IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v31y1999i4p597-611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The State, Rural Environments, and Globalisation: ‘Action at a Distance’ via the Australian Landcare Program

Author

Listed:
  • S Lockie

    (Rural Social and Economic Research Centre, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton QLD 4702, Australia)

Abstract

Contrary to the suggestion that transnational capital has largely subsumed the agency of Australian governments and farmers in shaping rural environments, in this paper I argue that new, often indirect, forms of action have developed within the context of globalisation and neoliberalism. These may be described as forms of ‘action at a distance’, oriented towards shaping both the environment within which people make decisions and the ways in which they are likely to respond to that environment. Since 1989, the National Landcare Program has mobilised around 30% of farm businesses to participate in community Landcare groups based on principles of self-help, cooperation, and localised action. This has initiated a new phase of negotiation over the delimitation of objects of governance, and facilitated the deployment of novel forms of state influence. Of particular importance have been technologies of knowledge that promote the further intensification of agriculture as environmentally rational and responsible, a trend reinforced by the vast bulk of neoliberal agricultural policy. Although neoliberal policy and local Landcare action appear contradictory, they do appear consistent with the self-understandings of Australian farmers as independent and self-reliant—understandings that render more direct forms of state intervention problematic. It thus remains to be seen how profoundly Landcare will reshape rural landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • S Lockie, 1999. "The State, Rural Environments, and Globalisation: ‘Action at a Distance’ via the Australian Landcare Program," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(4), pages 597-611, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:31:y:1999:i:4:p:597-611
    DOI: 10.1068/a310597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a310597
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a310597?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bresnihan, Patrick, 2019. "The (Slow) Tragedy of Improvement: Neoliberalism, Fisheries Management & the Institutional Commons," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 210-220.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:31:y:1999:i:4:p:597-611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.