IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v53y2021i5p917-936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drawing up the missing link: State-society relations and the remaking of urban landscapes in Chinese cities

Author

Listed:
  • George C S Lin

Abstract

Studies of China’s urban transformation are characterized by diverse interpretations of the relevance of the theory of neoliberalism and continuing tension of epistemology vis-à -vis ontology. This research foregrounds state-society interplay as an alternative lens and analytical tool to understand China’s urban transformation in the context of neoliberalization and global urbanism. The remaking of the Chinese urban landscape is found to be shaped not simply by forces of agglomeration economies or bid-rent dynamism but more by the contestation and negotiation between a fragmented authoritarian state and a rapidly changing society. Existing land users are motivated by a decentralized power of decision-making and a share of the land conveyance income previously monopolized by the state. Contrary to normal expectation, urban redevelopment plays a role of greater significance in the local land supply of those cities in some less advanced regions than in the demographically dense and economically advanced regions. Administratively, urban redevelopment tends to prevail in those modes of land disposition that are either monopolized by the state or subject to close-door negotiation. Redevelopment is less contentious in a “village-in-the-city†where decisions are made by the collective organization internally than the other involving developers externally. Land use intensity and efficiency have been improved along with intensified social exclusion and marginalization. Drawing up the missing link concerning state-society relations may provide new insights to solve the myth of an urban China so ambivalent when seen in the lens of neoliberalism and help reconcile methodological tension in the studies of comparative urbanism involving China.

Suggested Citation

  • George C S Lin, 2021. "Drawing up the missing link: State-society relations and the remaking of urban landscapes in Chinese cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(5), pages 917-936, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:53:y:2021:i:5:p:917-936
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X20986813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X20986813
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X20986813?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaobo Su, 2012. "Transnational Regionalization and the Rescaling of the Chinese State," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(6), pages 1327-1347, June.
    2. Li Tian, 2008. "The Chengzhongcun Land Market in China: Boon or Bane? — A Perspective on Property Rights," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 282-304, June.
    3. David Ley & Sin Yih Teo, 2020. "Is Comparative Gentrification Possible? Sceptical Voices from Hong Kong," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 166-172, January.
    4. Anthony Howell & Chong Liu & Rudai Yang, 2020. "Explaining the urban premium in Chinese cities and the role of place-based policies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1332-1356, October.
    5. Jamie Peck, 2017. "Transatlantic city, part 2: Late entrepreneurialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(2), pages 327-363, February.
    6. Hsing, You-tien, 2010. "The Great Urban Transformation: Politics of Land and Property in China," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199568048.
    7. Shiuh‐shen Chien & Max D. Woodworth, 2018. "China's Urban Speed Machine: The Politics of Speed and Time in a Period of Rapid Urban Growth," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 723-737, July.
    8. Jamie Peck, 2015. "Cities beyond Compare?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 160-182, January.
    9. Anne Haila, 2007. "The Market as the New Emperor," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 3-20, March.
    10. Fan Wu & Ling-Hin Li & Sue Yurim Han, 2018. "Social Sustainability and Redevelopment of Urban Villages in China: A Case Study of Guangzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Shenjing He & Mengzhu Zhang & Zongcai Wei, 2020. "The state project of crisis management: China’s Shantytown Redevelopment Schemes under state-led financialization," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(3), pages 632-653, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shenjing He & Junxi Qian, 2017. "From an emerging market to a multifaceted urban society: Urban China studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 827-846, March.
    2. Fulong Wu, 2016. "China's Emergent City-Region Governance: A New Form of State Spatial Selectivity through State-orchestrated Rescaling," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1134-1151, November.
    3. Lin Jiang & Yani Lai & Ke Chen & Xiao Tang, 2022. "What Drives Urban Village Redevelopment in China? A Survey of Literature Based on Web of Science Core Collection Database," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Fulong Wu, 2018. "Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1383-1399, May.
    5. Yunpeng Zhang, 2022. "Feature town development for inclusive urban development? The case of the Jadeware Feature Town in Yangzhou, China," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 22(1), pages 72-89, January.
    6. Yunpeng Zhang, 2022. "TEMPORAL POLITICS AND INJUSTICE IN MEGA URBANIZATION: Lessons from Yangzhou, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 558-575, July.
    7. Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Development, Inequality and Urban Villages in China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 885-889, December.
    8. Yu Zhou & George CS Lin & Jun Zhang, 2019. "Urban China through the lens of neoliberalism: Is a conceptual twist enough?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(1), pages 33-43, January.
    9. Youliang Guo & Chengguo Zhang & Ya Ping Wang & Xun Li, 2018. "(De-)Activating the growth machine for redevelopment: The case of Liede urban village in Guangzhou," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1420-1438, May.
    10. Özgür Sayın & Michael Hoyler & John Harrison, 2022. "Doing comparative urbanism differently: Conjunctural cities and the stress-testing of urban theory," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 263-280, February.
    11. Sa, Haoxuan, 2020. "Do ambiguous property rights matter? Collective value logic in Lin Village," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Fulong Wu, 2020. "Scripting Indian and Chinese urban spatial transformation: Adding new narratives to gentrification and suburbanisation research," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(6), pages 980-997, September.
    13. Haoxuan Sa, 2021. "Urban Village Shareholding: Cooperative Economic Organization in Northeast China," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 665-697, March.
    14. Michael Hoyler & John Harrison, 2017. "Global cities research and urban theory making," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(12), pages 2853-2858, December.
    15. Xizan Jin & Tachia Chin & Junli Yu & Yanjiang Zhang & Yingshuang Shi, 2020. "How Government’s Policy Implementation Methods Influence Urban Villagers’ Acceptance of Urban Revitalization Programs: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Li Tian, 2014. "Property Rights, Land Values and Urban Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15856.
    17. Chris Hamnett, 2020. "Is Chinese urbanisation unique?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 690-700, February.
    18. Junxi Qian & Ning An, 2021. "URBAN THEORY BETWEEN POLITICAL ECONOMY AND EVERYDAY URBANISM: Desiring Machine and Power in a Saga of Urbanization," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 679-695, July.
    19. Bin Li & Kaihan Yang & Konstantin E. Axenov & Long Zhou & Huiming Liu, 2022. "Trade-Offs, Adaptation and Adaptive Governance of Urban Regeneration in Guangzhou, China (2009–2019)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Pan, Wenjian & Du, Juan, 2021. "Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:53:y:2021:i:5:p:917-936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.