IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v14y2020i1p410-420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics Of Technology Transfer In Romanian Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Simona Catalina STEFAN
  • Cezar-Petre SIMION
  • Stefan Catalin POPA

Abstract

In this research, in order to know the opinion of the subjects involved in the technology transfer processes, a survey was conducted based on a technology transfer questionnaire. The majority of the respondents to the questionnaire are represented by researchers from research institutes or by teachers from university education involved in research-development, technological development and innovation activities. In the case of universities and national research and development institutes, the research centers / sections / laboratories constitute, in the vast majority of cases, the organizational entities involved in the technology transfer processes. The situation is radically different in the case of private research institutes where the technology transfer centers and technology brokers are the most important entities involved in technology transfer processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona Catalina STEFAN & Cezar-Petre SIMION & Stefan Catalin POPA, 2020. "Characteristics Of Technology Transfer In Romanian Organizations," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 410-420, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:410-420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conferinta.management.ase.ro/archives/2020/PDF/2_16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. García-Vega, María & Vicente-Chirivella, Óscar, 2020. "Do university technology transfers increase firms’ innovation?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Ovidiu NICOLESCU & Ciprian NICOLESCU, 2017. "Recent World Tendencies In The Organisation Environment," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 438-445, November.
    3. De Moortel, Kevin & Crispeels, Thomas, 2018. "International university-university technology transfer: Strategic management framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 145-155.
    4. Claudiu CICEA & Corina MARINESCU & Nicolae MOROIANU, 2015. "Innovation Process And Business Functions’ Implication In The New Product Development Process," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 227-233, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carboni, Oliviero A. & Medda, Giuseppe, 2021. "External R&D and product innovation: Is over-outsourcing an issue?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. de Almeida, Liliane & Augusto de Jesus Pacheco, Diego & Caten, Carla Schwengber ten & Jung, Carlos Fernando, 2021. "A methodology for identifying results and impacts in technological innovation projects," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Yindan Ye & Kevin De Moortel & Thomas Crispeels, 2020. "Network dynamics of Chinese university knowledge transfer," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1228-1254, August.
    4. Albats, Ekaterina & Bogers, Marcel & Podmetina, Daria, 2020. "Companies’ human capital for university partnerships: A micro-foundational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Olena Havrylchk & Aref Mahdavi Ardekani, 2020. "Real effects of lending-based crowdfunding platforms on the SMEs," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 20024, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    6. Korapin Jirapong & Karina Cagarman & Laura von Arnim, 2021. "Road to Sustainability: University–Start-Up Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Yexin Liu & Weiwei Wu & Yanggi Kim, 2023. "How do latecomer firms achieve catch-up through technology management: a comparative analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Cristian VLAD & Luiza GATAN & Fumiaki TAJIRI & Toru TAKAHASHI, 2019. "Rewiring Old Business €“ Corporate Value Creation At The Headquarters Of Toyota Motor Corporation," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 310-316, November.
    9. Jiaming Jiang & Yu Zhao & Junshi Feng, 2022. "University–Industry Technology Transfer: Empirical Findings from Chinese Industrial Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Petra Maresova & Ruzena Stemberkova & Oluwaseun Fadeyi, 2019. "Models, Processes, and Roles of Universities in Technology Transfer Management: A Systematic Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-36, September.
    11. Fernando Alexandre & Hélder Costa & Ana Paula Faria & Miguel Portela, 2022. "Enhancing University–Industry collaboration: the role of intermediary organizations," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 1584-1611, October.
    12. Cao, Qinwei & Li, Yi & Peng, Huatao, 2023. "From university basic research to firm innovation: diffusion mechanism and boundary conditions under a U-shaped relationship," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    13. Oluwaseun Fadeyi & Petra Maresova & Ruzena Stemberkova & Micheal Afolayan & Funminiyi Adeoye, 2019. "Perspectives of University-Industry Technology Transfer in African Emerging Economies: Evaluating the Nigerian Scenario via a Data Envelopment Approach," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Song, Haoyang & Hou, Jianhua & Zhang, Yang, 2022. "Catalytic capacity of technological innovation: Multidimensional definition and measurement from the perspective of knowledge spillover," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:410-420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.