IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rampas/v2011y2011i16p60-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Slovenian Criteria on Top Public Officials Selection: Theory, Regulation, Implementation and Case Law 2003-2011

Author

Listed:
  • Polona KOVAC

    (University of Ljubljana; President of the Officials Council, Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

The paper presents the procedures for the selection of top-ranking officials pursuant to the Civil Servants Act, applied in the work of the Officials Council of the Republic of Slovenia and its special competition commissions between 2003 and 2011. Seven years from the adoption of the Civil Servants Act and the first Standards of Professional Qualifications, Selection Criteria and Testing Methods, the Officials Council revised the Standards with due consideration of the development of human resource management, the experience in administration, and case law. The new Standards apply to all open competitions published since January 2011 and relate to both selection criteria and methods for the evaluation of candidates’ eligibility, since a legitimate and most suitable recruitment is only possible based on a combination of both substantive and procedural law. The revised Standards redefine the elements of candidates’ qualification for top positions, bringing professional knowledge of the field concerned and managerial experience or skills on an equal footing. The procedure is now more flexible and particular attention is paid to non-discrimination of candidates. The revision of the Standards contributes to meeting the constitutional objective of the selection of the best candidate for the performance of public tasks, while an amendment of the above Act will be necessary for any further development.

Suggested Citation

  • Polona KOVAC, 2011. "Slovenian Criteria on Top Public Officials Selection: Theory, Regulation, Implementation and Case Law 2003-2011," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2011(16), pages 60-81, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2011:y:2011:i:16:p:60-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ramp.ase.ro/_data/files/rezumat/2011/16-04-en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2011:y:2011:i:16:p:60-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Androniceanu Armenia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.