IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v39y2007i6p1382-1402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Science Park and the Governance Challenge of the Movement of the High-Tech Urban Region towards Polycentricity: The Hsinchu Science-Based Industrial Park

Author

Listed:
  • Tsu-Lung Chou

    (Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, National Taipei University, Taipei, Taiwan)

Abstract

In this paper I explore the governance challenges of science-park-based urban regions by exploring the case study of the Hsinchu science-based industrial park in Taiwan. In contrast to the economic emphasis of new regionalism on regional learning, I investigate the change and development of the high-tech Hsinchu region as it moves towards polycentricity, by exploring how the political processes of multiple and interconnected forces, from international to national and subnational levels, affect spatial-construction and regional governance issues. With reference to the analytical tool of the polycentric urban region (PUR), I highlight that international, national, and subnational forces caused the polycentric development, which in turn has led to governance contradictions and has politically affected the implementations of an ideal mode of the PUR.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsu-Lung Chou, 2007. "The Science Park and the Governance Challenge of the Movement of the High-Tech Urban Region towards Polycentricity: The Hsinchu Science-Based Industrial Park," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(6), pages 1382-1402, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:39:y:2007:i:6:p:1382-1402
    DOI: 10.1068/a38200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a38200
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a38200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Jones, 2001. "The Rise of the Regional State in Economic Governance: ‘Partnerships for Prosperity’ Or New Scales of State Power?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(7), pages 1185-1211, July.
    2. Gordon MacLeod, 2001. "New Regionalism Reconsidered: Globalization and the Remaking of Political Economic Space," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 804-829, December.
    3. Nick Bailey & Ivan Turok, 2001. "Central Scotland as a Polycentric Urban Region: Useful Planning Concept or Chimera?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(4), pages 697-715, April.
    4. Benito Giordano & Elisa Roller, 2003. "A Comparison of City Region Dynamics in the UK, Spain and Italy: More Similarities than Differences?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 911-927.
    5. Kevin Ward & Andrew E G Jonas, 2004. "Competitive City-Regionalism as a Politics of Space: A Critical Reinterpretation of the New Regionalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(12), pages 2119-2139, December.
    6. Alice H. Amsden & Wan-wen Chu, 2003. "Beyond Late Development: Taiwan's Upgrading Policies," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262011980, December.
    7. Saxenian, AnnaLee & Hsu, Jinn-Yuh, 2001. "The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu Connection: Technical Communities and Industrial Upgrading," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 10(4), pages 893-920, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Lecluyse & Mirjam Knockaert & André Spithoven, 2019. "The contribution of science parks: a literature review and future research agenda," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 559-595, April.
    2. Kelsi G. Hobbs & Albert N. Link & John T. Scott, 2017. "Science and technology parks: an annotated and analytical literature review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 957-976, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    2. Philip Boland, 2007. "Unpacking the Theory-Policy Interface of Local Economic Development: An Analysis of Cardiff and Liverpool," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(5-6), pages 1019-1039, May.
    3. Mei-Chih Hu, 2011. "Evolution of knowledge creation and diffusion: the revisit of Taiwan’s Hsinchu Science Park," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(3), pages 949-977, September.
    4. Enrico Gualini & Carola Fricke, 2019. "‘Who governs’ Berlin’s metropolitan region? The strategic-relational construction of metropolitan scale in Berlin–Brandenburg’s economic development policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(1), pages 59-80, February.
    5. Robert Huggins & Nick Clifton, 2011. "Competitiveness, Creativity, and Place-Based Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(6), pages 1341-1362, June.
    6. Lee, Keun, 2005. "Making a Technological Catch-up: Barriers and Opportunities," MPRA Paper 109776, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Harrison, John, 2012. "Towards the new "regional world"?," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Growe, Anna & Heider, Katharina & Lamker, Christian & Paßlick, Sandra & Terfrüchte, Thomas (ed.), Polyzentrale Stadtregionen - Die Region als planerischer Handlungsraum, volume 3, pages 10-21, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    8. Liu, John Jen-wei & Ray, Pradeep Kanta, 2012. "The ‘Triple-alliance’ perspective for new industry creation: Lessons from the flat panel industry in Taiwan," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 585-599.
    9. Philip Allmendinger & Graham Haughton, 2007. "The Fluid Scales and Scope of UK Spatial Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(6), pages 1478-1496, June.
    10. Proinnsias Breathnach, 2014. "Creating City-region Governance Structures in a Dysfunctional Polity: The Case of Ireland’s National Spatial Strategy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2267-2284, August.
    11. Kenney, Martin & Breznitz, Dan & Murphree, Michael, 2013. "Coming back home after the sun rises: Returnee entrepreneurs and growth of high tech industries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 391-407.
    12. Rajah Rasiah & Yap Xiao Shan & Yap Su Fei, 2015. "Sticky Spots on Slippery Slopes: The Development of the Integrated Circuits Industry in Emerging East Asia," Institutions and Economies (formerly known as International Journal of Institutions and Economies), Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, vol. 7(1), pages 52-79, April.
    13. Keith Jacobs, 2004. "Waterfront Redevelopment: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Policy-making Process within the Chatham Maritime Project," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(4), pages 817-832, April.
    14. David W Edgington & Roger Hayter, 2012. "New Relationships between Japanese and Taiwanese Electronics Firms," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(1), pages 68-88, January.
    15. Mustafa Kemal BayirbaÄŸ, 2010. "Local Entrepreneurialism and State Rescaling in Turkey," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(2), pages 363-385, February.
    16. Ouyang, Hongwu Sam, 2006. "Agency problem, institutions, and technology policy: Explaining Taiwan's semiconductor industry development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1314-1328, November.
    17. Balaji Parthasarathy & Yuko Aoyama, 2006. "From Software Services to R&D Services: Local Entrepreneurship in the Software Industry in Bangalore, India," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(7), pages 1269-1285, July.
    18. Rajah Rasiah & Xinxin Kong & Yeo Lin, 2010. "Innovation and learning in the integrated circuits industry in Taiwan and China," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 225-246.
    19. Jyh-Wen Shiu & Chan-Yuan Wong & Mei-Chih Hu, 2014. "The dynamic effect of knowledge capitals in the public research institute: insights from patenting analysis of ITRI (Taiwan) and ETRI (Korea)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 2051-2068, March.
    20. Yusuf, Shahid & Nabeshima, Kaoru, 2005. "Japan's changing industrial landscape," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3758, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:39:y:2007:i:6:p:1382-1402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.