IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v49y2017i10p2342-2361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emplacing Indigeneity and rurality in neoliberal disability welfare reform: The lived experience of Aboriginal people with disabilities in the West Kimberley, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Soldatic
  • Kelly Somers
  • Kim Spurway
  • Georgia van Toorn

Abstract

This article maps the impact of neoliberal restructuring of disability services and income support measures on Aboriginal people with disabilities living in rural areas of the West Kimberley in Australia. The international literature has extensively documented disability and Indigenous neoliberal welfare retraction measures, though as discrete areas of research. We aim to emplace the intersectional experience of such reforms by exposing their unique and qualitatively different dynamics and processes of disablement and Indigenous dispossession in the lived experiences of Aboriginal Australians with disabilities in rural Australia. Interviews conducted with Aboriginal people with disabilities living in the West Kimberley revealed the impact of neoliberal policies of retracting disability supports and rationalising services. The effects were felt in terms of people’s mobility, autonomy and economic security, with chronic, and at times crisis, levels of socio-economic insecurity experienced. Neoliberal spatial structures have led to further peripheralisation of rural and remote populations and a resulting increase in levels of inequality, deprivation and marginalisation for Aboriginal Australians with disabilities, who endure and survive by navigating these disabling spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Soldatic & Kelly Somers & Kim Spurway & Georgia van Toorn, 2017. "Emplacing Indigeneity and rurality in neoliberal disability welfare reform: The lived experience of Aboriginal people with disabilities in the West Kimberley, Australia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(10), pages 2342-2361, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:49:y:2017:i:10:p:2342-2361
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X17718374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X17718374
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X17718374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peck, Jamie & Theodore, Nikolas, 2000. "Commentary: 'Work First': Workfare and the Regulation of Contingent Labour Markets," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 24(1), pages 119-138, January.
    2. Youping Li & Jie Shuai, 2017. "Vertical separation with location–price competition," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 255-266, July.
    3. Manfred Kühn, 2015. "Peripheralization: Theoretical Concepts Explaining Socio-Spatial Inequalities," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 367-378, February.
    4. David Martin & Philip Brigham & Paul Roderick & Sarah Barnett & Ian Diamond, 2000. "The (mis)Representation of Rural Deprivation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(4), pages 735-751, April.
    5. ., 2017. "Trade and FDI revisited: the role of location," Chapters, in: The Development of International Business, chapter 5, pages 46-56, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maite Blázquez, 2009. "Earnings mobility in Spain: the role of job mobility and contractual arrangements," Spanish Economic Review, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 179-205, September.
    2. Haddad, Lawrence James & Adato, Michelle, 2001. "How effectively do public works programs transfer benefits to the poor?," FCND briefs 108, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Karen Soldatic & Helen Meekosha, 2012. "The Place of Disgust: Disability, Class and Gender in Spaces of Workfare," Societies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Peichl, Andreas & Siegloch, Sebastian, 2012. "Accounting for labor demand effects in structural labor supply models," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 129-138.
    5. Natalia Zdanowska & Robin Morphet, 2021. "Decentralising the United Kingdom: the Northern Powerhouse strategy and urban ownership links between firms since 2010," Papers 2103.08627, arXiv.org.
    6. Dina Bowman & Michael McGann & Helen Kimberley & Simon Biggs, 2017. "‘Rusty, invisible and threatening’: ageing, capital and employability," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(3), pages 465-482, June.
    7. Herwig Immervoll & Stephen P. Jenkins & Sebastian Königs, 2015. "Are Recipients of Social Assistance 'Benefit Dependent'?: Concepts, Measurement and Results for Selected Countries," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 162, OECD Publishing.
    8. DongJoon Lee & Kangsik Choi & Tatsuhiko Nariu, 2020. "Endogenous vertical structure with network externalities," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 88(6), pages 827-846, December.
    9. Ki‐Dong Lee & Kangsik Choi & DongJoon Lee, 2020. "Endogenous vertical structure and trade policy in an import‐competing market," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(8), pages 1431-1445, December.
    10. Obstfeld, Maurice, 2021. "Two challenges from globalization," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    11. You, Lie & Li, Yurui & Wang, Rui & Pan, Haozhi, 2020. "A benefit evaluation model for build-up land use in megacity suburban districts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Bernard Josef, 2018. "Rural Quality of Life – Poverty, Satisfaction and Opportunity Deprivation in Different Types of Rural Territories," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 191-209, June.
    13. Ophélie Merville & Ludivine Launay & Olivier Dejardin & Quentin Rollet & Joséphine Bryère & Élodie Guillaume & Guy Launoy, 2022. "Can an Ecological Index of Deprivation Be Used at the Country Level? The Case of the French Version of the European Deprivation Index (F-EDI)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Jurgen Essletzbichler, 2003. "From Mass Production to Flexible Specialization: The Sectoral and Geographical Extent of Contract Work in US Manufacturing, 1963-1997," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 753-771.
    15. Georgia van Toorn, 2021. "Neoliberalism’s friends, foes and fellow travellers: What can radical feminist and disability perspectives bring to the policy mobilities approach?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(4), pages 723-740, June.
    16. Karachurina, L. & Mkrtchyan, N., 2023. "Population dynamics of large cities, their suburbs, and periphery in Russia during the intercensal period of 2011-2021," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 61(4), pages 93-109.
    17. Anne Gray, 2002. "Jobseekers and Gatekeepers: the Role of the Private Employment Agency in the Placement of the Unemployed," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 16(4), pages 655-674, December.
    18. Morrison, Nicola & Szumilo, Nikodem, 2019. "Universities’ global research ambitions and their localised effects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 290-301.
    19. Xingtang Wang & Jie Li, 2020. "Downstream rivals’ competition, bargaining, and welfare," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 61-75, September.
    20. Amuedo-Dorantes, Catalina & Serrano-Padial, Ricardo, 2007. "Wage Growth Implications of Fixed-Term Employment: An Analysis by Contract Duration and Job Mobility," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 829-847, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:49:y:2017:i:10:p:2342-2361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.