IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rampas/v2018y2018i30p67-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tax Incentives As A Main Factor To Attract Foreign Direct Investments In Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Beata SLUSARCZYK

    (The Management Faculty, Czestochowa University of Technology, Czestochowa, Poland and North-West University, Faculty of Economic Sciences and IT, Vaal Triangle, South Africa)

Abstract

The inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI) is one of the most important stimuli boosting the economy of host countries. No wonder, therefore, that the governments of the countries show a great interest in the inflow of foreign capital and create favorable conditions for investors. Investment incentives take different forms and are offered within the framework of target programs, and also regulated by laws. In the paper, there are presented two most significant examples of supporting FDI with tax incentives in Poland: State aid addressed to investors in Special Economic Zones (SEZ), and subsequently exemption from property tax, offered to investors by individual municipalities. The research was based on the analysis of legal documents and reports relating to public aid granted in Poland, assessing the functioning of Special Economic Zones, and many other authenticated studies. The result of the conducted considerations indicates that foreign investors frequently and substantially benefit from the incentives offered by the Polish government, which is confirmed by the value of the capital invested by them in the form of FDI

Suggested Citation

  • Beata SLUSARCZYK, 2018. "Tax Incentives As A Main Factor To Attract Foreign Direct Investments In Poland," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2018(30), pages 67-81, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2018:y:2018:i:30:p:67-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ramp.ase.ro/_data/files/articole/2018/30-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thierry Madiès & Jean-Jacques Dethier, 2012. "Fiscal Competition In Developing Countries: A Survey Of The Theoretical And Empirical Literature," Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy (JICEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 1-31.
    2. David BECERRA ALONSO & Armenia ANDRONICEANU & Irina GEORGESCU, 2016. "Sensitivity and vulnerability of European countries in time of crisis based on a new approach to data clustering and curvilinear analysis," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2016(27), pages 46-61, Decembre.
    3. Ma. Laarni D. Revilla, 2016. "Cross-country Econometric Study on the Impact of Fiscal Incentives on FDI," Working Papers id:11472, eSocialSciences.
    4. Tian, Yuan, 2018. "Optimal policy for attracting FDI: Investment cost subsidy versus tax rate reduction," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 151-159.
    5. Jacques Morisset, 2003. "Tax Incentives : Using Tax Incentives to Attract Foreign Direct Investment," World Bank Publications - Reports 11325, The World Bank Group.
    6. Nuri BALTACI & Muhammet ÞAHÝN, 2016. "Relationship between Tax Regulations and Direct Foreign Capital: Case of Balkan Countries," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 642-651, December.
    7. Joanna Kurowska-Pysz & Katarzyna Szczepańska-Woszczyna, 2017. "The Analysis of the Determinants of Sustainable Cross-Border Cooperation and Recommendations on Its Harmonization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Quan Li, 2016. "Fiscal decentralization and tax incentives in the developing world," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 232-260, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Asif Khan & Hossam Haddad & Mahmoud Odeh & Ahsanuddin Haider & Mohammed Arshad Khan, 2022. "Institutions, Culture, or Interaction: What Determines the Financial Market Development in Emerging Markets?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Olena Chygryn & Yuriy Petrushenko & Alina Vysochyna & Anna Vorontsova, 2018. "Assessment of Fiscal Decentralization Influence on Social and Economic Development," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(4), pages 69-84.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah Bauerle Danzman & Alexander Slaski, 2022. "Incentivizing embedded investment: Evidence from patterns of foreign direct investment in Latin America," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 63-87, January.
    2. Aneta Bobenič Hintošová & František Sudzina & Terézia Barlašová, 2021. "Direct and Indirect Effects of Investment Incentives in Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Evgeny N. Timushev, 2019. "Federal Intergovernmental Transfers and the Level of Intraregional Fiscal Decentralization in Russia," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 6, pages 27-42, December.
    4. Grzegorz Kinelski & Jakub Stęchły & Piotr Bartkowiak, 2022. "Various Facets of Sustainable Smart City Management: Selected Examples from Polish Metropolitan Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Fred Eka, 2019. "IDE chinois et croissance économique des pays d'Afrique sub-saharienne : approche par la MMG en données de panel," Working papers of CATT hal-02141049, HAL.
    6. Serhiy SHKARLET & Igor OLIYCHENKO & Maksym DUBYNA & Maryna DITKOVSKA & Vladimir ZHOVTOK, 2020. "Comparative Analysis Of Best Practices In E-Government Implementation And Use Of This Experience By Developing Countries," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2020(34), pages 118-136, June.
    7. Oana Vasile & Armenia Androniceanu, 2018. "An Overview of the Romanian Asylum Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Cooray, Arusha & Tamazian, Artur & Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya, 2014. "What drives FDI policy liberalization? An empirical investigation," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 179-189.
    9. Rastislav Kazanský & Vladimír Andrassy, 2019. "Conflict resolution approaches towards smart sustainability of internal relations," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(3), pages 1468-1484, March.
    10. Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Timothy Goodspeed & Li Zhang, 2011. "Do Companies View Bribes as a Tax? Evidence on the Trade-off between Corporate Taxes and Corruption in the Location of FDI," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1101, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    11. Mitsuo Inada, 2022. "Promotion or liberalization: The effect of targeted investment policies on foreign direct investment inflows," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 489-505, December.
    12. Mian Sajid Nazir & Qaisar Hafeez & Salah U‐Din, 2022. "Did reduction in corporate tax rate attract FDI in Pakistan?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2256-2267, April.
    13. Gheorghe H. Popescu & Elvira Nica & Florin Cristian Ciurlău & Mihaela Comănescu & Teodora Bițoiu, 2017. "Stabilizing Valences of an Optimum Monetary Zone in a Resilient Economy—Approaches and Limitations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-26, June.
    14. Xiaosan Zhang & Xiaojie Hu & Fang Wu, 2022. "Fiscal Decentralization, Taxation Efforts and Corporate Green Technology Innovation in China Based on Moderating and Heterogeneity Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    15. Revilla, Ma. Laarni D., 2016. "Cross-Country Econometric Study on the Impact of Fiscal Incentives on Foreign Direct Investment," Research Paper Series DP 2016-17, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    16. Yingjie Niu & Jinqiang Yang & Siqi Zhao, 2022. "Robust stimulus of private investment: Tax rate cut or investment subsidy?," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 18(3), pages 339-357, September.
    17. Ma. Laarni D. Revilla, 2016. "Cross-country Econometric Study on the Impact of Fiscal Incentives on FDI," Working Papers id:11472, eSocialSciences.
    18. Shivam Goyal & Dixit Garg & Sunil Luthra, 2022. "Analyzing critical success factors to adopt sustainable consumption and production linked with circular economy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5195-5224, April.
    19. He, Qichun & Sun, Meng, 2014. "Does fiscal decentralization promote the inflow of FDI in China?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 361-371.
    20. Aleksynska, Mariya & Gaisford, James & Kerr, William, 2003. "Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in Transition Economies," MPRA Paper 7668, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2003.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    tax incentives; investments; FDI; Poland;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E63 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy; Stabilization; Treasury Policy
    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2018:y:2018:i:30:p:67-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Androniceanu Armenia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.