IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rje/randje/v20y1989ispringp102-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple Signals, Statistical Sufficiency, and Pareto Orderings of Best Agency Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Amin H. Amershi
  • John S. Hughes

Abstract

In this study we identify necessary and sufficient conditions for sufficient statistics to strictly (Pareto) dominate all nonsufficient statistics as information for contracting in agencies with moral hazard. We first observe that strict dominance requires that an optimal compensation scheme itself be a sufficient statistic. Since this can occur only in settings where the family of distributions parameterized by the agent's hidden effort admits one-dimensional sufficient statistics, strict dominance is the exceptional case. Nevertheless, we are able to show that there exists a substantial class of distributions, containing many well-known families, for which strict dominance does obtain.

Suggested Citation

  • Amin H. Amershi & John S. Hughes, 1989. "Multiple Signals, Statistical Sufficiency, and Pareto Orderings of Best Agency Contracts," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 20(1), pages 102-112, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:rje:randje:v:20:y:1989:i:spring:p:102-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0741-6261%28198921%2920%3A1%3C102%3AMSSSAP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-P&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pierre Chaigneau & Alex Edmans & Daniel Gottlieb, 2014. "The Generalized Informativeness Principle," NBER Working Papers 20729, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Schnedler Wendelin, 2011. "You Don’t Always Get What You Pay For: Bonuses, Perceived Income and Effort," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, February.
    3. John Christensen & Joel Demski, 1995. "Project selection and audited accrual measurement in a multi-task setting," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 405-432.
    4. Amin H. Amershi & Peter Cheng, 1989. "On the demand for historical events recording and maintenance of audit trails," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 72-90, September.
    5. Chaigneau, Pierre & Edmans, Alex & Gottlieb, Daniel, 2019. "The informativeness principle without the first-order approach," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 743-755.
    6. Junwook Yoo & Igor Semenenko, 2021. "Performance measure aggregation – two action levels," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(2), pages 564-572.
    7. Budde, Jörg, 2005. "Information in tournaments under limited liability," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 21/2005, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    8. Budde, Jörg, 2009. "Information in tournaments under limited liability," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-2), pages 59-72, January.
    9. Alex Gershkov & Jianpei Li & Paul Schweinzer, 2009. "Efficient tournaments within teams," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 40(1), pages 103-119, March.
    10. Göx, Robert F. & Hemmer, Thomas, 2020. "On the relation between managerial power and CEO pay," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rje:randje:v:20:y:1989:i:spring:p:102-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rje.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.