IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v27y1995i9p1437-1461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Hollowing out’ the Local State: Compulsory Competitive Tendering and the Restructuring of British Public Sector Services

Author

Listed:
  • A Patterson

    (Department of Human and Environmental Sciences, Brunel University, Borough Road, Isleworth, Middx TW7 5DU, England)

  • P L Pinch

    (Geography and Environment Division, School of Land Management and Urban Policy, South Bank University, Wandsworth Road, London SW8 2JZ, England)

Abstract

The process of compulsory competitive tendering (CCT) for the provision of local-government services has forced significant changes to the way in which such services have been provided, whether such services have been contracted out or remain in-house, and has spawned a considerable literature on the impact of these changes on the quality, reach, and cost of public services. The primary focus of this literature has been on service users (or ‘consumers’) and the local taxpayer. In this paper, however, we attempt an analysis of these changes in terms of their impact on the nature of work within public sector services. Empirical evidence of geographical and sectoral variations in the degree of success of the private sector in winning contracts is considered, and explanations for these variations are offered. In particular, the discussion focuses on variations in the form of work in different sectors and the treatment of workers in different places and in different types of services, through a study of the labour processes involved and a consideration of the diverse potential for different fractions of capital to benefit from the introduction of CCT. Last, the concept of ‘hollowing out’ is reworked in order to further assist the theorisation of employment and other contemporary changes in the local state.

Suggested Citation

  • A Patterson & P L Pinch, 1995. "‘Hollowing out’ the Local State: Compulsory Competitive Tendering and the Restructuring of British Public Sector Services," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(9), pages 1437-1461, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:27:y:1995:i:9:p:1437-1461
    DOI: 10.1068/a271437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a271437
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a271437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J Peck & M Jones, 1995. "Training and Enterprise Councils: Schumpeterian Workfare State, or What?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(9), pages 1361-1396, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marius Constantin PROFIROIU & Septimiu Rares SZABO, 2016. "Outsourcing vs decentralisation: A comparative analysis in Central and Eastern Europe," Eco-Economics Review, Ecological University of Bucharest, Economics Faculty and Ecology and Environmental Protection Faculty, vol. 2(2), pages 3-26, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin G Ward, 2000. "State Licence, Local Settlements, and the Politics of ‘Branding’ the City," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 18(3), pages 285-300, June.
    2. Mark Purcell & J. Christopher Brown, 2005. "Against the local trap: scale and the study of environment and development," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 5(4), pages 279-297, October.
    3. Andrew Beer & Rebecca Bentley & Emma Baker & Kate Mason & Shelley Mallett & Anne Kavanagh & Tony LaMontagne, 2016. "Neoliberalism, economic restructuring and policy change: Precarious housing and precarious employment in Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(8), pages 1542-1558, June.
    4. J Peck, 1999. "New Labourers? Making a New Deal for the ‘Workless Class’," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(3), pages 345-372, June.
    5. M R Jones, 1997. "Spatial Selectivity of the State? The Regulationist Enigma and Local Struggles over Economic Governance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(5), pages 831-864, May.
    6. Jane Tooke, 2001. "Reforming Adult Education: Struggles over the British State Strategy of Learndirect," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(9), pages 1665-1679, September.
    7. R Huggins, 1997. "Training and Enterprise Councils as Facilitators of a Networked Approach to Local Economic Development: Forms, Mechanisms, and Existing Interpretations," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 15(3), pages 273-284, September.
    8. Danny MacKinnon, 2001. "Regulating Regional Spaces: State Agencies and the Production of Governance in the Scottish Highlands," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(5), pages 823-844, May.
    9. Julie MacLeavy, 2007. "The Six Dimensions of New Labour: Structures, Strategies, and Languages of Neoliberal Legitimacy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(7), pages 1715-1734, July.
    10. Rhys Jones & Mark Goodwin & Martin Jones & Glenn Simpson, 2004. "Devolution, State Personnel, and the Production of New Territories of Governance in the United Kingdom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(1), pages 89-109, January.
    11. Robert Huggins, 1998. "Local Business Co-operation and Training and Enterprise Councils: The Development of Inter-firm Networks," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(9), pages 813-826.
    12. G MacLeod, 1999. "Entrepreneurial Spaces, Hegemony, and State Strategy: The Political Shaping of Privatism in Lowland Scotland," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(2), pages 345-375, February.
    13. B Jessop, 1995. "Towards a Schumpeterian Workfare Regime in Britain? Reflections on Regulation, Governance, and Welfare State," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(10), pages 1613-1626, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:27:y:1995:i:9:p:1437-1461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.