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P Nijkamp, 1982. "Soft Multicriteria Analysis as a Tool in Urban Land-Use Planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 9(2), pages 197-208, June.
    2. Korhonen, Pekka, 1988. "A visual reference direction approach to solving discrete multiple criteria problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 152-159, March.
    3. Korhonen, Pekka J., 1986. "A hierarchical interactive method for ranking alternatives with multiple qualitative criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 265-276, February.
    4. H Voogd, 1982. "Multicriteria Evaluation with Mixed Qualitative and Quantitative Data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 9(2), pages 221-236, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. P. Korhonen & J. Karaivanova, 1998. "An Algorithm for Projecting a Reference Direction onto the Nondominated Set of Given Points," Working Papers ir98011, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    2. Guh, Yuh-Yuan, 1997. "Introduction to a new weighting method -- Hierarchy consistency analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 215-226, October.
    3. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    4. Hajkowicz, Stefan & Higgins, Andrew, 2008. "A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 255-265, January.
    5. Ngwenyama, Ojelanki K. & Bryson, Noel, 1999. "Eliciting and mapping qualitative preferences to numeric rankings in group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(3), pages 487-497, August.
    6. Eun-Sung Chung & Won-Pyo Hong & Kil Lee & Steven Burian, 2011. "Integrated Use of a Continuous Simulation Model and Multi-Attribute Decision-Making for Ranking Urban Watershed Management Alternatives," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(2), pages 641-659, January.
    7. Stewart, Theodor J., 1999. "Evaluation and refinement of aspiration-based methods in MCDM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 643-652, March.
    8. Hsu-Shih Shih, 2016. "A Mixed-Data Evaluation in Group TOPSIS with Differentiated Decision Power," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 537-565, May.
    9. G Özerol & E Karasakal, 2008. "Interactive outranking approaches for multicriteria decision-making problems with imprecise information," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(9), pages 1253-1268, September.
    10. P Nijkamp, 1983. "Information Systems for Regional Development Planning: A State-of-the-Art Survey," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 10(3), pages 283-302, September.
    11. Asim Roy & Patrick Mackin & Jyrki Wallenius & James Corner & Mark Keith & Gregory Schymik & Hina Arora, 2008. "An Interactive Search Method Based on User Preferences," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 203-229, December.
    12. Sun, Minghe & Steuer, Ralph E., 1996. "InterQuad: An interactive quad tree based procedure for solving the discrete alternative multiple criteria problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 462-472, March.
    13. Wątróbski, Jarosław & Jankowski, Jarosław & Ziemba, Paweł & Karczmarczyk, Artur & Zioło, Magdalena, 2019. "Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 107-124.
    14. P. Korhonen & A. Siljamaeki & M. Soismaa, 1998. "Practical Aspects of Value Efficiency Analysis," Working Papers ir98042, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    15. Miettinen, Kaisa & Molina, Julián & González, Mercedes & Hernández-Díaz, Alfredo & Caballero, Rafael, 2009. "Using box indices in supporting comparison in multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 17-24, August.
    16. Xiaoping Li & Dan Zhu, 2011. "Object technology software selection: a case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 5-24, May.
    17. Korhonen, Pekka & Soleimani-damaneh, Majid & Wallenius, Jyrki, 2016. "Dual cone approach to convex-cone dominance in multiple criteria decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 1139-1143.
    18. Panagiotis Ravanos & Giannis Karagiannis, 2022. "In search for the Most Preferred Solution in Value Efficiency Analysis," Discussion Paper Series 2022_05, Department of Economics, University of Macedonia, revised Jul 2022.
    19. Korhonen, Pekka J. & Wallenius, Jyrki & Genc, Tolga & Xu, Peng, 2021. "On rational behavior in multi-attribute riskless choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 331-342.
    20. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid, 2018. "Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 462-471.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:26:y:1999:i:5:p:711-726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.