IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v4y1995i2p168-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beliefs and Perceptions of Childbearing Women Choosing Different Primary Health Care Providers

Author

Listed:
  • Lynn Clark Callister

    (Brigham Young University College of Nursing)

Abstract

The beliefs and perceptions of 60 low-risk childbearing women (n = 60) who had either nurse midwives or obstetricians as health care providers are identified in this descriptive phenomenological study. Interviews were conducted following childbirth, and participants completed the Utah Test for the Childbearing Year, which measures beliefs and perceptions about childbearing. There were no significant demographic differences, or significant differences in fear of childbirth, between groups of women having different providers. Mothers with physician caregivers had significantly higher rates of epidural anesthesia for pain management higher levels of reliance on others, and less active participation in childbirth care decisions. Mothers with certified nurse midwives as caregivers participated more actively in childbirth care decisions and emphasized the quality of the birth experience. In this sample, differences in the beliefs and perceptions of women choosing different health care providers are identified. The importance of a philosophical fit with care providers and availability of options that are congruent with the individualized needs of childbearing women is evident from the study findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynn Clark Callister, 1995. "Beliefs and Perceptions of Childbearing Women Choosing Different Primary Health Care Providers," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 4(2), pages 168-180, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:4:y:1995:i:2:p:168-180
    DOI: 10.1177/105477389500400204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/105477389500400204
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/105477389500400204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oakley, Ann, 1985. "Social support in pregnancy: The 'soft' way to increase birthweight?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 21(11), pages 1259-1268, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bollini, Paola & Pampallona, Sandro & Wanner, Philippe & Kupelnick, Bruce, 2009. "Pregnancy outcome of migrant women and integration policy: A systematic review of the international literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 452-461, February.
    2. Marcia A. Coster-Schulz & Marlene C. Mackey, 1998. "The Preterm Labor Experience," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 7(4), pages 335-359, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:4:y:1995:i:2:p:168-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.