IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rampas/v2020y2020i35p139-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socio-Economic Viability Of Public Management In The Context Of European Integration Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Irina KOSACH

    (Chernihiv Polytechnic National University, Chernihiv, Ukraine)

  • Anastasiia DUKA

    (Chernihiv Polytechnic National University, Chernihiv, Ukraine)

  • Grygoriy STARCHENKO

    (Chernihiv Polytechnic National University, Chernihiv, Ukraine)

  • Olena MYHAYLOVSKA

    (Chernihiv Polytechnic National University, Chernihiv, Ukraine)

  • Artur ZHAVORONOK

    (Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine)

Abstract

The European Union forms new requirements for the efficiency of public institutions and the gradual transformation of public management. The relationship between the viability of public management to solve internal problems and the dynamics of socio-economic development is obvious. So, the evaluation of the viability of public institutions’ actions related to the socio-economic processes in any country has theoretical and practical significance. The purpose of our study is to assess the socio-economic viability of public management in the context of European integration processes. Within the article, a comprehensive study of the public management viability in EU countries is presented. The specificity of the study is to assess the socio-economic viability of public management on the basis of economic and social indicators of EU countries. According to the overview of scientific works it is a need to use a comprehensive indicator of public management viability evaluation. So, the considerable attention is paid to the deepening of methodical aspects of public management effectiveness on the basis of multicriteria methods. The result of the study is the calculation of the Socio-Economic Viability Index of Public Management. The obtained results prove the relationship between the SocioEconomic Viability Index of Public Management and the progress of economic reforms in the EU, with the possibility of appropriate conclusions for countries to identify strengths and weaknesses, justify priorities and means to achieve them in the context of European integration. These conclusions can be used as a starting point to assess the relationship between the level of development of the European country and the quality of its public management. The study confirmed the thesis on the correlation between the SocioEconomic Viability Index of Public Management and Happy Planet Index, The Global Competitiveness Index, Corruption Perceptions Index, Fragile States Index and ?onfirm the possibility of using this indicator to assess public management quality in EU countries

Suggested Citation

  • Irina KOSACH & Anastasiia DUKA & Grygoriy STARCHENKO & Olena MYHAYLOVSKA & Artur ZHAVORONOK, 2020. "Socio-Economic Viability Of Public Management In The Context Of European Integration Processes," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(35), pages 139-152, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2020:y:2020:i:35:p:139-152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ramp.ase.ro/_data/files/articole/2020/35-09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Knack, Stephen & Kugler, Mark & Manning, Nick, 2002. "Second generation governance indicators," MPRA Paper 25029, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2003.
    2. Jani KINNUNEN & Armenia ANDRONICEANU & Irina GEORGESCU, 2019. "The Role of Economic and Political Features in Classification of Countries-in-Transition by Human Development Index," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(4), pages 26-40.
    3. Michal Pilc, 2017. "Cultural, political and economic roots of the labor market institutional framework in the OECD and post-socialist countries," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(4), pages 713-731, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nováčková Daniela & Peráček Tomáš, 2021. "The Common European Investment Policy and Its Perspectives in the Context of the Achmea Case Law," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 153-169, May.
    2. Ane-Mari ANDRONICEANU & Jani KINNUNEN & Irina GEORGESCU, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Motivations To Start New Businesses: A Panel Data Analysis," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 479-491, November.
    3. Ane-Mari Androniceanu & Raluca Dana Căplescu & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Cosmin Dobrin, 2021. "The Interdependencies between Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and Pollution in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hartwell, Christopher A., 2014. "The impact of institutional volatility on financial volatility in transition economies : a GARCH family approach," BOFIT Discussion Papers 6/2014, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    2. Fazekas,Mihály & Blum,Jurgen Rene, 2021. "Improving Public Procurement Outcomes : Review of Tools and the State of the Evidence Base," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9690, The World Bank.
    3. Andrews, Matthew, 2008. "Are One-Best-Way Models of Effective Government Suitable for Developing Countries?," Working Paper Series rwp08-014, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    4. Dreher, Axel & Kotsogiannis, Christos & McCorriston, Steve, 2007. "Corruption around the world: Evidence from a structural model," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 443-466, September.
    5. Günther G. Schulze & Bambang Suharnoko Sjahrir & Nikita Zakharov, 2016. "Corruption in Russia," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(1), pages 135-171.
    6. Krzysztof Dmytrow & Beata Bieszk-Stolorz, 2021. "Comparison of changes in the labour markets of post-communist countries with other EU member states," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 16(4), pages 741-764, December.
    7. Hartwell, Christopher A., 2014. "The impact of institutional volatility on financial volatility in transition economies: a GARCH family approach," BOFIT Discussion Papers 6/2014, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    8. repec:zbw:bofitp:2014_006 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Agus SUBIANTO & H. MASHOED & Hari SUBAGIO & M. Yunus HARYADI, 2020. "Regional Intergovernmental Cooperation In Marine Natural Resources Policy In Indonesia," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 97-117, June.
    10. Ane-Mari ANDRONICEANU & Jani KINNUNEN & Irina GEORGESCU, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Motivations To Start New Businesses: A Panel Data Analysis," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 479-491, November.
    11. Michener, Gregory, 2015. "Policy Evaluation via Composite Indexes: Qualitative Lessons from International Transparency Policy Indexes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 184-196.
    12. Shabana Mitra, 2013. "Towards a Multidimensional Measure of Governance," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 477-496, June.
    13. Victor Fedosov & Tetiana Paientko, 2017. "Ukrainian Government Bureaucracy: Benefits and Costs for the Society," Business and Management Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 8-19, June.
    14. Nanik ISTIANINGSIH & Ariyanto MASNUN & Widya PRATIWI, 2020. "Managerial Performance Models Through Decision Making And Emotional Intelligence In Public Sector," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(35), pages 153-166, December.
    15. Irina GEORGESCU & Ane-Mari ANDRONICEANU & Jani KINNUNEN, 2020. "A Discriminant Analysis To The Quantification Of Human Development Index Under Economic Inequality," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 1053-1062, November.
    16. Anna BAGIROVA & Olga NOTMAN, 2020. "The Well-Being Of Residents In An Urban Environment: The Case Of A Russian Megapolis," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(35), pages 124-138, December.
    17. Wehner, Joachim & de Renzio, Paolo, 2013. "Citizens, Legislators, and Executive Disclosure: The Political Determinants of Fiscal Transparency," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 96-108.
    18. Iryna TKACHUK & Olena VINNYCHUK, 2020. "Impact Of Specific Macroeconomic Indicators On The Formation Of Revenues Of Non-Governmental Organizations From Personal Contributions Of The Ukrainian Population," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 64-77, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic and social indicators; effectiveness; European integration; indexes; multicriteria methods; public management; socio-economic viability.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C43 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Index Numbers and Aggregation
    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2020:y:2020:i:35:p:139-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Androniceanu Armenia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.