IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v53y2021i7p1770-1788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differentiation under capitalism: Genesis and consequences of the rent gap

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng Liu
  • Yu Deng
  • Weixuan Song
  • Qiyan Wu
  • Jian Gong

Abstract

Uneven development theory and its corollary (i.e. rent-gap theory) are either excessively general or insufficiently flexible to expound the variations of gentrification with unique historical trajectories. A representative example is education-led gentrification in China. The lacuna restricts the explanatory power of rent-gap theory and justifies the fault line between the rent gap and two important phenomena: the forms of displacement identified by Marcuse and territorial stigmatisation. This paper recasts Neil Smith's insights about uneven development from two perspectives, temporal and social differentiations, and elaborates how the interplay between both differences engenders territorial stigmatisation and displacement. Moreover, as two diametrically opposed phenomena, territorial glorification (e.g. super-gentrification and education-led gentrification) and territorial stigmatisation are simultaneously situated in one framework, which is evaluated in education-led gentrification in Nanjing. Redirecting the empirical research from global cities to less established but more representative urban centres, this research shows the potentially wide applicability of the theoretical framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng Liu & Yu Deng & Weixuan Song & Qiyan Wu & Jian Gong, 2021. "Differentiation under capitalism: Genesis and consequences of the rent gap," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(7), pages 1770-1788, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:53:y:2021:i:7:p:1770-1788
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X211032978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X211032978
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X211032978?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Johnson & John McMillan & Christopher Woodruff, 2002. "Property Rights and Finance," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1335-1356, December.
    2. Elvin Wyly, 2019. "The Evolving State of Gentrification," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 110(1), pages 12-25, February.
    3. Chiara Valli, 2015. "A Sense of Displacement: Long-time Residents' Feelings of Displacement in Gentrifying Bushwick, New York," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1191-1208, November.
    4. Ernesto Lopez‐Morales, 2011. "Gentrification by Ground Rent Dispossession: The Shadows Cast by Large‐Scale Urban Renewal in Santiago de Chile," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 330-357, March.
    5. Ernesto López-Morales & Claudia Sanhueza & Sebastián Espinoza & Felipe Ordenes & Hernán Orozco, 2019. "Rent gap formation due to public infrastructure and planning policies: An analysis of Greater Santiago, Chile, 2008–2011," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(7), pages 1536-1557, October.
    6. Chris Hamnett, 2009. "The new Mikado? Tom Slater, gentrification and displacement," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 476-482, December.
    7. Thomas Sigler & David Wachsmuth, 2020. "New directions in transnational gentrification: Tourism-led, state-led and lifestyle-led urban transformations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3190-3201, November.
    8. Eliza Darling, 2005. "The City in the Country: Wilderness Gentrification and the Rent Gap," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(6), pages 1015-1032, June.
    9. Tom Slater, 2009. "Missing Marcuse: On gentrification and displacement," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2-3), pages 292-311, June.
    10. Fulong Wu, 1997. "Urban restructuring in China’s emerging market economy: towards a framework for analysis," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 640-663, December.
    11. Qiyan Wu & Xiaoling Zhang & Paul Waley, 2017. "When Neil Smith met Pierre Bourdieu in Nanjing, China: bringing cultural capital into rent gap theory," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 659-677, July.
    12. Loretta Lees, 2009. "Urban Renaissance in an Urban Recession: The End of Gentrification?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(7), pages 1529-1533, July.
    13. Megan Nethercote, 2020. "Build-to-Rent and the financialization of rental housing: future research directions," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 839-874, May.
    14. Mervyn Horgan, 2018. "Territorial Stigmatization and Territorial Destigmatization: A Cultural Sociology of Symbolic Strategy in the Gentrification of Parkdale (Toronto)," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 500-516, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Davidson, 2011. "Critical Commentary. Gentrification in Crisis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(10), pages 1987-1996, August.
    2. Lai, Yani & Tang, Bosin & Chen, Xiangsheng & Zheng, Xian, 2021. "Spatial determinants of land redevelopment in the urban renewal processes in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Yasna Contreras & Thierry Lulle & Óscar Figueroa, 2017. "Cambios sociespaciales en las ciudades latinoamericanas: ¿procesos de gentrificación?," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, number 112, April.
    4. Emma Jackson & Tim Butler, 2015. "Revisiting ‘social tectonics’: The middle classes and social mix in gentrifying neighbourhoods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(13), pages 2349-2365, October.
    5. Nadine Marquardt & Henning Füller & Georg Glasze & Robert Pütz, 2013. "Shaping the Urban Renaissance: New-build Luxury Developments in Berlin," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(8), pages 1540-1556, June.
    6. Benjamin Preis & Aarthi Janakiraman & Alex Bob & Justin Steil, 2021. "Mapping gentrification and displacement pressure: An exploration of four distinct methodologies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(2), pages 405-424, February.
    7. Hyun Bang Shin & Soo-Hyun Kim, 2016. "The developmental state, speculative urbanisation and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 540-559, February.
    8. Robert Webb & Duncan Watson & Steven Cook, 2021. "Price adjustment in the London housing market," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(1), pages 113-130, January.
    9. Brett Christophers, 2022. "Mind the rent gap: Blackstone, housing investment and the reordering of urban rent surfaces," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 698-716, March.
    10. Stephen Danley & Rasheda Weaver, 2018. "“They’re Not Building It for Us”: Displacement Pressure, Unwelcomeness, and Protesting Neighborhood Investment," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, September.
    11. López-Morales, Ernesto & Sanhueza, Claudia & Herrera, Nicolás & Espinoza, Sebastián & Mosso, Vicente, 2023. "Land and housing price increases due to metro effect: An empirical analysis of Santiago, Chile, 2008–2019," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    12. David Wachsmuth & Alexander Weisler, 2018. "Airbnb and the rent gap: Gentrification through the sharing economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1147-1170, September.
    13. Kapeliushnikov, Rostislav & Kuznetsov, Andrei & Demina, Natalia & Kuznetsova, Olga, 2013. "Threats to security of property rights in a transition economy: An empirical perspective," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 245-264.
    14. Fernando M. Aragon, 2014. "Do better property rights improve local income?: Evidence from First Nations' treaties," Discussion Papers dp14-02, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
    15. Marina Diakonova & Luis Molina & Hannes Mueller & Javier J. Pérez & Cristopher Rauh, 2022. "The information content of conflict, social unrest and policy uncertainty measures for macroeconomic forecasting," Working Papers 2232, Banco de España.
    16. Luc Laeven & Christopher Woodruff, 2007. "The Quality of the Legal System, Firm Ownership, and Firm Size," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 89(4), pages 601-614, November.
    17. Andrea Asoni, 2008. "Protection Of Property Rights And Growth As Political Equilibria," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(5), pages 953-987, December.
    18. Mezaroş, Mădălina & Paccoud, Antoine, 2022. "Accelerating housing inequality: property investors and the changing structure of property ownership in Luxembourg," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 116432, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    20. Ingmar Pastak & Anneli KÄHRIK, 2021. "SYMBOLIC DISPLACEMENT REVISITED: Place‐making Narratives in Gentrifying Neighbourhoods of Tallinn," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 814-834, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:53:y:2021:i:7:p:1770-1788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.