IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v30y1998i6p1055-1076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indicators of Deprivation in People and Places: Longitudinal Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • A Sloggett

    (Centre for Population Studies, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, England)

  • H Joshi

    (Social Statistics Research Unit, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, England)

Abstract

The Office for National Statistics Longitudinal Study of England and Wales is used to describe the prevalence in individuals, over time, of a set of variables commonly used in the construction of indicators of area deprivation. These variables are: housing tenure, car access, low skill, and unemployment. Over three censuses between 1971 and 1991, these states appear neither completely permanent nor entirely random. The picture is one of changing fortunes; many individuals temporarily disadvantaged revolving around a core of those experiencing more long-term disadvantage. This is especially true of unemployment. Used in multivariate models to predict health and deprivation outcomes in 1991, the individual characteristics from both 1971 and 1981 have stronger predictive power than ward scores on deprivation indicators. The relation between spatial mobility and the health and social outcomes appears favourable only for young adults.

Suggested Citation

  • A Sloggett & H Joshi, 1998. "Indicators of Deprivation in People and Places: Longitudinal Perspectives," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(6), pages 1055-1076, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:30:y:1998:i:6:p:1055-1076
    DOI: 10.1068/a301055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a301055
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a301055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M G Bradford & B T Robson & R Tye, 1995. "Constructing an Urban Deprivation Index: A Way of Meeting the Need for Flexibility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(4), pages 519-533, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Norman, Paul & Boyle, Paul & Rees, Philip, 2005. "Selective migration, health and deprivation: a longitudinal analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 2755-2771, June.
    2. Boyle, Paul J. & Norman, Paul & Popham, Frank, 2009. "Social mobility: Evidence that it can widen health inequalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 1835-1842, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karen Witten & Daniel Exeter & Adrian Field, 2003. "The Quality of Urban Environments: Mapping Variation in Access to Community Resources," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 161-177, January.
    2. Ian Hodge & Jessica Dunn & Sarah Monk & Caroline Kiddle, 2000. "An Exploration of ‘Bundles' as Indicators of Rural Disadvantage," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(10), pages 1869-1887, October.
    3. C Connolly & M Chisholm, 1999. "The Use of Indicators for Targeting Public Expenditure: The Index of Local Deprivation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(4), pages 463-482, August.
    4. Allan Brimicombe, 2000. "Constructing and Evaluating Contextual Indices Using GIS: A Case of Primary School Performance Tables," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(11), pages 1909-1933, November.
    5. C Gardiner, 1998. "Improvements, by Using a New Set of Data, to the English Standard Spending Assessments: The 1991 Census of Population Samples of Anonymised Records," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 16(5), pages 543-558, October.
    6. Peter Kitchen, 2001. "An Approach for Measuring Urban Deprivation Change: The Example of East Montréal and the Montréal Urban Community, 1986 – 96," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(11), pages 1901-1921, November.
    7. Chris Gardiner, 1998. "Developing Indicators to Assess the Potential for Urban Regeneration: Improvements Using the 1991 Census of Population Samples of Anonymised Records," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(9), pages 1519-1540, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:30:y:1998:i:6:p:1055-1076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.