IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rjr/romjef/v6y2009i3p184-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the Intangible Content of Goods Traded on International Markets. An Exercise on "Made in Italy" versus "Made in China" case

Author

Listed:
  • Di Tommaso, Marco R.

    (University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy)

  • Dragomirescu, Horatiu

    (Bucharest University of Economics – ASE, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This article aims at proposing a simple, easily applicable, but still reliable methodology, based upon the analysis of price differentials, designed for quantifying the intangible versus tangible attributes embedded in commodities traded on the contemporary international ma University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy rkets. The proposed methodology is based upon the analysis of price differentials, considered as important indicators of consumer-perceived quality differentiation between similar goods having diverse suppliers. In the analysis exercise presented, we compared different products of Italy and China through disaggregating the available statistical data and highlighting the qualitative differences between "Made in Italy" and "Made in China" goods. The relationship between intangible assets, at firm and territory level, and the intangible contents of goods is also discussed, and implications for firms' strategies and industrial policy are drawn.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Tommaso, Marco R. & Dragomirescu, Horatiu, 2009. "Measuring the Intangible Content of Goods Traded on International Markets. An Exercise on "Made in Italy" versus "Made in China" case," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 6(3), pages 184-197, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:rjr:romjef:v:6:y:2009:i:3:p:184-197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ipe.ro/rjef/rjef3_09/rjef3_09_14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    goods; tangible content; intangible content; price differential; industrial policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L5 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy
    • L6 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing
    • O2 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy
    • O5 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rjr:romjef:v:6:y:2009:i:3:p:184-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Corina Saman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipacaro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.