Why Regulate Prices? Some Notes on the Price Cap Methods
AbstractWe consider some recent criticisms of price cap methods of regulation, and suggest that many theoretical arguments, based on the so-called Bayesian approach, do not in fact point to practicable alternatives. We then investigate the use of simple and verifiable quantity regulatory methods, i.e. output floors. We find that they may lack of credibility. Moreover, in the prominent case of a multi-product regulated firm, they do not appear to improve the known desirable welfare properties of price caps. As a preliminary conclusion, we retain the opinion that price caps still stand as a sound regulatory method.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by SIPI Spa in its journal Rivista di Politica Economica.
Volume (Year): 92 (2002)
Issue (Month): 2 (March-April)
Contact details of provider:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Giuseppe Coco & Claudio De Vincenti, 2002. "Can regulation increase firm's efficiency?," Working Papers 60, University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Public Economics.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sabrina Marino).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.