Direct and Indirect Effects of Corporatism on Economic Growth
AbstractWe investigate whether corporatist governance negatively affects growth: a) directly through higher transaction costs involved in the policy decision making process; b) indirectly, yielding growth retarding policy decisions. We construct a more accurate data set for 18 OECD countries in the 1960-1993 interval and improve the specification and estimation of the model. We find that corporatist governance and left wing governments do not directly reduce growth, but there are a robust correlations between growth, union pervasiveness and other policy regressors. On average, corporatist (decentralized) countries adopt growth retarding (enhancing) policies, consistently with the hypothesis that corporatism exerts an indirect negative effect on growth.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by SIPI Spa in its journal Rivista di Politica Economica.
Volume (Year): 91 (2001)
Issue (Month): 5 (June)
Contact details of provider:
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- J51 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Trade Unions: Objectives, Structure, and Effects
- P41 - Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sabrina Marino).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.